Research Article
Tree Growth Prediction in Relation to Simple Set of Site Quality Indicators for Six Native Tree Species in the Philippines
Table 1
Tree-site matching from three different methodological perspectives.
| Perspective | Step | Step | Step |
| Tree: | | | | What are suitable sites for this tree species (given its provenance)? | Calculate performance relative to “reference” | Identify “growth retarding” factors: landscape position, soil type, soil physics, soil chemical factors | Map relative suitability based on combined model for each tree species |
| Site: | | | | What are the best tree species for this site? | Derive efficient site typology | Combine relative performance per tree species with expected value for the farmer | List the “best bet” tree species for each site |
| Farmer: | | | | Based on what information can I judge whether a given tree & site combination will be productive? | In Tree—Step : calculate stepwise adjusted R2: what gain in precision can be obtained with more complete information | Compare costs of obtaining various site indicators to the expected gain in predictive power of performance | Evaluate cost-benefit of modified choice based on better information |
|
|