Exposure to Volatile Essential Oils of Myrtle (<i>Myrtus communis</i> L.) Leaves for Improving the Postharvest Storability of Fresh Loquat Fruits

Bahadırlı, Nadire Pelin; Kahramanoğlu, İbrahim; Wan, Chunpeng

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8857669

Journal of Food Quality

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Preharvest and Postharvest Factors Improving Horticultural Product Quality and Shelf-Life

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8857669 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8857669

Exposure to Volatile Essential Oils of Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) Leaves for Improving the Postharvest Storability of Fresh Loquat Fruits

Nadire Pelin Bahadırlı,¹İbrahim Kahramanoğlu,²and Chunpeng Wan³

Academic Editor: giorgia liguori

Received27 Sept 2020

Revised26 Nov 2020

Accepted26 Nov 2020

Published04 Dec 2020

Abstract

Fresh loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) fruits easily lose their marketability because of fungal spoilage, browning, and weight loss after harvest. The use of essential oils as postharvest treatment is a talented alternative to fungicides mainly because of their ability to reduce respiration and transpiration of the fresh fruits during storage. However, the postharvest studies with the volatiles of essential oils are limited. The present study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of volatile essential oils of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) leaves for preserving the postharvest storability of loquat fruits. Test fruits of the present study were exposed to 5 different treatments, which are (i) water vapor (2 min), (ii) myrtle leaves (3% w/w), (iii) myrtle leaf vapor (2 min), (iv) myrtle leaf vapor (10 min), and (v) untreated control. A total of 30 compounds were isolated from the essential oil, and the three highest amounts of compounds were determined as eucalyptol (39.38%), α-pinene (24.98%), and linalool (8.18%). Exposure to myrtle leaves (3% w/w) and myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) was also noted to provide higher efficacy for reducing the weight loss, decay incidence, and browning index.

1. Introduction

Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) is a subtropical plant which was originated from south-central China. It belongs to the Rosaceae family [1] and widely adapted to many regions of the world, including South Africa, the United States of America, Asia, and Mediterranean countries [2]. Loquat fruits are nutritious and have high amount of diverse phytochemicals [3]. Loquat fruits have also been reported as delicious fruits, which are highly appreciated by consumers and have been used for many purposes, including fresh consumption, syrups, jams, juices, and wines [2]. Loquat fruits also have a long history in traditional Chinese medicine [4]. One of the main disadvantages of loquat fruits for marketing is the short storability of the fruits due to enzymatic browning, weight loss, and pathogenic decay [5]. Weight loss and pathogenic decay were reported to be controlled by storing the fruits at low temperatures (5 to 7°C). However, low temperatures are known to adversely affect fruit quality due to chilling injury [6]. The main symptoms of chilling injury at the loquat fruits are the internal and external browning together with increased fruit firmness and reduced juice content. Heat treatment [7] and application of edible coatings [8–10] have been reported to reduce fruit browning.

Postharvest pathogens are the other important factors reducing the marketability of loquat fruits. Over the last 70 years, fungicides and other agrochemicals have been the main methods for controlling postharvest pathogens. However, the acceptability of agrochemicals has been decreasing since the beginning of the 20^th century, due to the confirmation of their possible adverse effects on human health and the environment [11]. Therefore, alternatives to the agrochemicals have been the subject of current studies, which mainly focus on the use of biomaterials [12]. The use of plant-derived biomaterials in postharvest handling of fruits had great interest since the 20^th century, mainly because of their high acceptability by the consumers due to their extended threshold for toxicity [13]. The plant extracts [14–18], essential oils [19–21], and edible coatings and/or films [22–24] have been reported to have high potential for improving the postharvest storability of fresh fruits and vegetables and controlling postharvest pathogens.

