Investigation on the Effects of Additive on Performance and Photostability of PCDTBT:PC<sub>71</sub>BM Solar Cells

Mohammed, Endale Tsegaye; Gonfa, Bedasa Abdisa; Kedir, Fedlu; Anshebo, Teketel Yohannes

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9387406

International Journal of Photoenergy

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 9387406 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9387406

Investigation on the Effects of Additive on Performance and Photostability of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM Solar Cells

Endale Tsegaye Mohammed,¹Bedasa Abdisa Gonfa,²Fedlu Kedir,²and Teketel Yohannes Anshebo³

Academic Editor: Juan Manuel Peralta-Hernández

Received15 Apr 2019

Revised22 Nov 2019

Accepted04 Dec 2019

Published29 Dec 2019

Abstract

In this work, the effect of DIM on the PCE and photostability of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM PSCs was investigated. DIM is an effective additive in a BHJ PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell since it fulfills the requirement of a selective PC₇₁BM dissolution. PCE of the device based on PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM processed with DIM is higher than that of the reference device. In terms of the device stability, the PSCs processed with DIM showed poor stability at longer light exposure time. For the device without DIM especially as the light exposure time was increased, the device stability was better because the PCDTBT could be shielded from air by an aggregated PC₇₁BM layer. For the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM device processed with DIM, the results obtained from measurement indicates that it has a lower recombination rate. The result from IS measurement shows that for pristine PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM devices with 3% DIM, the active layer resistance is lower compared to the device without DIM. However, after irradiating the device for 5 hr, the resistance of the device processed with DIM is higher and it is consistent with decreased PCE of the aged device.

1. Introduction

In a polymer solar cell (PSC), morphology of active layers plays a decisive role in determining power conversion efficiency because charge carrier generation, recombination, and transport are all affected by morphology of the active layers formed after spin casting [1–8]. In PSCs, excitons are dissociated into free electrons and holes at the interface between the donor polymer and the acceptor fullerene [9]. To get reasonable PCE, the electrons and holes which are formed from dissociated excitons must be transported and should reach the appropriate extracting electrodes, and this requires bicontinuous paths of donor and acceptor phases. Hence, the optimum morphology of the active layer for PSCs is a trade-off between charge carrier generation and transport to the corresponding electrodes. The problem is that the ideal morphology of the active layers which strongly depends on the solubility and miscibility of the donor polymer and acceptor fullerenes cannot be formed during spin coating of the active layer. To alleviate the problem and to improve power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs, it is necessary to tune the morphology of the active layers and the following treatments are in use by researchers working in the field. They are thermal annealing, using mixed solvents, and adding suitable additives to host solvent [1, 2, 10–12].

For efficient PSCs, the BHJ donor:acceptor domain length scale of ≤10 nm with good polymer-fullerene miscibility is highly required. However, literature reports tell us that PC₇₁BM aggregate easily forms a large domain size of ~100-200 nm diameter [1, 13, 14]. In order to solve the problem of the aggregation of PC₇₁BM in polymer:fullerene systems, additives, especially di(R)alkanes with various functional groups (R), have been added to the BHJ blend solution [15], and they resulted in the significant increase of PCE. In literatures related to PSCs, the use of additives for tuning the morphology of active layers is very common and resulted in improvement of PCEs [1, 16]. It is becoming an attractive method for morphology control.

The solvent additive diiodomethane (DIM) is a commonly used additive, and the use of it has enhanced PCE in PSCs based on different polymers [17]. As observed in our laboratory, the addition of 3% of DIM as processing additives to PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM in 1,2-dichlorobenzene (DCB) has improved the power conversion efficiency. PCDTBT is insoluble in DIM while PC₇₁BM is soluble. The reason for the better solubility of PC₇₁BM in the presence of DIM is that the iodine atom bears a partial negative charge and PC₇₁BM is electrodeficient which results in strong interactions with each other [18]. Therefore, when DIM is mixed with the main solvent, it will increase the solubility of PC₇₁BM, and this results in optimal mixing of PCDTBT and PC₇₁BM and better morphology when the film of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM is formed by spin casting. There is no question that the optimal mixing will give improved PCE compared to a device processed without DIM.

