Research Article
Factors Influencing Home Death in a Japanese Metropolitan Region
Table 2
The number of patients.
| | Total, | No. patients (%) | value | | | Single, | Multiple, |
| Total patients | 15027 (100.0) | 2105 (14.0) | 12922 (86.0) | .001 | Total patients per one clinica | 98.9 ± 277.6 (0–2561) | 25.1 ± 39.8 (0–229) | 192.9 ± 397.7 (0–2561) | | Total patients per one physiciana | 35.0 ± 75.4 (0–640) | 25.1 ± 39.8 (0–228) | 47.4 ± 103.2 (0–640) | .098 | Patients who died at home | 1083 (100.0) | 221 (20.4) | 863 (79.6) | <.001 | Patients who died at home per one clinica | 7.0 ± 16.0 (0–161) | 2.5 ± 4.5 (0–27) | 12.7 ± 22.5 (0–161) | | Patients who died at home per one physiciana | 2.6 ± 4.2 (0–27) | 2.5 ± 4.5 (0–27) | 2.8 ± 3.7 (0–20) | .730 | Patients living alone | 11.4 ± 36.2 (0–370) | 2.9 ± 6,9 (0–50) | 22.9 ± 53.1 (0–370) | .005 | Patients living alone who died at home (yes) | 38 (25.7) | 15 (17.6) | 23 (36.5) | .013 | Home death rate, %a,b | 12.3 ± 16.0 | 12.3 ± 24.0 | 12.2 ± 14.2 | .985 |
|
|
Student’s t-test, amean ± SD (range), b(patients who died at home/total patients) * 100.
|