The mode of action of the plant-derived biomaterials is mainly a result of the semipermeable barrier for water vapor, oxygen, and carbon dioxide which help to reduce transpiration and respiration. Biomaterials also include diverse phytochemicals which are known to activate some enzymes (ascorbate peroxidise-APX, catalase-CAT, and superoxide dismutase-SOD) and/or deactivate some others (polyphenoloxidase-PPO and peroxidise-POD), which help for preserving postharvest fruit quality and/or controlling fruit pathogens [17, 25]. Essential oils (EOs), with their diverse phytochemical compounds and biologically active characteristics, have high potential for preserving postharvest fruit quality [26–28]. Another advantage of the EOs is their ability to be applied as vapors [29]. Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) plants grow wildly in the Mediterranean basin and are an important element in the maquis [30]. The essential oils of myrtle leaves are reported to be used in the perfume and flavor industry and have high antimicrobial activity [31]. Several studies have been performed about the chemical composition of the essential oils of myrtle leaves [31–34]; however, the postharvest studies with the EOs of myrtle leaves are limited. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of volatile essential oils of myrtle (M. communis L.) leaves for preserving the postharvest storability of loquat fruits. Parallel to the postharvest studies, the essential oils of the myrtle leaves of the present study were also determined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Loquat fruits Eriobotrya japonica cv. “Morphitiki” of the present study were hand-collected at horticultural maturity (27 April 2020) based on skin color (fully yellow-orange) from a commercial plantation located in Yayla village in Northern Cyprus. The SSC: TA was also used to determine horticultural maturity. The SSC was between 11.00% and 12.00%, whereas the TA was between 0.95 g 100 g⁻¹ and 1.05 g 100 g⁻¹ [10]. Fruits were then immediately transferred to the laboratory and were selected to ensure homogeneous size and color and to eliminate any damaged fruits. At the same time, leaves of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) were collected from the same village, about 400 m away from the loquat plantation. In the experiments, the young leaves of myrtle are used because their balsamic time (June) is very near and the old ones are eliminated. The use of the old leaves can be quite dangerous because normally they contain some specific pathogens which may aggravate the decay of the treated fruits.

2.2. Experimental Methodologies

The experimental studies were planned to continue for 42 days and quality parameters to be measured within a 7-day interval (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42). For each measurement point, 3 replications with 10 fruits in each were assigned. Therefore, totally 180 fruits (6 3 10) were designed for each treatment. After selection, fruits were randomly divided into 5 groups (# of treatments) of 180 fruits in each group. These groups were then treated with one of the following treatments: (i) water vapor (2 min), (ii) myrtle leaves (3% w/w of total weight of fruits), (iii) myrtle leaf vapor (2 min), (iv) myrtle leaf vapor (10 min), and (v) untreated control. Fruits were all dipped in distilled water for 1 min duration and air dried for 30 min before exposing to the treatments explained below. Detailed explanation for the treatments is given in Table 1.

After exposing to the abovementioned treatments and packaging, all fruit trays were transferred to the storage conditions of 4 ± 1°C and 95% relative humidity. Studies were continued for 42 days, and a total of 3 trays from each group were taken out from cold rooms with 7-d intervals (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 d) to measure the quality characteristics. Study duration and measurement points were determined according to the several previous studies which used 5/7-day intervals for 35–40 d storage durations [7, 35].

2.3. Data Collection

Weight loss, decay incidence (DI), browning index (BI), fruit firmness, soluble solids concentration (SSC), and titratable acidity (TA) were all measured according to the following methods. Weight loss (%) was determined by subtracting the final weight from the initial weight and dividing the solution to the initial weight and multiplying with 100. Initial and final weights of the fruits were all measured with a digital scale (±0.01 g). DI of the fruits was assessed by using the four-point scale formula [36]. To do so, all fruits were individually graded from 0 to 3 where 0 means no decay, 1 represents slight decay (≤25%), 2 equals moderate decay (25% < 50%), and 3 means severe decay (>50%). The following formula was then used to calculate the DI. DI = {[(1 × N₁) + (2 × N₂) + (3 × N₃)] × 100/(3 × N)}. Here, N equals to the total number of fruits where N_x represents the number of fruits with “x” score of decay severity.

The BI was used to measure the chilling severity of the fruits. The 0–4 scale of Rui et al. [37] was used to determine BI. In this scale, 0 equals no browning, 1 represents slight browning (less than <5%), 2 means moderate browning (5–25%), 3 represents moderately severe browning (25–50%), and 4 equals to severe browning (>50%). Scoring of the fruits was performed after 1 additional day at 20°C. Next, the following formula was used to calculate BI. BI index = {∑[(BI scale) × (number of fruit at that BI)]}/(4 × total number of fruit in each treatment). The limit of acceptability (marketability) of the fruits was defined as a BI index of 0.4 according to Ghasemnezhad et al. [8].

