Research Article
Modeling Growth and Yield of Schizolobium amazonicum under Different Spacings
Table 3
Statistics obtained for the scenarios evaluated by considering results of estimation and validation for Strategies A and B.
| Scenario | Strategy A | Strategy B | | Bias | Bias% | RMSE | RMSE% | | Bias | Bias% | RMSE | RMSE% |
| Estimation |
| Total volume | S1 | 38.32 | −15.24 | −9.36 | 25.35 | 15.58 | 45.28 | 8.00 | 4.91 | 23.88 | 14.67 | S2 | 43.84 | −14.89 | −9.15 | 24.19 | 14.86 | 49.97 | 7.80 | 4.79 | 22.83 | 14.03 | S3 | 95.32 | −4.80 | −3.15 | 8.22 | 5.39 | 93.80 | −4.64 | −2.85 | 8.03 | 4.93 |
| Commercial volume | S1 | 8.56 | −8.11 | −11.16 | 13.93 | 19.17 | 7.03 | 4.74 | 6.53 | 13.84 | 19.05 | S2 | 26.79 | −8.12 | −11.18 | 14.40 | 19.83 | 11.31 | 4.66 | 6.41 | 13.49 | 18.58 | S3 | 62.82 | −3.09 | −4.26 | 7.80 | 10.73 | 67.24 | 3.83 | 5.28 | 7.32 | 10.08 |
| Validation |
| Total volume | S1 | 36.97 | −10.05 | −7.08 | 32.10 | 22.61 | 36.24 | −7.30 | −5.14 | 32.29 | 22.74 | S2 | 42.73 | −16.61 | −11.70 | 30.60 | 21.54 | 47.50 | −5.03 | −3.54 | 29.30 | 20.63 | S3 | 90.55 | −9.86 | −6.94 | 12.42 | 8.74 | 98.64 | −1.32 | −0.93 | 4.71 | 3.31 |
| Commercial volume | S1 | 2.32 | −16.77 | −27.42 | 22.25 | 36.37 | 6.31 | −3.46 | −5.66 | 16.54 | 27.04 | S2 | 3.00 | −11.74 | −19.19 | 17.19 | 28.10 | 15.90 | −2.74 | −4.48 | 15.67 | 25.61 | S3 | 60.75 | −8.30 | −13.58 | 10.70 | 17.50 | 86.15 | −0.15 | −0.25 | 6.35 | 10.39 |
|
|