Research Article

Comparative Serological Study for the Prevalence of Anti-MERS Coronavirus Antibodies in High- and Low-Risk Groups in Qatar

Table 3

Comparative serological analysis of reactive and borderline samples from blood donors (BD).

rS1-ELISAFull virus IIFTrS1-IIFTppNT
Sample identifierIgG (OD, ratio, endpoint titer)IgG titerIgM titerIgG titerIC50 titer (EMC/JordanN3)

Reactive ()BD 2014/597(0.905, 2.114, 201)000<50
BD 2015/1303(0.397, 1.3, 101)1000000<50
BD 2015/3004(0.439, 1.26, 201)000<50
BD 2015/3119(0.402, 1.06, 401)000<50
BD 2015/3380(0.477, 1.1, 101)1000000<50
BD 2015/3513(0.497, 1.39, 401)000<50
BD 2015/4435(0.661, 1.74, 201)000<50
Borderline ()BD 2012/2644(0.333, 0.83, 101)000<50
BD 2015/1816(0.456, 0.823,201)000<50
BD 2015/4708(0.408, 1.07, 101)000<50
Selected negative (showing 3/13) BD 2015/2859(0.034, 0.076, <101)000<50
BD 2015/2988(0.039, 0.112, <101)000<50
BD 2015/3379(0.065, 0. 16, <101)03200531/502

Initial screening was done with rS1-ELISA, and reactive samples were further tested with various serological assays as indicated above. 13 negative samples from the initial screening with rS1-ELISA were selected for comparison, and one was found positive with full virus IgM and ppNT. Positive samples are shown in italic.