A hand penetrometer with a 5 mm-diameter probe was used at a speed of 1 mm s⁻¹ to measure the fruit firmness (kg cm⁻²). Then, SSC of each loquat fruits was assessed by using a hand refractometer. Weight loss, fruit firmness, decay incidence, browning index, and SSC were measured for 30 individual fruits for each treatment. Finally, TA of loquat fruits was assessed according to the method of AOAC [38] as g/100 g of malic acid. For TA determination, a mixture of the juice of 10 fruits belonging to the same replication of same treatment was used. Thus, a total of 3 replications were used for each treatment.

2.4. Isolation and Analyses of Essential Oil

The steam distillation method (by using Clevenger-type apparatus (European Pharmacopeia)) was used to separate volatile essential oils from the plant leaves, and the oil was kept at amber vials at +4°C until analysis. Essential oil components were analysed with a GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) device, Thermo Scientific ISQ Single Quadrupole. 5 µl of essential oil was diluted in 2 ml cyclohexane. The column model was TG-Wax MS (5% Phenyl Polysilphenylene-siloxane, 0.25 mm inner diameter 60 m length, and 0.25 µm film thickness). The ionization energy was calibrated as 70 eV, and the mass interval was m/z 1.2–1200 amu. The scan mode was used as the screening more in data collection. The MS transfer line temperature was 250°C, MS ionization temperature was 220°C, and column temperature was 50°C at the beginning; then, it was increased up to 220°C with 3°C min⁻¹ rate of temperature increase. The structure of each component was defined by using mass spectrums (Wiley 9) with Xcalibur software. Retention indices were determined using retention times of n-alkanes (C8–C40) that were injected after the M. communis essential oil under the same chromatic conditions.

2.5. Data Analysis

Raw data of the experiments were subjected to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) by using SPSS 22.0 software. Comparison of the means of different treatments was assessed by Tukey’s HSD test at . Microsoft excel was then used to prepare figures from the means and standard deviations.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition of the Volatile Essential Oils

Volatile essential oil of myrtle leaves was determined to consist of 30 different compounds. The three most abundant compounds were determined as eucalyptol (39.38%), α-pinene (24.98%), and linalool (8.18%). The full list of the chemical compounds is given in Table 2. Eucalyptol is a colorless organic liquid compound, a cyclic ether, and a monoterpene. α-Pinene is a colorless terpenoid and liquid plant metabolite, which is substituted by methyl groups at 3 positions. Linalool is also a monoterpenoid, which is substituted by methyl groups at 2 positions and a hydroxy group at 1 position. Moreover, α-terpineol and limonene was found to have 6.94% and 6.16% in the essential oil of myrtle leaves.

3.2. Weight Loss and Fruit Firmness

Results of the present study showed that, as expected, the weight loss of the loquat fruits increased during the storage (Table 3.). Two (myrtle leaf (3% w/w) and myrtle leaf vapor (2 min)) of the four test applications were found to be highly effective in preventing the weight loss during storage (Figure 1(a).). Water vapor, which was tested as the second control of the present study was found to have slight influence on the weight loss prevention, but it was not statistically significant. Besides that, myrtle leaf vapor (10 min) application was also ineffective in preventing the weight loss, as compared with the myrtle leaf vapor (2 min). These results suggest that the increase in the exposing duration to the myrtle leaf vapor causes a reduction in the effectiveness of the application. At the end of the 42 days of storage, the minimum weight loss was noted from the myrtle leaf (3% w/w) treatment as 17.60% and was followed by the myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) treatment with 18.05%. No significant difference was noted between these two treatments. Moreover, the highest weight loss was observed from the control treatment with 23.20%.

(a)

(b)

Firmness of the loquat fruits showed a slightly different tendency during storage as compared with the other quality parameters (Table 3.). In the first weeks of storage, a slight decrease was noted in the fruit firmness, and then, it increased continuously corresponding to the decline of fruit weight and increase in BI. Fruit firmness was significantly lower at the fruits treated with myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) and myrtle leaf vapor (10 min) as compared with the untreated control fruits (Figure 1(b).). However, this was higher than the initial fruit firmness. The initial firmness of loquat fruits in present study was 0.42 kg cm⁻² and was found to increase until 0.72 kg cm⁻² at the untreated control fruits after 42 days of storage. During this period of cold storage, the application of myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) and myrtle leaf vapor (10 min) was observed to keep fruit firmness at lower degrees, 0.52 kg cm⁻² and 0.55 kgcm⁻², respectively.

