International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications

International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 5903106 | 6 pages |

Acceptability and Attitude towards a Mobile-Based Home Exercise Program among Stroke Survivors and Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Study

Academic Editor: Manolis Tsiknakis
Received25 Dec 2018
Revised11 Mar 2019
Accepted01 Apr 2019
Published02 May 2019


Background. Stroke is a leading cause of disability and requires continued care after hospital discharge. Mobile-based interventions are suitable to reduce the cost of stroke rehabilitation and facilitate self-management among stroke survivors. However, before attempting to use mobile-based home exercise program, it is crucial to recognize the readiness of stroke survivors and their caregivers to opt for such interventions. Objective. To assess the acceptability and attitude towards a mobile-based home exercise program among stroke survivors and their primary caregivers. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 102 participants to understand their attitude and acceptability towards mobile-based home exercise program. A validated 10-item questionnaire was adapted for the study. The questions which assessed the attitude were rated on a three-point Likert scale, with three denoting agree and one denoting disagree. The acceptability was assessed by their willingness to opt for a mobile-based home program services. A Chi-square analysis and cross-tabulation were performed to test differences between caregivers and patients. A logistic regression was performed to determine the effects of age, gender, and mobile phone on acceptability. Results. Ninety-two percent of caregivers and 90% of patients showed willingness to opt for mobile-based intervention. Majority of the participants showed a positive attitude towards this mode of treatment. There was no difference in the attitude noted among caregivers and patients (p>0.05) towards mobile-based intervention. Conclusion. The stroke survivors and caregivers welcomed the concept of mobile-based home exercise program even in a low-resource settings, but further studies to understand treatment and cost-effectiveness of this technology among the stroke survivors would lead to better implementation.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Stroke is one of the most disabling adult chronic diseases which requires the long-term continuance of exercises and physical activity [1, 2]. Home-based rehabilitation after stroke has growing evidence to optimize recovery [3]. Stroke patients receive instructions for home-based exercises at the time of discharge or during the follow-up visit. However, the amount of information, reinforcement, and support provided during hospital visits are limited [4].

Global Observatory for eHealth defines m-health or mobile health as “medical and public health practice supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones, patient monitoring devices, personal digital assistants, and other wireless devices” [5]. M-health is an upcoming and innovative concept for improving interaction between healthcare providers, patients [6, 7], and researchers [8, 9]. M-health is found feasible and even showed significant outcomes in other health conditions such as diabetes and cardiac rehabilitation [10, 11]. Studies have reported that m-health was effective in reducing the risk factors for stroke [12]. However, the implementation effectiveness of m-health for rehabilitation after stroke is not yet established.

Though the last decade saw a significant upswing in the field of m-health, its maximum potential still lies unexplored [13]. With a growing user base of this technology, its potential is enormous and needs to be adequately tapped for best results. According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), there are now over 5 billion wireless subscribers, and over 70% of them reside in low- and middle-income countries and have access to the Internet even in remote areas [5]. India’s telecommunication network is second largest in the world with 1.206 billion users as of September 2017 and has world’s second-largest Internet user base [14]. This echoes the fact that time is ripe for considering m-health as a suitable intervention for improving health behavior after stroke in India and worldwide [15].

Mobile-based home exercises could be delivered in the form of video games for exercises [16], music software for gait training [17], or videos of exercises using mobile app [18]. The implementation of any intervention requires not only the effectiveness of an intervention but also high acceptability and sustainability [19]. Therefore, before attempting to incorporate m-health in home-based exercises after stroke, it is important to recognize the opinions and readiness of the stakeholders towards such intervention [20].

1.2. Objective

Therefore, we aimed to assess the acceptability and attitude of stroke survivors and primary caregivers towards a mobile-based home exercise program.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among stroke survivors and primary caregivers of stroke patients.

2.2. Setting

The study was conducted in a tertiary care university teaching hospital of the semiurban region of coastal southern India, from August 2017 to March 2018. Necessary ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC: 484/2017).

