(a) |
| Fish/seafood | Ethnicity | Age | Follow-up years | Fish/seafood type | Fish/seafood consumption (highest versus lowest) (range) | Number of participants | Quartile | Adjustment for T2D risk factors | Quality score (0–12) | Adjusted RR (95% CI) |
|
Nanri et al. 2011A | Japan | 40–59 | 10 | Total fish/seafood | 166.6 g/d versus 35.9 g/d (130.7 g/d) | 52680 | 4 | Age, BMI, family history of diabetes mellitus, total physical activity, vegetable, fruit, and meat | 11 | 0.84 (0.62–1.15) |
Villegas et al. 2011B | China | 40–74 | 4.1–8.9 | Total fish/shellfish | 99.2 g/d versus 14.0 g/d (85.2 g/d) | 116129 | 5 | Age, BMI, physical activity, family history of diabetes, and dietary pattern (vegetable, fruit, and meat) | 11 | 0.87 (0.78–0.97) |
Patel et al. 2009C | Norwich, England | 40–79 | 7.5 | Total fish/seafood | >14.28 g/d versus <14.28 g/d (14.28 g/d) | 21984 | 2 | Age, BMI, family history of diabetes, and physical activity | 7 | 0.76 (0.59–0.96) |
Patel et al. 2012K | Europe | 55–63 | 6.9 | Total fish/seafood | >51.8 g/d versus <15 g/d | 24813 | 4 | Age, BMI, physical activity, fruit, and vegetable intake | 8 | 0.99 (0.86–1.15) |
Montonen et al. 2005J | Finland | 40–69 | 23 | Total fish | >0 versus 0 g/d | 4304 | 4 | Age, BMI, and family history of diabetes | 6 | 0.96 (0.71–1.29) |
Schulze et al. 2003D | US | 26–46 | 8 | Total fish | >28.57 g/d versus <14.28 g/d (28.57 g/d) | 91246 | N/A | Age, BMI, physical activity, and family history of diabetes | 8 | 1.04 (0.82–1.32) |
Djoussé et al. 2011E | US | >45 | 12.4 | Total fish/seafood | 56.14 g/d versus 6.71 g/d (49.43 g/d) | 36328 | 5 | Age, BMI, parental history of diabetes, physical activity, and meat | 8 | 1.49 (1.30–1.70) |
Djoussé et al. 2011F | US | >65 | 15 | Total fish | >71.43 g/d versus <3.3 g/d (71.43 g/d) | 2831 | 5 | Age, BMI, and physical activity | 6 | 1.07 (0.35, 3.33) |
Kaushik et al. 2009G | US | 26–78 | 14.5–18.5 | Total fish (finfish) | >71.43 g/d versus <3.3 g/d (78.57 g/d) | 195204 | 5 | Physical activity, family history of diabetes mellitus, and BMI | 7 | 1.22 (1.08–1.38) |
Van Woudenbergh et al. 2009H | Dutch | >55 | 12 | Total fish/seafood | 35.6 g/d versus 0 g/d (35.6 g/d) | 4472 | 4 | Age | 5 | 1.32 (1.02–1.70) |
|
|
(b) |
| Fish | Ethnicity | Age | Follow-up years | Fish type | Fish consumption | Number of participants | Quartile | Adjustment for T2D risk factors | Quality score | Adjusted RR (95% CI) |
|
Nanri et al. 2011A | Japan | 40–59 | 10 | Fresh fish | 95.4 g/d versus 13.6 g/d (81.8 g/d) | 52680 | 4 | Age, BMI, family history of diabetes mellitus, physical activity, vegetable, fruit, and meat | 11 | 0.91 (0.73–1.13) |
Villegas et al. 2011B | China | 40–74 | 4.1–8.9 | Fish | 79.6 g/d versus 9.6 g/d (70 g/d) | 116156 | 5 | Age, BMI, physical activity, family history of diabetes, and dietary pattern (vegetable, fruit, and meat) | 11 | 0.90 (0.80–1.01) |