However, little attention is given about the consequence of processing additives on the working lifetime of a real device. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to reveal the effect of additive on the performance and working lifetime of PSC aged by light exposure. In order to identify the effect of DIM on performance and stability of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM-based solar cells, we have fabricated the real device without DIM and 3% DIM and studied the characteristics under light irradiation. We also used impedance spectroscopy and UV-visible spectroscopy to find out the effect of DIM on the photostability of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM-based device.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Materials and Solutions

The donor polymer poly[N-9-hepta-decanyl-2,7-carbazole-alt-5,5-(4,7-di-2-thienyl-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole)] (PCDTBT) (average Mw ) used in this work was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The fullerene acceptor [6,6]‐phenyl‐C₇₁‐butyric acid methyl ester (PC₇₁BM) >99% purity, mixture of isomers, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals were used as received. The hole transporting polymer PEDOT:PSS was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (Riedel-de Haen) was used as host solvent.

2.2. Device Fabrication and Characterization

For ITO cleaning and PEDOT:PSS spin coating, we used our earlier procedure exactly, and the detail of the procedure is given in Endale et al. [19]. Prior to device fabrication, a solution consisting of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM in the blend ratio of 1 : 4 () and blend concentration of 22.5 mg/mL in 1,2-dichlorobenzene was stirred for 36 hr. PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solution was spin-casted onto a PEDOT:PSS-coated substrate at 1400 rpm for 54 s. Finally, through a shadow mask 100 nm thick, Al electrodes were vacuum evaporated using a thermal evaporator (EDWARDs 306) at a pressure of approximately Torr.

To characterize the polymer solar cell, the current-voltage characteristics were measured by using an electrochemical analyzer (Model CHI600A) under white light illumination of 100 mW/cm² from a 150 W xenon lamp of Oriel-type light source (Model 68830). All device preparation and characterization processes were done in open air. For degradation measurements in ambient air, the samples were kept in an open sample holder, exposed to white light illumination of intensity 100 mW/cm². The photovoltaic cell characteristics PCE, , , and FF were measured at different irradiation time. All devices were not sealed. UV-visible absorption spectra were measured by a UV-Vis Spectrometer Perkin Elmer Lambda 950 UV/VIS/NIR spectrometer from the 300 to 900 nm wavelength range. For UV-visible measurement, blends were spin-coated onto glass substrates using the same conditions as those of the devices.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. UV-Visible Absorbance Measurement

Figure 1 shows UV-visible absorbance spectra of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM film with 3% and without DIM. As we can see from Figure 1, there is no much difference between the UV-visible absorbance spectra of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM films with and without DIM. However, we can see a little lower absorption intensity at the high energy region and a little higher absorption intensity at the low energy region for the film processed with DIM.

Figure 2 shows the variation of normalized UV-visible absorbance of BHJ films of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM processed with and without DIM. The observation indicates that with increasing light exposure time, the BHJ films of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM processed with DIM have lower stability or higher rate of degradation compared to the BHJ film without DIM. As a consequence, it is very important to study the effect of DIM on the stability of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM-based device under light exposure in ambient air. The higher rate of photodegradation of the film of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM with DIM may be explained as follows. Due to solubility of PC₇₁BM in DIM, the addition of DIM produces homogeneous morphology between PCDTBT and PC₇₁BM. The homogeneous morphology would make more PCDTBT exposed to air, which is more easily degraded by O₂ and H₂O molecules compared to the BHJ layer without DIM.

3.2. Current Density-Voltage Characteristics

The current density-voltage characteristics () of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM devices processed with 3% and without DIM are shown in Figure 3. The PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell without DIM (reference cell) showed a PCE of 2.77%, mA/cm², , mV, and Ω·cm² whereas the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell processed with 3% DIM showed a PCE of 3.42%, mA/cm², , mV, and Ω·cm². For the solar cell processed with 3% DIM, short-circuit current density has increased by 21% and series resistance has reduced by 34%. As the result shows, the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell processed with 3% DIM has better PCE with improved short-circuit current density and reduced series resistance.