2.3. Participants

Adult stroke survivors who were medically stable, had functional communication abilities, and were able to comprehend either regional language (Kannada) or English were included in the study. The caregivers who primarily took care of stroke survivors and were fluent in either regional language or English were included. Stroke survivors with cognitive impairments and other associated neuromuscular disorders were excluded. Both stroke survivors and the caregivers were excluded if they did not use a mobile phone. We used purposive sampling to select the patients with stroke. All stroke survivors who were admitted and referred for motor rehabilitation or those who came for a follow-up visits during the study period were screened for eligibility criteria. The caregivers of the stroke survivors were recruited individually and not paired with the patients to avoid the bias of opinion. The participants were recruited into the study after obtaining their written informed consent.

2.4. Data Measurement

A validated questionnaire was adapted from our previous study which was aimed at exploring the acceptability and attitude of students towards m-health. This questionnaire was modified for stroke survivors focusing on home exercise program, e.g., items like ‘use of mobile phone application will help to do home exercises more independently’ were added. Modifications in the questionnaire were agreed upon by all the authors and it was content validated by one expert from the field of Physiotherapy in Neurosciences and two experts from Health Information Management. Content validation was done for factors such as relevance, clarity, importance, and ethics of each item. The experts provided response between 1 and 5 on each question, where 1 indicated very low and 5 indicated very high for each factor. Questions which had 80% agreement between the experts were finally included in the questionnaire. Piloting of the questionnaire was done on one male and one female stroke survivors at two different time points to assess the administrative difficulties. The final questionnaire consisted of ten questions on attitude and acceptance towards m-health and its use for home-based exercises after stroke. The questions which assessed the attitude were rated on a three-point Likert scale, with three denoting agree and one denoting disagree. The acceptability was assessed by their willingness to opt for a mobile-based home exercise program and the charges that they were willing to pay for such services. The final questionnaire was translated to the regional language using parallel-back translation. The mobile-based home exercise program was developed for the stroke survivors and it consists of exercise prescription in the form of videos and audio instructions along with an educational video on stroke recovery and rehabilitation and feedback on everyday session. The exercise program model was shown to all the participants and they were asked to fill the questionnaire.

2.5. Study Size

The sample size was calculated with an expected proportion of 50% participants who are willing to accept a mobile-based home exercise program. Taking 10% as absolute precision and 7% nonresponse rate, the total sample size resulted in 102 participants.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data using Easy-R software. The scores obtained in the attitude questions were cross-tabulated to obtain percentages. The difference in the attitudes between the two groups was determined using Pearson’s Chi-square test, where P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effect of age, gender, and type of phone used on acceptability and attitude towards mobile-based home exercise program.

3. Results

We screened 157 potential participants for eligibility, 45 stroke patients were excluded as they were unstable or aphasic or had other major comorbidities. Ten caregivers were excluded as they declined to participate in the study or did not have a mobile phone. Figure 1 shows the flow of participant recruitment. A total of 102 participants were included in the study, 50 stroke survivors with mean age of 55 ± 13 years, and 52 caregivers with mean age of 39 ± 12 years. The demographic details of the study participants are provided in Table 1. All the participants had experience of using mobile phones for more than one year except for one participant who started using mobile phone six months back. Figure 2 represents the most common usage of mobiles among the participants. Four patients and 25 caregivers used Internet services on mobile phones. Most of the patients (96%) and caregivers (94.2%) had not used mobile phones for any healthcare services earlier.

