Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 738509 | 13 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/738509

# Geometric Integrability of Some Generalizations of the Camassa-Holm Equation

Accepted17 Jul 2011
Published04 Oct 2011

#### Abstract

We study the Camassa-Holm (CH) equation and recently introduced μCH equation from the geometric point of view. We show that Kupershmidt deformations of these equations describe pseudospherical surfaces and hence are geometrically integrable.

#### 1. Introduction

The modern theory of integrable nonlinear partial differential equations arose as a result of the inverse scattering method (ISM) discovered by Gardner et al.  for Korteweg de Vries (KdV) equation. Soon after, it was realized that this method can be applied to several important nonlinear equations like nonlinear Shrödinger equation, sine-Gordon, and so forth.

Sasaki  gave a natural geometric interpretation for ISM in terms of pseudospherical surfaces. Motivated by Sasaki, Chern and Tenenblat  introduce the notion of a scalar equation of pseudospherical type and study systematically the evolution equations that describe pseudospherical surfaces. It appears that almost all important equations and systems in mathematical physics enjoy this property . The advantage of this geometric treatment is that most of the ingredients connected with the integrable equations such as Lax pair, zero curvature representation, conservation laws, and symmetries come naturally.

Let us recall some facts about the equations we study in this paper.

The Camassa-Holm equation (CH) where , has appeared in  as an equation with bi-Hamiltonian structure. Later, in , it was considered as a model, describing the unidirectional propagation of shallow water waves over a flat bottom. CH is a completely integrable equation; see, for example, . Furthermore, CH is geometrically integrable . Here, we consider the case . Then, (1.1) is

The bi-Hamiltonian form of (1.2) is [8, 9] where are the two compatible Hamiltonian operators ( stands for ), and the corresponding Hamiltonians are

There exists an infinite sequence of conservation laws (multi-Hamiltonian structure) including (1.4) such that Very recently a “modified” CH equation (mCH) was introduced by analogy of “Miura transform” from the theory of KdV equation in .

The CH equation was derived recently in [13, 14] as where and is a spatially periodic real-valued function of time variable and space variable . In order to keep a certain symmetry and analogy with CH, one can write the above equation in the form (see also ) Note that in the periodic case. Introducing (1.7) becomes The CH is an integrable equation and arises as an asymptotic rotator equation in a liquid crystal with a preferred direction if one takes into account the reciprocal action of dipoles on themselves [13, 14].

The bi-Hamiltonian form of (1.8) is where are the two compatible Hamiltonian operators, and the corresponding Hamiltonians are Also the CH equation is geometrically integrable  (see there for other geometric descriptions of this equation).

Recently in , a new 6th-order wave equation, named KdV6, was derived. After some rescaling, this equation can be presented as the following system; This system gives a perturbation to KdV equation (), and since the constrain on is differential, this is a nonholonomic deformation.

Kupershmidt  suggested a general construction applicable to any bi-Hamiltonian systems providing a nonholonomic perturbation on it. This perturbation is conjectured to preserve integrability. In the case of KdV6, the system (1.11) can be converted into where are the two standard Hamiltonian operators of the KdV hierarchy and In the same paper, Kupershmidt verifies integrability of KdV6, as well as integrability of such nonholonomic deformations for some representative cases: the classical long-wave equation, the Toda lattice (both continuous and discrete), and the Euler top.

In fact, Kersten et al.  prove that the Kupershmidt deformation of every bi-Hamiltonian equation is again bi-Hamiltonian system and every hierarchy of conservation laws of the original bi-Hamiltonian system, gives rise to a hierarchy of conservation laws of the Kupershmidt deformation.

The aim of this paper is to show that the CH and the CH equations have geometrically integrable Kupershmidt deformations. We also show that the KdV6 equation and two-component CH system  are also geometrically integrable.

As a matter of fact, Yao and Zeng  propose a generalized Kupershmidt deformation and verify that this generalized deformation also preserves integrability in few representative cases: KdV equation, Boussinesq equation, Jaulent-Miodek equation, and CH equation.

Kundu et al.  consider slightly generalized form of deformation for the KdV equation and extend this approach to mKdV equation and to AKNS system.

Guha  uses Kirillov's theory of coadjoint representation of Virasoro algebra to obtain a large class of KdV6-type equations, equivalent to the original one. Also, applying the Adler-Konstant-Symes scheme, he constructs a new nonholonomic deformation of the coupled KdV equation.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some facts about equations that describe pseudospherical surfaces. The main results are in Section 3. There we show that the Kupershmidt deformations for the CH equation and for the CH equation are of pseudospherical type and hence are geometrically integrable. We also derive the corresponding quadratic pseudopotentials which turn out to be very useful in obtaining conservation laws and symmetries. At the end, we make some speculations about “modified” CH equation.