For the solar cell without DIM, the formation of heavily aggregated PC₇₁BM results in lower intercalation into PCDTBT domains, thereby lowering the PCDTBT-PC₇₁BM interface area and exciton dissociation. However, when DIM is used, it selectively dissolves PC₇₁BM aggregates promoting formation of smaller domains and greater PCDTBT-PC₇₁BM interpenetration within the film and optimizing the PCDTBT-PC₇₁BM interface and which in turn result in higher exciton splitting. The existence of bicontinuous paths for the transport of holes and electrons facilitates charge carrier transport. The improved dissociation of excitons and good charge collection efficiency lead to better power conversion efficiency.

The increased short-circuit current density for the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM device processed with 3% DIM can be explained as follows. DCB is not the best solvent for PC₇₁BM. When PC₇₁BM is dissolved in DCB, large PC₇₁BM grains are formed [3, 18]. When PSC is fabricated using PC₇₁BM as the acceptor, the large PC₇₁BM grains could hinder the exciton migration to the donor/acceptor (D/A) interface, thereby limiting the charge separation in the BHJ layer [20]. The addition of solvent processing additive affects the size of fullerene and enhances bicontinuous channel formation within the BHJ composite resulting in higher [16, 21–24]. When DIM is mixed with the DCB, PC₇₁BM grain boundary size is reduced in the BHJ active layer. As PC₇₁BM aggregates are diminished, there will be a higher interface area between PCDTBT and PC₇₁BM and better bicontinuous channels for charge carrier transport, and this results in higher . Therefore, the addition of DIM is responsible for higher relative to the device processed without DIM.

When DIM is added, the reduced value of indicates that the morphology induced by DIM made charge carrier transport easy in the active layer of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM. Therefore, improved combined with decreased mean that the morphology of the active layer processed with 3% DIM permitted more efficient charge carrier generation and transport to the electrodes compared to the device processed without DIM.

3.3. Effect of DIM on Charge Carrier Generation

In case of a weak voltage dependence of the photocurrent density and negligible nongeminate recombination at high reverse bias, information about charge carrier generation can be obtained directly from the curve. The solar cell total current density () can be expressed as a combination of the dark diode current density () and the photocurrent density () [3, 25]: where is the elementary charge, is the thickness of the active layer, is the generation rate of bound electron-hole pairs per unit volume, and is the charge collection probability [3, 26].

From Equations (1) and (2), photocurrent density () of the polymer solar cell is given by the following equation:

When sufficiently large reverse bias is applied, since the internal field is large enough to sweep out all the charge carriers to the respective electrodes (nongeminate recombination can be neglected) and Equation (3) becomes

From Equation (4), the generation rate is given by

From the measured saturated current density at -1.0 V (), the generation rates for the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells processed without and with 3% DIM are calculated. For the device processed with 3% DIM, cm⁻³ s⁻¹, whereas for the device processed without 3% DIM, cm⁻³ s⁻¹. A lower generation rate for devices without 3% DIM is in agreement with a large domain phase separation in PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM blend because of lower solubility of PC₇₁BM in DCB. When the interface area is lower, excitons undergo geminate recombination because they may not find the interface area for dissociation in their lifetime. Excitons not able to find the interface area undergo geminate recombination. However, when there is a higher interface area, the excitons can get the interface area within their diffusion length and lifetime and get dissociated. The higher generation rate for the device processed with 3% DIM indicates that the effect of DIM is to suppress the formation of the large fullerene clusters, leading to a smaller length scale of the polymer and fullerene phases and an increase of the effective interfacial area for efficient exciton splitting. The results obtained from our measurements are consistent with experimental results reported on the effect of additives by different groups [13, 14, 27].