Patients (n=50)Caregivers (n=52)

Age (years)
(Mean ±SD)55.2 ± 13.3939.78 ± 12.62
Male36 (72%)20 (38%)
Female14 (28%)32 (62%)
Type of phone used
Smart phone10 (20%)29 (56%)
Basic phone40 (80%)23 (44%)
Duration of stroke (months)
Median (IQR)0.45 (1.58)

3.1. Acceptability towards m-Health

The acceptability results revealed that majority of the patients (90%, n=45, 95% CI 0.81, 0.98) and caregivers (92.3%, n=48, 95% CI 0.85, 0.99) had the willingness to opt for mobile-based home exercise program after stroke (Table 3). Most of the stroke participants (72%, n=36) and caregivers (82.7%, n=43) showed readiness to pay nominal charges for such services. Only five patients (10%) and four caregivers (7.7%) were not willing to accept m-health. The reasons expressed by the participants for not opting this technology were using the phone less often and using it only for making calls and also the feeling that mobile phones are not beneficial for treatment purpose. Of the nine participants who did not opt for m-health technology, eight were basic mobile phone users, and one was a smartphone user, and all were of mean age 54 ±10 years.

3.2. Attitude towards m-Health

The attitude of stroke patients and caregivers towards mobile-based home exercises is shown in Table 2. The results indicated a high percentage of agreement towards these services; both among patients and caregivers. More than 80% of the participants accepted the benefits of mobile-based home exercise program, 72% agreed that it would lead to reduction of costs, and 70% believed that it will ensure confidentiality of information. Majority of the participants (82%-94.2%) perceived that mobile-based home exercise program would help in reduction of time in utilizing stroke care services; will be a useful reminder for home exercises; will improve awareness about stroke; will improve access to a therapist for follow-up; and make health information delivery faster.

Questions Agree % (n) Neutral % (n) Disagree % (n)p-value

Help in utilizing health care services for stroke by
(a) Reducing costs72.0 (36)86.5 (45)18.0 (9)7.7 (4)10.0 (5)5.8 (3)0.728
(b) Reducing time88.0 (44)90.4 (74)10.0 (5)9.6 (5)2.0 (1)0.0 (0)0.32
(c) Convenience in visiting healthcare center94.0 (47)86.5 (45)4.0 (2)7.7 (4)2.0 (1)5.8 (3)0.435

Beneficial in managing health after a stroke88.0 (44)84.6 (44)8.0 (4)11.5 (6)4.0 (2)3.8 (2)

Help to do home exercises independently after stroke86.0 (43)86.5 (45)8.0 (4)7.7 (4)6.0 (3)5.8 (3)0.982

Reduce the need to visit therapist often82.0 (41)88.4 (46)10.0 (5)7.7 (4)8.0 (4)3.8 (2)

Reminder for home exercise sessions92.0 (46)92.3 (48)
4.0 (2)7.7 (4)
4.0 (2)0.0 (0)

Improve awareness about stroke management84.0 (42)94.2 (49)
10.0 (5)5.8 (3)
6.0 (3)0.0 (0)

Improving access to a therapist for follow-up/suggestions86.0 (43)94.2 (49)
12.0 (6)5.8 (3)
2.0 (1)0.0 (0)

Make health information delivery faster82.0 (41)82.7 (43)
18.0 (9)15.4 (8)
0.0 (0)1.9 (1)

Ensure confidentiality and security of information collected70.0 (35)80.8 (42)
26.0 (13)19.2 (10)4.0 (2)0.0 (0)0.367

Should be made available to all stroke patients94.0 (47)86.6 (45)
4.0 (2)9.6 (5)
2.0 (1)3.8 (2)

Questions Stroke survivors Caregivers
Yes (%)No (%)Yes (%)No (%)

Given a chance, would you opt for mobile-based home exercise program?45 (90.0)5 (10.00)48 (92.3)4 (7.70)

Would you opt for such services provided at nominal cost?36 (72.0)14 (28.0)43 (82.7)9 (17.3)

What charges are you willing to pay for such services?
INR 250-50031 (86.1)38 (88.4)
INR 500-7504 (9.3)3 (8.3)
INR 750-10001 (2.3)2 (5.6)

INR=Indian Rupee.
3.3. Predictors of Acceptability and Attitude

The chi-square analysis showed no significant difference between caregivers and patients attitude (P>0.05) (Table 2). The result of logistic regression showed no difference on acceptance and attitude towards m-health between different age groups, gender, and type of phone used.