Kaushik et al. 2009G | US | 26–78 | 14.5–18.5 | Finfish | >71.43 g/d versus <3.3 g/d (78.57 g/d) | 195204 | 5 | Physical activity, family history of diabetes, and BMI | 7 | 1.22 (1.08–1.38) |
Montonen et al. 2005J | Finland | 40–69 | 23 | Total fish | >0 versus 0 g/d | 4304 | 4 | Age, BMI, and family history of diabetes | 6 | 0.96 (0.71–1.29) |
Patel et al. 2009C | Norwich, England | 40–79 | 7.5 | White fish, oily fish | >14.28 g/d versus <14.28 g/d (14.28 g/d) | 21984 | 2 | Age, BMI, family history of diabetes, and physical activity | 7 | 0.90 (0.79–1.03) |
Patel et al. 2012K | Europe | 55–63 | 6.9 | Total fish | >34.9 g/d versus <2.9 g/d | 24813 | 4 | Age, BMI, physical activity, fruit, and vegetable intake | 8 | 1.06 (0.92–1.22) |
Van Woudenbergh et al. 2009H | Dutch | >55 | 12 | Lean fish, fatty fish | 46.3 g/d versus 0 (46.3 g/d) | 4472 | 4 | Age | 5 | 1.16 (0.89–1.51) |
|
|
(c) |
| LC n-3 PUFA | Ethnicity | Age | Follow-up years | LC n-3 PUFA type | LC n-3 PUFA consumption | Number of participants | Quartile | Adjustment for T2D risk factors | Quality score | Adjusted RR (95% CI) |
|
Villegas et al. 2011B | China | 40–74 | 4.1–8.9 | EPA, DHA | 0.2 g/d versus 0.02 g/d (0.18 g/d) | 64193 | 5 | Age, BMI, physical activity, family history of diabetes, and dietary pattern (vegetable, fruit, and meat) | 11 | 0.85 (0.76–0.95) |
Brostow et al. 2011I | Singapore, Chinese | 45–74 | 6 | EPA, DHA | 0.6 g/d versus 0.11 g/d (0.49 g/d) | 43175 | 5 | Age, BMI, and physical activity | 7 | 0.93 (0.77–1.11) |
Kaushik et al. 2009G | US | 26–78 | 14.5–18.5 | EPA, DHA | 0.46 g/d versus 0.07 g/d (0.37 g/d) | 195204 | 5 | Physical activity, family history of diabetes, and BMI | 7 | 1.24 (1.09–1.41) |
Djoussé et al. 2011E | US | >45 | 12.4 | EPA, DHA | 0.39 g/d versus 0.05 g/d (0.34 g/d) | 36328 | 5 | Age, BMI, parental history of diabetes, physical activity, and meat | 8 | 1.45 (1.32–1.59) |
Djoussé et al. 2011F | US | >65 | 15 | EPA, DHA | >0.56 g/d versus <0.17 g/d (0.6 g/d) | 3088 | 4 | Age, BMI, and physical activity | 6 | 1.04 (0.67–1.61) |
Van Woudenbergh et al. 2009H | Dutch | >55 | 12 | EPA, DHA | 0.237 g/d versus 0.024 g/d (0.21 g/d) | 4472 | 3 | Age | 5 | 1.22 (0.97–1.53) |
|
|
A–I: A: T2D was assessed by Japanese criteria [12]; B: T2D was assessed by ADA criteria [13]; C: T2D was assessed by other resource and hospital records [16]; D: T2D was assessed by NDDG criteria [17]; E: T2D was assessed by ADA criteria [14]; F: T2D was assessed by medication use and fasting/nonfasting glucose level in plasma [20]; G: T2D was assessed by NDDG criteria [15]; H: T2D was assessed by ADA/WHO criteria [18]; I: T2D was self-reported [19]; J: T2D was assessed by physician according to diabetic criteria [22]; K: T2D was assessed by multiple sources [21].
|