Research Article

Developing a Modified Low-Density Lipoprotein (M-LDL-C) Friedewald’s Equation as a Substitute for Direct LDL-C Measure in a Ghanaian Population: A Comparative Study

Table 3

Means ± SDs and percentages of correctly classified subjects in risk categories regarding TC, TG and D-LDL-C concentrations given by NCEP ATP III.

of subjects correctly classified by the following formulas
TC (mmol/L)nD-LDL-CF-LDL-CN-LDL-CA-LDL-CM-LDL-CFNAM

≤4.135862.01±0.531.91±0.401.89±0.402.11±0.382.09±0.4177.6%77.9%92.6%86.4%
4.14-5.165362.49±0.512.79±0.412.77±0.393.04±0.312.99±0.4078.1%77.9%84.1%78.9%
5.17-6.202722.92±0.503.52±0.453.52±0.413.80±0.363.78±0.4272.4%76.4%65.6%64.6%
6.21-7.24893.44±0.654.45±0.494.43±0.444.66±0.384.72±0.4565.8%70.3%56.9%48.1%
≥ 7.25353.90±0.666.16±2.186.17±2.186.37±1.846.53±2.2163.8%68.9%59.6%50.8%
TG (mmol/L)
≤1.1310552.40±0.692.63±0.902.57±0.892.92±0.912.78±0.9175.2%79.1%73.0%80.6%
1.14-1.693242.61±0.702.96±0.903.10±0.933.10±0.993.24±0.9630.2%32.4%29.3%29.6%
1.70-2.25762.75±0.693.18±1.203.30±0.893.29±1.203.58±1.1919.7%23.7%25.0%22.4%
2.26-2.82402.68±0.753.49±2.823.74±2.743.51±2.494.01±2.8211.4%5.0%2.5%10.0%
2.83-4.52232.74±1.013.00±1.053.43±0.963.03±1.023.75±1.074.3%8.7%8.7%17.4%
LDL-C (mmol/L
≤2.599032.01±0.382.33±0.652.31±0.652.61±0.682.53±0.6780.0%80.4%80.0%81.4%
2.60-3.354472.92±0.223.05±0.903.04±0.893.23±0.883.27±0.9241.4%42.9%31.7%34.1%
3.36-4.121423.62±0.183.98±0.913.95±0.924.18±0.934.22±0.9731.9%31.4%19.2%22.6%
4.13-4.89214.36±0.215.68±2.545.64±2.575.72±2.265.94±2.268.2%9.5%9.8%42.5%
≥4.9055.54±0.446.08±2.126.06±2.696.07±2.696.40±2.0610.6%8.8%3.5%7.7%

p<0.05,p<0.0001: significant compared to D-LDL-C.
TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; D-LDL-C: directly measured LDL-C; FLDL-C, LDL-C calculated by Friedewald’s formula; N-LDL-C, LDL-C calculated by Martin’s formula; A-LDL-C, LDL-C calculated by Anandaraja’s formula; M-LDL-C, LDL-C calculated by modified formula.