In order to understand the origin of higher performance of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell with 3% DIM, we have investigated the recombination mechanisms in the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell with and without 3% DIM under different illumination intensities. Since exciton quenching of the bulk heterojunction is strongly related to the charge recombination, investigation of the light intensity dependence of the characteristics helps to probe the dominant recombination mechanism that affects device performance. Therefore, recombination kinetics can be illustrated by the investigation of variations of as the function of the light intensity. Figure 4 presents the light intensity dependence of for the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell processed with and without DIM. Figure 4 reveals that for the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell without DIM, has slight nonlinear dependence on light intensity. However, the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell with DIM shows good linear dependence on light intensity. The dependence of on light intensity is given by the power law [3, 28]: where is the light intensity. In principle, the observance of indicates that all the charge carriers have been removed prior to recombination (i.e., bimolecular recombination is negligible (maximum carrier sweep out)) [3, 25, 29]. Deviation from is attributed to nongeminate recombination [24] and space charge effects [30, 31]. For the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell without DIM, corresponding to the power law fit of Equation (6). However, for the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell with DIM, is observed. Based on the obtained values of , it is possible to expect higher nongeminate recombination in the device processed without DIM. For the device processed with DIM, value more close to unity undoubtedly shows that bimolecular/nongeminate recombination is appreciably suppressed relative to the device without DIM. That is, charge carrier sweep out is the most effective in the device where DIM was used. The obtained results prove that 3% DIM can be used to enhance charge carrier generation and transport which result in improved PCE [32].

3.4. Effect of DIM on the Stability of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM Solar Cells

In order to study the effect of DIM on the stability of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells exposed to continuous illumination of 100 mW/cm² light, solar cells processed with and without DIM were fabricated in open air and their PCEs were compared. The PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells processed without and with 3% DIM were illuminated with 100 mW/cm² light while taking the measurements, and the curve is given in Figure 5. Qualitative analysis of Figure 5 implies that for both kinds of devices, PCE, , FF, and decreased with increasing irradiation time and this can be related with bleaching or/and the degradation of the morphology, the active layer-electrode contact, oxidation of metal electrode, etc. Bleaching of the polymer results in lower absorption of photons. When morphology degrades, it results in an increased rate of exciton and free charge carrier recombination, decreased charge carrier transport to the electrodes, and reduced PCE of the device.

(a)

(b)

The normalized values of PCE are given in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6, there is a relatively lower rate of decrease of PCE for the device processes with 3% DIM compared to the reference device until irradiation time of 210 min. The results demonstrated that the morphology of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM film is controlled by the addition of 3% DIM and hence improved the stability of the power conversion efficiency of the devices. Under light irradiation, device performance stability in the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM film treated with DIM is due to the improved solubility and reduction of aggregation of PC₇₁BM in the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM BHJ film which facilitated the efficient exciton dissociation and charge transport to the electrode. In the absence of DIM, aggregation of PC₇₁BM already formed due to lower solubility of PC₇₁BM continuously grows larger and larger and results in a higher rate of geminate and nongeminate recombinations; however, when there is DIM, it hinders aggregation of PC₇₁BM at least for some time.

On the other hand, beyond 210 min, for the device processed with 3% DIM, the performance drops on the same fashion with the reference device indicating that the advantage obtained from DIM begins to fade away with time. The reduction of photovoltaic performance is due to inadequate morphology for the efficient dissociation of excitons, charge transportation, and extraction [16]. The obtained result shows that in the long run at ambient condition and continuous irradiation, the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell processed with 3% DIM has lower environmental stability.

Wang et al. [33] found out that bilayer PSCs show more stable performance than the BHJ PSCs in air condition due to the shielding effect of the PCBM layer. The PTB7 polymer processed with diiodooctane (DIO) showed an increased PTB7 on the film surface because large aggregated PC₇₁BM domains dissolved and integrated into PTB7 domains [1]. Because of exposure of the polymer to air, PSCs processed with additives undergo degradation faster than the unprocessed device [34–37]. Based on literature results, it may be the case that the BHJ film of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM processed with DIM shows an increased PCDTBT content on the film surface because large aggregated PC₇₁BM domains dissolved and integrated into PCDTBT domains. Consequently, in the long run, the BHJ layer of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM processed with DIM degraded more easily in the air compared to the device without DIM.

