Implementation of TAGE Method Using Seikkala Derivatives Applied to Two-Point Fuzzy Boundary Value Problems

Table 1

Comparison of three parameters between GS, AGE, and TAGE methods at .

		Methods	n
			512	1024	2048	4096	8192
Problem	Number of iterations	GS	681711	2431928	8548735	29480437	99066551
		AGE	96747	354438	1279808	4549671	15883620
		TAGE	77377	279463	876061	2879619	10383345
	Execution time	GS	48.94	211.19	989.91	5719.20	32465.10
		AGE	8.00	39.00	202.00	1310.00	8125.00
		TAGE	7.00	31.00	141.00	822.00	5342.00
	Hausdorff distance	GS
		AGE
		TAGE
Problem	Number of iterations	GS	475487	1692329	5930853	20369573	68062962
		AGE	67638	247434	891667	3161503	10997813
		TAGE	53492	187245	671456	2122064	7505046
	Execution time	GS	35.27	155.77	764.09	4457.31	26063.40
		AGE	6.00	27.00	141.00	912.00	5676.00
		TAGE	5.00	20.00	107.00	608.00	3887.00
	Hausdorff distance	GS
		AGE
		TAGE