Implementation of TAGE Method Using Seikkala Derivatives Applied to Two-Point Fuzzy Boundary Value Problems

Table 4

Comparison of three parameters between GS, AGE, and TAGE methods at .

		Methods	n
			512	1024	2048	4096	8192
Problem	Number of iterations	GS	683321	2438369	8574499	29583490	99478766
		AGE	96944	355232	1283001	4562489	15935054
		TAGE	77528	280061	877932	2885438	10414635
	Execution time	GS	49.22	210.33	1026.58	5771.53	32617.94
		AGE	8.00	39.00	203.00	1298.00	8186.00
		TAGE	7.00	31.00	141.00	835.00	5395.00
	Hausdorff distance	GS
		AGE
		TAGE
Problem	Number of iterations	GS	476633	1696912	5949186	20442908	68356295
		AGE	67778	247998	893940	3170624	11034378
		TAGE	53599	187647	673042	2127413	7524856
	Execution time	GS	35.42	155.72	757.27	4364.75	26127.43
		AGE	6.00	27.00	141.00	914.00	5706.00
		TAGE	4.00	20.00	107.00	612.00	3937.00
	Hausdorff distance	GS
		AGE
		TAGE