3.3. Decay Incidence and Browning Index

As expected, DI (%) and BI were observed to have an increasing trend during cold storage. However, the decay incidence was not significant from the harvest date until the 28^th day of storage (Table 3.). Similar with the results of weight loss, the myrtle leaf (3% w/w) and myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) treatments were found to be effective in preventing the DI (Figure 2(a)). At the end of the storage (42 days of storage), the minimum DI was observed from the myrtle leaf (3% w/w) treatment with 50%. Although it was effective in reducing the DI, this was not acceptable for marketing. Therefore, it can be concluded from the results that the loquat fruits can be stored for 35 days in cold rooms, with the application of either myrtle leaf (3% w/w) or myrtle leaf vapor (2 min).

(a)

(b)

The results about BI were slightly similar with the effects on the weight loss and DI. However, it was noted that the myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) application has higher influence than the myrtle leaf (3% w/w) (Figure 2(b).). In addition to that, myrtle leaf vapor (10 min) application was also successful in preventing the BI. At the end of the storage period (42 days), the lowest browning index was noted from the myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) application with a score of 0.225 and was followed by the myrtle leaf (3% w/w) and myrtle leaf vapor (10 min), with BI scores of 0.392 and 0.408, respectively. At that time, the BI was observed as 0.708 at the untreated control fruits.

3.4. Soluble Solids Concentration and Titratable Acidity

In present study, the fruit SSC and TA were observed to have a decreasing trend during the first 21 days of cold storage, and then, the trend was changed to reverse (Table 3.). The initial SSC was 11.52% and was noted to increase up to 12.91% at the untreated control fruits in 42 days of storage. Results suggested that the all applications have a significant influence on the SSC, and the lowest SSC (12.52%) was measured from the fruits treated with myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) (Figure 3(a)). A similar trend was observed for the TA. The initial TA content was 0.98 g 100 ml⁻¹ malic acid. The TA of the untreated control fruits decreased to 0.55 g 100 ml⁻¹ malic acid in 21 days of storage, and then, it showed an increasing trend. The final TA content of the untreated control fruits was 1.51 g 100 ml⁻¹ malic acid. Results suggested that all treatments have significant effect on TA. Thus, the minimum TA content (1.32 g 100 ml⁻¹ malic acid) was measured from the myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

Novel results of the current work suggested that exposing loquat fruits to the volatile essential oils of myrtle leaves, either by packing together in a concentration of 3% w/w or exposing to the myrtle leaf vapor for 2 min, improves the postharvest storability of fruits. Overall results about the quality parameters of untreated control fruits are in accordance with the findings of Song et al. [9]. The dominant chemical compounds of the volatile essential oils were found to be te eucalyptol, α-pinene, and linalool for the myrtle leaves in the present study. Similarly, eucalyptol and α-pinene compounds were noted to be the two most dominant compounds of the essential oils extracted from M. communis L. leaves [33, 34]. Myszka et al. [34] reported 24 different chemical compounds from the essential oils of myrtle leaves, where 18 of them were similar to those of the current work. There is not much study about the effects of myrtle essential oils on the fruit weight, but similar results were noted for different essential oils including similar compounds in their chemical structures [15, 17, 19, 21, 24].

These terpenes were previously noted to have high bioactivity against several food spoilage microorganisms and pathogens [34, 39, 40]. The mechanism was reported be mainly disruption of the membrane functions by damaging the cell wall and membrane structures [39]. The two most important functions were noted to be electron transfer or enzyme activity. Therefore, the high influence of the myrtle leaf and myrtle leaf vapor on the prevention of the decay incidence in the present study can be attributed to the high eucalyptol and α-pinene contents in the volatile essential oils of myrtle leaves. Similar effects were previously noted for the essential oils of myrtle leaves on the Salmonella typhimurium [41], Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [42], and Cryptococcus neoformans (yeast) [43]. In the study of Fadil et al. [41], it is was noted that a mixture of Thymus vulgaris L. (55%) and M. communis L. (45%) essential oils provides high antibacterial activity against Salmonella typhimurium. In another study carried out in Algeria, is was found that the M. communis L. essential oil has strong antifungal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans (yeast) and Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum canis, and Trichophyton rubrum (dermatophytes) [43]. Current results of this study also reveal the traditional use of the Myrtle plants as a disinfectant in Greece [44]. In a most similar study, the essential oil vapors of M. communis L. were tested against Penicillium digitatum in in vitro conditions, and the results showed that it elapsed time between the fungal inoculum and vapor contact [45]. However, in the mentioned study, the essential oils of M. communis L. leaves were noted to have lower efficacy than those of Rosmarinus officinalis L. The volatile essential oil of myrtle leaves was also tested in vitro against two stored-product insects, Tribolium confusum and Callosobruchus maculates, and the results of this research showed that the volatile essential oils of myrtle leaves might be used as a potential biocontrol agent these insects [46].