The rates of decrease of normalized for devices with and without DIM are shown in Figure 7. From the time of fabrication until irradiation time of 150 min, the device with DIM had a lower rate of decrease of ; however, after 150 min, the rate of decay of had increased in comparison with the device without DIM. The result implies that at ambient condition and continuous irradiation for longer time, the solvent additive DIM contributes for the decrease of of the solar cell and it has harmful effect on the PCE.

Figure 8 shows measurements of the dark current, solar cell current, dark current minus solar cell current, and dark current minus reverse saturation current of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell processed with 3% DIM and illuminated with solar illumination intensity of 40 mW/cm² in ambient air. In Figure 8, the dark current minus reverse saturation current () curve is the estimate of the response that the solar cell would have in the absence of any recombination. In Figure 8, the curve of dark current minus reverse saturation current shows that recombination mainly reduces the fill factor and open-circuit voltage of the solar cell.

Figure 9 shows that the FF of both devices processed with and without DIM decreased continuously upon light irradiation. Based on Figure 8, charge carrier recombination is the cause for lower FF measured after light exposure. As Figure 9 shows, until irradiation time of 150 min, the solar cell processed with 3% DIM had a relatively lower rate of reduction in FF compared to the solar cell processes without DIM. However, after irradiation time of 150 min, the solar cell processed with 3% DIM showed continuous increase in the rate of reduction of FF compared to the device without DIM. Again, similar to the case of , in the long run, the additive DIM has negative effect on the FF of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell exposed to light at ambient condition.

The rate in reduction of of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell processed without and with 3% DIM as a function of irradiation (100 mW/cm²) time at ambient air is given in Figure 10. The results indicate that the devices processed with DIM has a lower rate of reduction compared to the reference device in the study time. However, close examination of the result in Figure 10 (especially the last three values) indicates that after longer exposure time, the device processed with DIM may not have stable and will give a reduced value.

Figure 11 shows the variation of normalized series resistance for the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell processed without and with 3% DIM as a function of irradiation (100 mW/cm²) time at ambient air. The obtained values reveal that with irradiation time, the series resistance of the device with DIM is continuously increasing. The increased is consistent with the reduction of after aging the device with light irradiation. The increased is also the cause for the lower FF of the device processed with DIM.

3.5. Impedance Analysis

In PSC, electrical property of the BHJ blend film is dictated by the morphology characteristics. Therefore, making connection between film morphology and electrical properties is very indispensable. Impedance spectroscopy (IS) allows the possibility of making a reasonable cause-effect relation between the morphology of the BHJ and the performance of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells at different times of irradiation.

As literature shows, IS has been widely used in determining the electric characteristics through simple equivalent circuit models in PSCs [38]. The interfaces of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells can be considered as simple elements such as resistances and capacitances in circuit models. With the representation of the interfaces and BHJ film as resistances and capacitances, the electrical properties of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM BHJ layer can be connected to current density-voltage () characteristics of the devices. In PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells, the interface between the PCDTBT and PC₇₁BM in the BHJ can directly relate to the morphology of the BHJ, and the morphology of the BHJ directly affects performance of the device. To analyze the relationship between the morphology and the device performance of the solar cell based on PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM and with and without 3% DIM under different aging times, we used the IS method.

Let us assume that in the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell, corresponds to the resistance of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM active layer and the interface between PEDOT:PSS/PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM and PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM/Al. corresponds to the resistance of the electrodes and wires connected for measurement. Since both PSCs have the same device structure, only the BHJ PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM blend is processed under different conditions. Thus, inside all the cells can be assumed to be the same. However, can give us information about the resistance which is affected by solvent additives, DIM.

Figure 12 shows the IS results of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells processed with and without 3% DIM. In Figure 12, the radius of the Cole-Cole plot is higher for the device processed without DIM, and this implies that the resistance of the whole device is higher compared to the device processed with 3% DIM. The pristine PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells processed without 3% DIM show of 3725 Ω. On the other hand, PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells processed with 3% DIM have much reduced of 682 Ω. The much lower value of of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells processed with 3% DIM implies that the thin film morphology of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM blend was much improved through the higher interfacial area between PCDTBT and PC₇₁BM due to addition of DIM.