4. Discussion

This study reported the acceptance and attitude of stroke survivors and caregivers towards mobile-based home exercise program. It is important to know the acceptability because the intention to adopt a technology is determined by perceived usefulness, perceived effort, social influences, attitude towards technology, and mobile experience [21]. This study reflected the positive attitude and strong willingness of stroke survivors and caregivers towards mobile-based home exercises, which makes it a forthcoming medium to deliver home-based exercise program after stroke even in distant locations.

Some of the components, such as the use of mobile-based technology in cost reduction and in ensuring confidentiality and security of data were rated neutral by more than 15% of the participants. These responses reflect that many people were not sure about these aspects of m-health and its potential benefits to them. Hence it stresses the importance of educating patients and caregivers about the benefits of using mobile-based technology in healthcare and about safety measures followed for data protection. Participants who refused to opt for m-health were from middle to older age group who would have a fear of technology [22] and also the lack of exposure to smartphone devices would have influenced their decision. Moreover, the attributes vary based on subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and attitudes [23]. The results of this study did not indicate any significant predictors of acceptability. Hence, there is a need to address the individualistic factors qualitatively in future.

Our findings are similar to a qualitative study conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, which showed a positive attitude towards using a mobile phone for seeking health services among caregivers of children, even without having a previous experience to the interactive-voice-response system [24]. A recent study assessed the attitude of stroke patients towards m-health technology living in a developed country and showed a positive attitude towards telecommunication for blood pressure control and medication adherence [25]. Exercises are more complex and require high self-efficacy to be independently performed by people with stroke [26]. This study revealed the inclination to opt for a mobile-based home exercise program after stroke. In contrast, another study conducted in Indian population reported low acceptability among patients and moderately positive attitude towards m-health among healthcare providers [27]. The difference in the findings could be because our questions were directed at using mobile-based home exercise tool as an adjunct and not as a replacement for direct contact with healthcare providers.

Acceptability is the most appropriate implementation outcome for individual-level analysis [19]. The results of this study showed that mobile-based home exercise program has high acceptability, which could lead to better implementation. This study explored the opinions of participants living in a low-income setting with lesser resources and infrastructure. Even in a semiurban region, the participants showed readiness for technology-based rehabilitation and welcome the unconventional concept of healthcare services. Additionally, this study included the perception of caregivers who are the cornerstone of the health care team and play a crucial role in implementing any lifestyle changes for a stroke patient.

Limitations. Limitation of this study is the lack of stratification of participants based on income, education level, and duration of smartphones use that could have confounded the results. Another limitation is that the opinion of healthcare providers towards this technology was not included and it would have limited our understanding of implementing the mobile technology.

5. Conclusion

Stroke survivors and their caregivers showed remarkable acceptance and a positive attitude towards mobile-based home exercise program for stroke management even in a low-resource setting. Future studies should target treatment and cost-effectiveness of this technology in low-to-middle income countries. The results of this study can strengthen the prescription of mobile-based home exercise programs among healthcare providers and also help in improving its application for stroke survivors.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


We would like to thank Dr. Abraham S. Babu, Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India, for his support and valuable inputs in the manuscript.