Fruit browning, in conjunction with chilling injury, is among the most important postharvest problems of loquat fruits [47]. Current work demonstrated that exposing fruits to the volatile essential oils of myrtle leaves either by packing together or exposing to leaf vapor is an effective method for reducing the fruit browning. Several studies suggested that the application of different hormones or chemicals, i.e., methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, and 1-methylcyclopropene, was effective in reducing the browning index of loquat fruit [5, 48].

In agreement with the weight loss results, the results of the present study showed that the volatile essential oils of myrtle leaves are effective in preventing the changes in the fruit firmness. According to Song et al. [35], firmness of loquat fruits increases during storage, together with the lignin contents, and those are the typical symptoms of fruit browning. The main cause of the increase in fruit firmness was also attributed to the cell expansion and secondary lignification in cell wall [48]. Thus, the increase in lignin content causes a rigidity characteristic at the cell wall, which then causes an increase in fruit firmness [49]. Therefore, contrary to many of the fruits, increase in fruit firmness is not a desirable characteristic for the loquat fruits which has less extractable juice [50]. No measurement has been performed in the current work about the lignin content of the loquat fruits, but results showed that the essential oils of myrtle leaf provide favorable conditions for preventing the increase in fruit firmness. Furthermore, results of the present study showed that the volatiles of myrtle leaf have a slight influence on the SSC and TA contents of loquat fruits during storage. In a similar work, myrtle leaf oil application was noted to display similar effects on the SSC of strawberry fruits during storage [51].

5. Conclusions

To sum up, results of the current work suggested that the diverse composition of the volatile essential oils of myrtle leaf makes it a suitable agent for postharvest handling. Among the described 30 chemical compounds, eucalyptol, α-pinene, and linalool were found to be the most abundant compounds. Results also demonstrated that packaging of loquat fruits with myrtle leaves (3% w/w) or exposing them to the myrtle leaf vapor (2 min) provide higher efficacy for the reduction of weight loss, prevention of decay incidence, and reducing the fruit browning. Overall, results suggested that the fresh loquat fruits can be stored for 35 days at 4 ± 1°C and 95% relative humidity by exposing to myrtle leaves (3% w/w) and myrtle leaf vapor (2 min). Thus, the current study would be a preliminary study to investigate the effects of volatile essential oils of myrtle leaf on fruit quality and pathogenic mechanisms, and the results would guide further studies with different fruits.

Data Availability

All data used to support the findings of this study are included within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

“Conceptualization was carried out by N.P.B., İ.K., and C.W.; İ.K. and C.W. were responsible for the methodology; investigation was conducted by N.P.B. and İ.K.; data curation was performed by İ.K.; writing of the original draft was carried out by N.P.B. and İ.K.; C.W. was involved in writing the review and editing; visualization was performed by İ.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

