|
Sr. # | Title | Findings | Methodology | Difference | References |
|
1 | Comparison of construction project risks before and during COVID-19 in Singapore: criticality and management strategies | As a direct result of the pandemic, identified adjustments in the prioritised risks, with the financial risk giving way to the labour shortage risk. In both time periods, the significance of the potential dangers to one’s health and safety was emphasised. | Used questions from surveys and interviews with a semi-structured format | Focuses on the risk shift that the pandemic has brought about in the building sector. Focuses on the context of Singapore and provides a viewpoint that is more specific to the region. | [19] |
2 | Post-COVID-19 recovery: an integrated framework of construction project performance evaluation in China | For the post-COVID-19 project recovery, critical success factors (CSFs) and key performance indicators (KPIs) were identified. Emphasised the necessity of effective management and technical innovation, the contentment of stakeholders, and enough resource availability for the purpose of recovery. | Used a variety of research approaches, including a study of the relevant literature; interviews with subject matter experts; a questionnaire survey; factor analysis; analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis; and structural equation modelling (SEM) | The emphasis here is on project recovery in China after COVID-19. Places an emphasis on CSFs, KPIs, and the links between the two. In the context of Chinese construction, this article provides a road map for project recovery. | [20] |
3 | Construction industry post-COVID-19 recovery: stakeholders perspective on achieving sustainable development goals | Role of stakeholders in enhancing sustainable development is clarified | Quantitative method only | Method is limited and does not provide implications for future sustainable development in post-COVID-19 environment | [16] |
4 | Opportunities and challenges for construction health and safety technologies under the COVID-19 pandemic in Chinese construction projects | Factors identified for the post-COVID-19 environment | Quantitative method with literature review | The results are only applicable on China with limited outcomes for sustainable development | [21] |
5 | A framework to analyze international competitiveness: the case of construction firms of China | A valid framework is provided for Chinese construction firms with critical focus on the competitive advantage | Quantitative method with expert review | The results are valid only for China and different sample size limits the findings to be applied in UK construction post-COVID-19 environment | [22] |
6 | Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on the United States construction industry: challenges and opportunities | Results are provided for US construction industry indicating impact factors of pandemic | Quantitative research method | No focus on sustainable development and competitive advantage. Sample size is also different. | [23] |
7 | Firm size influence on construction safety culture and construction safety climate | Impact of size of firm on construction safety is evaluated in post-COVID-19 environment | Quantitative and qualitative research method | Limited focus is provided on the construction sustainability and competitive advantage | [24] |
8 | Impact of COVID-19 on the US construction industry as revealed in the Purdue index for construction | Results consist of detailed impact factors of impact of pandemic for US construction | Quantitative research method | There is no focus on sustainability and also the competitive advantage is the major limitation of the study | [17] |
9 | New partnerships for co-delivery of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development | Results are based on impact of partnerships on the sustainable development | Quantitative method | There is no outcomes for the post-COVID-19 environment and competitive advantage | [25] |
10 | Sustainable construction investment, real estate development, and COVID-19: a review of literature in the field | The results are linked with sustainable development of the firms only | Quantitative research method | There is no evidence of competitive advantage and factors that affect in COVID-19 | [26] |
11 | New modes of operating for construction organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges, actions, and future best practices | The results are comprehensively focused on all potential factors that affect sustainable development | Quantitative research method | The evidence is not linked with any competitive advantage critical for the sustainable development of UK firms | [27] |
12 | Impact of COVID-19 on health and safety in the construction sector | Study explains the impact factors on construction health and safety in post-COVID-19 environment | Quantitative research method | The evidence is not linked with competitive advantage and sustainable development | [28] |
|