Research Article
Implementation of TAGE Method Using Seikkala Derivatives Applied to Two-Point Fuzzy Boundary Value Problems
Table 3
Comparison of three parameters between GS, AGE, and TAGE methods at
.
| | | Methods | n | | | 512 | 1024 | 2048 | 4096 | 8192 |
| Problem | Number of iterations | GS | 683007 | 2437112 | 8569470 | 29563373 | 99398298 | AGE | 96905 | 355076 | 1282378 | 4559989 | 15925021 | TAGE | 77499 | 279944 | 877567 | 2884304 | 10408307 | Execution time | GS | 49.25 | 210.43 | 988.93 | 5784.36 | 32665.34 | AGE | 9.00 | 39.00 | 203.00 | 1311.00 | 8152.00 | TAGE | 6.00 | 31.00 | 141.00 | 837.00 | 5397.00 | Hausdorff distance | GS | | | | | | AGE | | | | | | TAGE | | | | | |
| Problem | Number of iterations | GS | 476410 | 1696018 | 5945607 | 20428592 | 68299033 | AGE | 67751 | 247888 | 893496 | 3168843 | 11027246 | TAGE | 53578 | 187569 | 672733 | 2126364 | 7520993 | Execution time | GS | 35.40 | 155.80 | 757.38 | 4585.51 | 26078.03 | AGE | 6.00 | 27.00 | 141.00 | 912.00 | 5696.00 | TAGE | 5.00 | 21.00 | 107.00 | 620.00 | 3900.00 | Hausdorff distance | GS | | | | | | AGE | | | | | | TAGE | | | | | |
|
|