References

J. Janick, “Predictions for loquat improvement in the next decade,” Acta Horticulture, vol. 887, pp. 25–29, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Lin, “Eriobotrya japonica (loquat),” in The Encyclopedia of Fruit and Nuts, CABI, Wallingford, UK, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Li, C. Xu, and K. Chen, “Nutritional and composition of fruit cultivars: loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.),” in Nutritional Composition of Fruit Cultivars, X. Li, Ed., pp. 371–394, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
D. D. He and Z. K. Luo, “Textual research on the herbal medicine of loquat,” Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, vol. 7, pp. 1687–1690, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. H. Zheng, S. Y. Li, Y. F. Xi, X. G. Xu, and Y. B. Yi, “Polyamine changes and chilling injury in cold-stored loquat fruits,” Acta Botanica Sinica, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 824–827, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
L. L. Shan, X. Li, P. Wang et al., “Characterization of cDNAs associated with lignification and their expression profiles in loquat fruit with different lignin accumulation,” Planta, vol. 227, no. 6, p. 1243, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, P. Jin, Y. Huang et al., “Effect of hot water combined with glycine betaine alleviates chilling injury in cold-stored loquat fruit,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 118, pp. 141–147, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghasemnezhad, M. A. Nezhad, and S. Gerailoo, “Changes in postharvest quality of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) fruits influenced by chitosan,” Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Song, W. Yuan, P. Jin et al., “Effects of chitosan/nano-silica on postharvest quality and antioxidant capacity of loquat fruit during cold storage,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 119, pp. 41–48, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
İ Kahramanoğlu, “Preserving postharvest storage quality of fresh loquat fruits by using different bio-materials,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 3004–3012, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Sharma, D. Singh, and R. Singh, “Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: a review,” Biological Control, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 205–221, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Silvestre, D. Duraccio, and S. Cimmino, “Food packaging based on polymer nanomaterials,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1766–1782, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Z. Tomazoni, M. R. Pansera, G. F. Pauletti, S. Moura, R. T. S. Ribeiro, and J. Schwambach, “In vitro antifungal activity of four chemotypes of Lippia alba (verbenaceae) essential oils against Alternaria solani (Pleosporeaceae) isolates,” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 999–1010, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, Y. Shen, C. Chen, and C. Wan, “Inhibition of key citrus postharvest fungal strains by plant extracts in vitro and in vivo: a review,” Plants, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 26, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
İ. Kahramanoğlu, “Effects of lemongrass oil application and modified atmosphere packaging on the postharvest life and quality of strawberry fruits,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 256, Article ID 108527, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Moosa, S. T. Sahi, S. A. Khan, and A. U. Malik, “Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid can suppress green and blue moulds of citrus fruit and induce the activity of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase,” Folia Horticulturae, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 195–204, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ncama, A. Mditshwa, S. Z. Tesfay, N. C. Mbili, and L. S. Magwaza, “Topical procedures adopted in testing and application of plant-based extracts as bio-fungicides in controlling postharvest decay of fresh produce,” Crop Protection, vol. 115, pp. 142–151, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
İ. Kahramanoğlu, S. Usanmaz, V. Okatan, and C. Wan, “Preserving postharvest storage quality of fresh-cut cactus pears by using different bio-materials,” CABI A&B, vol. 1, p. 7, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Pavela and G. Benelli, “Essential oils as ecofriendly biopesticides? Challenges and constraints,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1000–1007, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Hassanein, E. A. Salem, and A. A. Zahran, “Efficacy of coupling gamma irradiation with calcium chloride and lemongrass oil in maintaining guava fruit quality and inhibiting fungal growth during cold storage,” Folia Horticulture, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
İ. Kahramanoğlu, M. Aktaş, and Ş. Gündüz, “Effects of fludioxonil, propolis and black seed oil application on the postharvest quality of “wonderful” pomegranate,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 5, Article ID e0198411, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Saucedo-Pompa, R. Rojas-Molina, A. F. Aguilera-Carbó et al., “Edible film based on candelilla wax to improve the shelf life and quality of avocado,” Food Research International, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 511–515, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Mannozzi, J. P. Cecchini, U. Tylewicz et al., “Study on the efficacy of edible coatings on quality of blueberry fruits during shelf-life,” LWT-Food Science and Technology, vol. 85, pp. 440–444, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Riva, U. O. Opara, and O. A. Fawole, “Recent developments on postharvest application of edible coatings on stone fruit: a review,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 262, Article ID 109074, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ali, A. S. Khan, A. Nawaz et al., “Aloe vera gel coating delays postharvest browning and maintains quality of harvested litchi fruit,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 157, Article ID 110960, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Okut, M. Yagmur, N. Selcuk, and B. Yildirim, “Chemical composition of essential oil of mentha longifolia L. subsp. longifolia growing wild,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 525–529, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Servili, E. Feliziani, and G. Romanazzi, “Exposure to volatiles of essential oils alone or under hypobaric treatment to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 133, pp. 36–40, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Alemu, W. Garedew, and A. Gebre, “Essential oil yield and yield components of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) as affected by genotype and intrarow spacing at Jimma, SW Ethiopia,” Acta Agrobotanica, vol. 71, no. 3, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tripathi, N. K. Dubey, and A. K. Shukla, “Use of some essential oils as post-harvest botanical fungicides in the management of grey mould of grapes caused by Botrytis cinerea,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nassar, E.