Research Article

A Precrash Scenario Analysis Comparing Safety Performance across Autonomous Vehicle Driving Modes

Table 2

Descriptive statistics of California AV crash dataset (sample size = 484).

VariableFrequencyPercentage (%)

Someone injured
 Yes7315.08
 No41184.92
Vehicle damage
 None387.85
 Minor36876.03
 Moderate7114.67
 Major71.45
Vehicle manufacturer
 Waymo LLC19339.88
 Cruise LLC17636.36
 Other11523.76
Production year of the AV
 20167114.67
 201711724.17
 201871.45
 20198116.74
 20207114.67
 202112425.62
 2022132.69
Number of vehicles involved
 17715.91
 240283.06
 351.03
Movement preceding crash
 Stopped18838.84
 Proceeding straight19941.12
 Making left turn418.47
 Making right turn357.23
 Backing214.34
Type of crash
 Head-on8717.98
 Rear-end23047.52
 Left crash8517.56
 Right crash8216.94
AV driving mode
 Autonomous driving23448.35
 Conventional driving16834.71
 Driving takeover8216.94
Facility type
 Intersection23849.17
 Road segment23147.73
 Parking lot153.10
Time of the crash
 Morning peak 7:00–9:00479.71
 Daytime 9:00–17:0027356.40
 Evening peak 17:00–19:00428.68
 Night 19:00–7:0012225.21
Weather
 Clear43289.26
 Rainy142.89
 Cloudy336.82
 Fog/visibility51.03
Light
 Daylight35773.76
 Dark with street lights12225.21
 Dark without streetlights51.03