The smaller value of for the device treated with DIM indicates a slower charge recombination and a smaller dark current [39, 40]. The smallest value in DIM-treated devices implies that the DIM allows more effective suppression of the recombination of charge carriers in the cells and lower charge transport resistance. The result obtained from IS is consistent with the recombination results previously obtained.

From literatures, we know that mixing additive with polymer:PC₇₁BM blend can lead to more favorable morphology of the polymer:PC₇₁BM BHJ due to decreasing the size of PC₇₁BM and increasing the interface area between the polymer chains and PC₇₁BM molecules [18, 41]. The result from the Cole-Cole plot in Figure 12 shows that the resistance decreased after mixing 3% DIM with PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM blend. Without DIM, the PC₇₁BM aggregates are large and hinder PC₇₁BM intercalation into the PCDTBT network during film formation, so large segregated domains with the lower interface area form (Figure 13) and increased the resistance. On the contrary, as shown in Figure 13, when DIM is added, the PC₇₁BM aggregates dissolve and the higher interface area between PCDTBT chain and PC₇₁BM molecules will be formed, and as a result, the resistance decreases. Based on the general effect of additives and the result of resistance measurement, the sound logical inference is that in addition of DIM the interface area between PCDTBT chains and PC₇₁BM molecules should be increased so that the resistance decreases.

(a)

(b)

Figure 14 is the Cole-Cole plots of the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells processed with and without 3% DIM of pristine and 5 hr irradiated device. In Figure 14 for both devices, the radius of the Cole-Cole plot increased after irradiating the device for 5 hr at ambient air, which implies that the resistance of the whole device has increased. The cause for increase of after light irradiation is the decrease of the interface area between the PCDTBT and PC₇₁BM. As the interface area decreases in PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM due to PC₇₁BM aggregate formation, the separation of exciton and penetration of carriers in the BHJ layer reduced.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the effect of DIM on the PCE and stability of PSCs made of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM was investigated. DIM is an effective additive in the BHJ PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cell since it fulfills the requirement of a selective PC₇₁BM dissolution. PCE of the device based on PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM processed with DIM is higher than the reference device without DIM. The device without DIM has lower short-circuit current density. The reason is that without DIM, the PC₇₁BM aggregates are large which hinder PC₇₁BM intercalation into the PCDTBT network during film formation, and this creates large, segregated domains of PCDTBT and PC₇₁BM. As a result of the reduced interface area, there will be lower exciton dissociation at the interface. However, on DIM addition, the PC₇₁BM aggregates dissolve, and this facilitates integration of the PC₇₁BM molecules into the PCDTBT system resulting in a greater PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM interface area and smaller domains. Because of the higher interface area, there will be a higher rate of exciton dissociation, and this results in higher short-circuit current density.

In terms of the device stability, PSCs processed with DIM showed poor stability at longer light exposure time. For the device without DIM especially as the light exposure time was increased, the device stability was better. The obtained result tells us that using the solvent additive DIM in the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells not only affects PCE of the device but also affects its working lifetime. Hence, while using DIM to enhance PCE of PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM solar cells, it is good to consider the stability of the device. For the PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM device processed with DIM, the results obtained from measurement indicate that it has a lower recombination rate. The result from IS measurement shows that for pristine PCDTBT:PC₇₁BM devices with 3% DIM, the active layer resistance is lower compared to the device without DIM. However, after irradiating the device for 5 hr, the resistance of the device processed with DIM is higher, and it is consistent with decreased PCE of the aged device.

Data Availability

All types of data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Endale Tsegaye gratefully acknowledges the “Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP),” the ICTP Programme for Training and Research in Italian Laboratories (TRIL), for financial support (Budget code: 421.FITU.21.G). This research work was partially supported by IOM-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Budget code: 42100IOM09).

