Review Article
Emerging Photovoltaics: Organic, Copper Zinc Tin Sulphide, and Perovskite-Based Solar Cells
Table 3
A few representative devices, architecture, fill factors, and their efficiencies.
| Architecture | Type | HTM | (V) | FF | PCE (%) | Ref |
| mpTiO2/MAPbI3/HTM | MS | Spiro-OMeTAD | 0.99 | 0.73 | 15 | [24] | Y:TiO2/MAPb/HTM | P | Spiro-OMeTAD | 1.13 | 0.75 | 19.3 | [25] | mpTiO2/MAPbI3/HTM | MS | CuSCN | 1.01 | 0.62 | 12.4 | [26] | TiO2/MAPb/HTM | P | CuSCN | 0.73 | 0.62 | 6.4 | [27] | HTM/MAPb/PC61BM/ZnO | P | Graphene oxide | 0.99 | 0.72 | 11.1 | [28] | mpTiO2/MAPbI3/HTM | MS | P3HT | 0.73 | 0.73 | 6.7 | [29] |
|
|
P refers to devices with planar architecture and MS refers to devices with mesoporous architecture.
|