-S. Aboutabl, R. Ahmed, E.-D. El-Khrisy, K. Ibrahim, and A. Sleem, “Secondary metabolites and bioactivities of myrtus communis,” Pharmacognosy Research, vol. 2, no. 6, p. 325, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zomorodian, M. Moein, Z. G. Lori et al., “Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of the essential oil from myrtus communis leaves,” Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 76–84, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Salimi Beni, M. K. Kocheki Shahmokhtar, A. Masoumias, and H. Khajehsharifi, “Phytochemical and biological studies of some myrtus (Myrtus communis L.) populations of south west region of zagros (Iran),” Current Issue - Natural Products Chemistry and Research, vol. 5, no. 290, p. 2, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Usai, M. Marchetti, N. Culeddu, and M. Mulas, “Chemical composition of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) berries essential oils as observed in a collection of genotypes,” Molecules, vol. 23, no. 10, p. 2502, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Myszka, N. Sobieszczańska, A. Olejnik et al., “Studies on the anti-proliferative and anti-quorum sensing potentials of Myrtus communis L. essential oil for the improved microbial stability of salmon-based products,” Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft & Technologie, vol. 127, Article ID 109380, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Song, X. Wang, W. Hu et al., “A cold-induced phytosulfokine peptide is related to the improvement of loquat fruit chilling tolerance,” Food Chemistry, vol. 232, pp. 434–442, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cao, Y. Zheng, and Z. Yang, “Effect of 1-MCP treatment on nutritive and functional properties of loquat fruit during cold storage,” New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Rui, S. Cao, H. Shang, P. Jin, K. Wang, and Y. Zheng, “Effects of heat treatment on internal browning and membrane fatty acid in loquat fruit in response to chilling stress,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 1557–1561, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
AOAC, Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA, 15th edition, 1990.
V. Aleksic and P. Knezevic, “Antimicrobial and antioxidative activity of extracts and essential oils of myrtus communis L,” Microbiological Research, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 240–254, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Eguchi, A. Widiastuti, H. Odani et al., “Identification of terpenoids volatilized from Thymus vulgaris L. by heat treatment and their in vitro antimicrobial activity,” Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 94, pp. 83–89, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fadil, K. Fikri-Benbrahim, S. Rachiq et al., “Combined treatment of thymus vulgaris L., Rosmarinus officinalis L. and myrtus communis L. essential oils against Salmonella typhimurium: optimization of antibacterial activity by mixture design methodology,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 126, pp. 211–220, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fadil, A. Farah, B. Ihssane, T. Haloui, S. Lebrazi, and S. Rachiq, “Intrapopulation variability of Myrtus communis L. growing in morocco: chemometric investigation and antibacterial activity,” Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, vol. 7, pp. 35–40, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bouzabata, C. Cabral, M. J. Gonçalves et al., “Myrtus communis L. as source of a bioactive and safe essential oil,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 75, pp. 166–172, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sumbul, M. A. Ahmad, M. Asif, and M. Akhtar, “Myrtus communis linn.-a review,” Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 395–402, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Ladu, L. Cubaiu, G. d’Hallewin, G. Pintore, G. L. Petretto, and T. Venditti, “Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Myrtus communis L. essential oils treatments by vapor contact to control penicillium digitatum,” Journal of Food Processing & Technology, vol. 6, no. 9, p. 1, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Khani and F. Basavand, “Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of myrtle (myrtus communis L.) essential oil against two stored-product pests,” Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-Products, vol. 2, pp. 83–89, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Pareek, N. Benkeblia, J. Janick, S. Cao, and E. M. Yahia, “Postharvest physiology and technology of loquat (eriobotrya japonicaLindl.) fruit,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 1495–1504, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. F. Cao, Y. H. Zheng, K. T. Wang, H. J. Rui, H. T. Shang, and S. S. Tang, “The effects of 1-methylcyclopropene on chilling and cell wall metabolism in loquat fruit,” The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhao and R. A. Dixon, “Transcriptional networks for lignin biosynthesis: more complex than we thought?” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 227–233, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cai, C. Xu, X. Li, I. Ferguson, and K. Chen, “Accumulation of lignin in relation to change in activities of lignification enzymes in loquat fruit flesh after harvest,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 163–169, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Ulukanli and A. T. Oz, “The effect of oleum myrtle on the fruit quality of strawberries during MAP storage,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2860–2868, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Nadire Pelin Bahadırlı et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1244

Downloads

1125

Citations