References

W. Kim, J. K. Kim, E. Kim, T. K. Ahn, D. H. Wang, and J. H. Park, “Conflicted effects of a solvent additive on PTB7:PC₇₁BM bulk heterojunction solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 11, pp. 5954–5961, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-W. Su, C. M. Liu, J. M. Jiang et al., “Structural evolution of crystalline conjugated polymer/fullerene domains from solution to the solid state in the presence and absence of an additive,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 3408–3417, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, X. Hu, C. Zhong et al., “The influence of binary processing additives on the performance of polymer solar cells,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 23, pp. 14297–14304, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kniepert, I. Lange, J. Heidbrink et al., “Effect of solvent additive on generation, recombination, and extraction in PTB7:PCBM solar cells: a conclusive experimental and numerical simulation study,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 15, pp. 8310–8320, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Guo, D. Lee, R. D. Schaller et al., “Relationship between interchain interaction, exciton delocalization, and charge separation in low-bandgap copolymer blends,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 28, pp. 10024–10032, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Barker, K. Chen, and J. M. Hodgkiss, “Distance distributions of photogenerated charge pairs in organic photovoltaic cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 34, pp. 12018–12026, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Etzold, I. A. Howard, N. Forler et al., “The effect of solvent additives on morphology and excited-state dynamics in PCPDTBT:PCBM photovoltaic blends,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, no. 25, pp. 10569–10583, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Howard, R. Mauer, M. Meister, and F. Laquai, “Effect of morphology on ultrafast free carrier generation in polythiophene:fullerene organic solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 42, pp. 14866–14876, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Shen, G. Han, D. Fan, Y. Xie, and Y. Yi, “Hot charge-transfer states determine exciton dissociation in the DTDCTB/C₆₀ Complex for organic solar cells: a theoretical insight,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 21, pp. 11320–11326, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gerhard, A. P. Arndt, I. A. Howard, A. Rahimi-Iman, U. Lemmer, and M. Koch, “Temperature- and energy-dependent separation of charge-transfer states in PTB7-based organic solar cells,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 51, pp. 28309–28318, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Tournebize, A. Rivaton, H. Peisert, and T. Chassé, “The crucial role of confined residual additives on the photostability of P3HT:PCBM active layers,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 17, pp. 9142–9148, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Scharber, C. Lungenschmied, H.-J. Egelhaaf et al., “Charge transfer excitons in low band gap polymer based solar cells and the role of processing additives,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 12, p. 5077, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Collins, Z. Li, J. R. Tumbleston, E. Gann, C. R. McNeill, and H. Ade, “Absolute measurement of domain composition and nanoscale size distribution explains performance in PTB7:PC₇₁BM solar cells,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Hedley, A. J. Ward, A. Alekseev et al., “Determining the optimum morphology in high-performance polymer-fullerene organic photovoltaic cells,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2867, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Lee, W. L. Ma, C. J. Brabec et al., “Processing additives for improved efficiency from bulk heterojunction solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 130, no. 11, pp. 3619–3623, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ok and Y. Choe, “Effect of processing additives on PCDTBT:PC₆₀BM based organic photovoltaic cells,” Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, vol. 586, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ergete, F. K. Sabir, Y. Li, and T. Yohannes, “Effect of solvent additives and P3HT on PDTSTTz/PCBM-based bulk heterojunction solar cells,” Journal of Photonics for Energy, vol. 5, no. 1, article 057209, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Lou, J. M. Szarko, T. Xu, L. Yu, T. J. Marks, and L. X. Chen, “Effects of additives on the morphology of solution phase aggregates formed by active layer components of high-efficiency organic solar cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 51, pp. 20661–20663, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Endale, E. Sovernigo, A. Radivo et al., “Investigation of photodegradation in polymer solar cells blended with different fullerenes derivatives,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 123, pp. 150–158, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. C. Greenham, X. Peng, and A. P. Alivisatos, “Charge separation and transport in conjugated-polymer/semiconductor-nanocrystal composites studied by photoluminescence quenching and photoconductivity,” Physical Review B, vol. 54, no. 24, pp. 17628–17637, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. L. Schulz, M. Urdanpilleta, R. Fitzner et al., “Optimization of solution-processed