Assessing Magnetic Susceptibility Profiles of Topsoils under Different Occupations

<div>Interdependence between <svg height="9.59912pt" id="M75" style="vertical-align:-3.63821pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 16.0174 9.59912" width="16.0174pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M565 434L556 448L482 423L322 189L287 373C280 410 261 448 236 448C207 448 161 415 110 338L131 317C160 355 181 374 193 374C204 374 208 366 217 330C230 279 247 185 259 116L50 -175C18 -223 29 -260 41 -278H51C97 -198 207 -33 270 57L313 -165C328 -235 349 -261 376 -261S445 -244 510 -150L487 -127C444 -178 423 -186 411 -186C402 -186 398 -177 387 -130C371 -62 349 39 332 135C390 217 524 392 565 434Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.981,3.132)"><path d="M56 439L27 407L32 396H103V106C103 41 96 35 31 30V0H271V29C191 37 184 40 184 110V396H293C304 404 309 428 303 439H184V473C183 558 195 604 207 623S234 653 261 653C293 653 322 635 341 616C350 607 360 606 370 614C381 622 386 631 389 638C394 652 393 664 384 675C366 696 339 708 303 710C263 705 225 686 190 655C137 608 121 561 114 538S103 487 103 456V439H56Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,10.469,3.132)"><path d="M526 56L493 58C457 61 448 68 448 119V710C411 697 344 682 288 675V646C362 641 367 639 367 573V439C344 448 315 451 300 451C164 451 40 342 40 202C40 61 147 -12 227 -12C239 -12 266 -7 305 16L367 53V-12C427 10 505 21 526 26V56ZM367 88C342 69 306 54 271 54C207 54 133 111 133 229C133 373 219 409 264 409C301 409 342 394 367 359V88Z"></path></g></svg> and <svg height="9.59912pt" id="M76" style="vertical-align:-3.63821pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 13.5603 9.59912" width="13.5603pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M565 434L556 448L482 423L322 189L287 373C280 410 261 448 236 448C207 448 161 415 110 338L131 317C160 355 181 374 193 374C204 374 208 366 217 330C230 279 247 185 259 116L50 -175C18 -223 29 -260 41 -278H51C97 -198 207 -33 270 57L313 -165C328 -235 349 -261 376 -261S445 -244 510 -150L487 -127C444 -178 423 -186 411 -186C402 -186 398 -177 387 -130C371 -62 349 39 332 135C390 217 524 392 565 434Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.981,3.132)"><path d="M244 0V30C178 35 170 41 170 107V710C136 697 72 680 18 675V647C83 642 89 639 89 572V107C89 43 80 35 16 30V0H244Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.347,3.132)"><path d="M56 439L27 407L32 396H103V106C103 41 96 35 31 30V0H271V29C191 37 184 40 184 110V396H293C304 404 309 428 303 439H184V473C183 558 195 604 207 623S234 653 261 653C293 653 322 635 341 616C350 607 360 606 370 614C381 622 386 631 389 638C394 652 393 664 384 675C366 696 339 708 303 710C263 705 225 686 190 655C137 608 121 561 114 538S103 487 103 456V439H56Z"></path></g></svg> for reforested land.</div>

International Journal of Geophysics

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Assessing Magnetic Susceptibility Profiles of Topsoils under Different Occupations 