  1. P. Langhorne, J. Bernhardt, and G. Kwakkel, “Stroke rehabilitation,” The Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9778, pp. 1693–1702, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. A. Billinger, R. Arena, J. Bernhardt et al., “Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 2532–2553, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Hillier and G. Inglis-Jassiem, “Rehabilitation for community-dwelling people with stroke: Home or centre based? a systematic review,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 178–186, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Free, G. Phillips, L. Galli et al., “The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behavior change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, Article ID e1001362, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. World Health Organization, “mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologie,” Observatory, vol. 3, pp. 66–71, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  6. E. M. Monninkhof, P. D. van der Valk, J. van der Palen et al., “Self-management education for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, p. CD002990, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Gokalp, J. de Folter, V. Verma, J. Fursse, R. Jones, and M. Clarke, “Integrated telehealth and telecare for monitoring frail elderly with chronic disease,” Telemedicine and e-Health, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  8. P. V. Srivastava, P. Sudhan, D. Khurana et al., “Telestroke a viable option to improve stroke care in India,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 9, no. 100, pp. 133-134, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. O. M. Dumitrascu and B. M. Demaerschalk, “Telestroke,” Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 19, article 85, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  10. C. C. Quinn, S. S. Clough, J. M. Minor, D. Lender, M. C. Okafor, and A. Gruber-Baldini, “WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction,” Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 160–168, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. L. Beatty, Y. Fukuoka, and M. A. Whooley, “Using mobile technology for cardiac rehabilitation: a review and framework for development and evaluation,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 2, no. 6, p. e000568, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Liu, W. Feng, P. Y. Chhatbar, Y. Liu, X. Ji, and B. Ovbiagele, “Mobile health as a viable strategy to enhance stroke risk factor control: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 378, pp. 140–145, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Fiordelli, N. Diviani, and P. J. Schulz, “Mapping mhealth research: a decade of evolution,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 15, no. 5, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. G. Rate, “Trai telecom subscription data as on 30th september, 2017,” Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, vol. 104, pp. 1–20, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. S. Sarfo and B. Ovbiagele, “Mobile health for stroke: a promising concept for research and practice,” mHealth, vol. 3, no. 6, p. 4, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Gameback, J. R. Zadro, D. Shirley et al., “Video-game–based exercises for older people with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlledtable trial (GAMEBACK),” Physical Therapy in Sport, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 14–27, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C.-H. Wang, P.-C. Chou, W.-C. Joa et al., “Mobile-phone-based home exercise training program decreases systemic inflammation in COPD: a pilot study,” BMC Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  18. H. A. E. Geraedts, W. Zijlstra, W. Zhang et al., “A home-based exercise program driven by tablet application and mobility monitoring for frail older adults: feasibility and practical implications,” Preventing Chronic Disease, vol. 14, no. 2, p. E12, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  19. E. Proctor, H. Silmere, R. Raghavan et al., “Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda,” Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. F. Khatun, A. E. Heywood, P. K. Ray, S. Hanifi, A. Bhuiya, and S.-T. Liaw, “Determinants of readiness to adopt mHealth in a rural community of Bangladesh,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 847–856, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Cilliers, K. L. Viljoen, and W. T. Chinyamurindi, “A study on students’ acceptance of mobile phone use to seek health information in South Africa,” Health Information Management Journal, vol. 1-11, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  22. Y.-H. Wu, S. Damnée, H. Kerhervé, C. Ware, and A.-S. Rigaud, “Bridging the digital divide in older adults: a study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, vol. 10, pp. 193–201, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  23. I. Ajzen, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Brinkel, P. Dako-Gyeke, A. Krämer, J. May, and J. N. Fobil, “An investigation of users’ attitudes, requirements and willingness to use mobile phone-based interactive voice response systems for seeking healthcare in Ghana: a qualitative study,” Public Health, vol. 4, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. Jenkins, N. Burkett, B. Ovbiagele et al., “Stroke patients and their attitudes toward mHealth monitoring to support blood pressure control and medication adherence,” mHealth, vol. 4, no. 3, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. Essery, A. W. A. Geraghty, S. Kirby, and L. Yardley, “Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: a systematic review,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 519–534, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Ganapathy, V. Kanwar, T. Bhatnagar et al., “M-Health: a critical analysis of awareness, perception, and attitude of healthcare among providers in himachal pra desh, North India,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 675–688, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Amreen Mahmood et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1416 Views | 285 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up

You are browsing a BETA version of Click here to switch back to the original design.