oligothiophene:fullerene based organic solar cells by using solvent additives,” Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 4, pp. 680–689, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Moon, C. J. Takacs, S. Cho et al., “Effect of processing additive on the nanomorphology of a bulk heterojunction material,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 4005–4008, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yao, J. Hou, Z. Xu, G. Li, and Y. Yang, “Effects of solvent mixtures on the nanoscale phase separation in polymer solar cells,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1783–1789, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ye, S. Zhang, W. Ma et al., “From binary to ternary solvent: morphology fine-tuning of D/A blends in PDPP3T-based polymer solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 47, pp. 6335–6341, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Street, M. Schoendorf, A. Roy, and J. H. Lee, “Interface state recombination in organic solar cells,” Physical Review B, vol. 81, no. 20, article 205307, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Cowan, R. A. Street, S. Cho, and A. J. Heeger, “Transient photoconductivity in polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells: competition between sweep-out and recombination,” Physical Review B, vol. 83, no. 3, article 035205, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Liu, W. Zhao, J. R. Tumbleston et al., “Understanding the morphology of PTB7:PCBM blends in organic photovoltaics,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 4, no. 5, article 1301377, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Riedel, J. Parisi, V. Dyakonov, L. Lutsen, D. Vanderzande, and J. C. Hummelen, “Effect of temperature and illumination on the electrical characteristics of polymer–fullerene bulk-heterojunction solar cells,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Jung, J. W. Jo, C.-C. Chueh et al., “Fluoro-substituted n-type conjugated polymers for additive-free all-polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells with high power conversion efficiency of 6.71%,” Advanced Materials, vol. 27, no. 21, pp. 3310–3317, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Li, F. Gao, N. C. Greenham, and C. R. McNeill, “Comparison of the operation of polymer/fullerene, polymer/polymer, and polymer/nanocrystal solar cells: a transient photocurrent and photovoltage study,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1419–1431, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lenes, M. Morana, C. J. Brabec, and P. W. M. Blom, “Recombination-limited photocurrents in low bandgap polymer/fullerene solar cells,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1106–1111, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Schilinsky, C. Waldauf, and C. J. Brabec, “Recombination and loss analysis in polythiophene based bulk heterojunction photodetectors,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, no. 20, pp. 3885–3887, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Wang, J. K. Kim, O. O. Park, and J. H. Park, “Analysis of surface morphological changes in organic photovoltaic devices: bilayer versus bulk-heterojunction,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 1434, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Neugebauer, C. Brabec, J. C. Hummelen, and N. S. Sariciftci, “Stability and photodegradation mechanisms of conjugated polymer/fullerene plastic solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Norrman and F. C. Krebs, “Lifetimes of organic photovoltaics: Using TOF-SIMS and ¹⁸O₂ isotopic labelling to characterise chemical degradation mechanisms,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 213–227, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chambon, A. Rivaton, J.-L. Gardette, M. Firon, and L. Lutsen, “Aging of a donor conjugated polymer: photochemical studies of the degradation of poly[2-methoxy-5-(3,7-dimethyloctyloxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene],” Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 317–331, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Norrman, S. A. Gevorgyan, and F. C. Krebs, “Water-induced degradation of polymer solar cells studied by H₂¹⁸O labeling,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 102–112, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-J. Jin, J. Jo, and J.-W. Yoo, “Impedance spectroscopy analysis on the effects of TiO₂ interfacial atomic layers in ZnO nanorod polymer solar cells: effects of interfacial charge extraction on diffusion and recombination,” Organic Electronics, vol. 19, pp. 83–91, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Kim, S. Ahn, D. H. Wang, and C. E. Park, “The effect of processing additives for charge generation, recombination, and extraction in bulk heterojunction layers of all-polymer photovoltaics,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 107, no. 6, article 063302, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dualeh, T. Moehl, N. Tetreault et al., “Impedance spectroscopic analysis of lead iodide perovskite-sensitized solid-state solar cells,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 362–373, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liang, Z. Xu, J. Xia et al., “For the bright future—bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. E135–E138, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Endale Tsegaye Mohammed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

906

Downloads

763

Citations