#### 2. Equations of Pseudospherical Type and Pseudopotentials

In this section, we recall some definitions and facts. One can consult, for example,  for more details.

Definition 2.1. A scalar differential equation in two independent variables is of pseudospherical type (or, it describes pseudospherical surfaces) if there exist one-forms whose coefficients are smooth functions which depend on and finite number of derivatives of , such that the 1-forms satisfy the structure equations whenever is a solution of .
Equations (2.2) can be interpreted as follows. The graphs of local solutions of equations of pseudospherical type can be equipped with structure of pseudospherical surface (see [3, 6, 7]): if , the tensor defines a Riemannian metric of constant Gaussian curvature −1 on the graph of solution , and is the corresponding metric connection one-form.
An equation of pseudospherical type is the integrability condition for a -valued problem where is the matrix-valued one-form

Definition 2.2. An equation is geometrically integrable if it describes a nontrivial one-parameter family of pseudospherical surfaces.

Hence, if is geometrically integrable, it is the integrability condition of one-parameter family of linear problems . In fact, this is equivalent to the zero curvature equation which is an essential ingredient of integrable equations.

Another important property of equations of pseudospherical type is that they admit quadratic pseudopotentials. Pseudopotentials are a generalization of conservation laws.

Proposition 2.3 (see ). Let be a differential equation describing pseudospherical surfaces with associated one-forms . The following two Pfaffian systems are completely integrable whenever is a solution of : Moreover, the one-forms are closed whenever is a solution of and (resp. ) is a solution of (2.6) (resp. (2.7)).

Geometrically, Pfaffian systems (2.6) and (2.7) determine geodesic coordinates on the pseudospherical surfaces associated with the equation [3, 6].

#### 3. Results

In this section, we consider the nonholonomic deformation of CH equation and CH equation. We show that they are geometrically integrable and consider their quadratic pseudopotentials. The nonlocal symmetries will be studied elsewhere.

##### 3.1. CH Equation

Recall from Introduction the CH equation (1.2) and its bi-Hamiltonian form (1.3) with the corresponding Hamiltonian operators and .

Following Kupershmidt's construction, we introduce the nonholonomic deformation of the CH equation

Proposition 3.1. The system (3.1) describes pseudospherical surface and hence is geometrically integrable.

Let us give the corresponding 1-forms

For the proof of Proposition 3.1, we need only to verify the structure equations (2.2) and to check that the parameter is intrinsic.

For the matrices and in, we get where Hence, we have a zero curvature representation for the system (3.1). From (3.3), it is straightforward to obtain the corresponding scalar linear problem

In order to apply Proposition 2.3 to nonholonomic deformation of the CH equation, we consider new 1-forms With these forms the Pfaffian system (2.7) becomes Applying the transform after some algebraic manipulations and setting , we obtain the following result.

Proposition 3.2. The nonholonomic deformation of the CH equation (3.1) admits a quadratic pseudopotential , defined by the equations where . Moreover, (3.1) possesses the parameter-dependent conservation law

Conservation densities can be obtained by expanding (3.9) and (3.11) in powers of . Note that the left hand side of (3.11) and (3.9) does not depend on as it should be. The corresponding expansions are performed in .

##### 3.2. 𝜇CH Equation

Consider now the CH equation (1.8), its bi-Hamiltonian form (1.9) with the corresponding Hamiltonian operators . Applying Kupershmidt's procedure to (1.8), we obtain the nonholonomic deformation of the CH equation or

Proposition 3.3. The nonholonomic deformation of the CH equation (3.13) describes pseudospherical surfaces and, hence, is geometrically integrable.

For validation of Proposition 3.3, we give the 1-forms associated with (3.13)

For the matrices and in, we get where Hence, we have a zero curvature representation for the system (3.13). From (3.3), it is straightforward to obtain the corresponding scalar linear problem which coincides with those in  upon setting and .

In order to find pseudopotentials for the nonholonomic deformation of the CH equation, we proceed as before denoting With these forms, the Pfaffian system (2.7) becomes After some manipulations, the above system obtains the form Applying the transform , we get Multiplying the first equation (3.22) by and then adding the result to the second equation (3.23), we get the following result denoting .

Proposition 3.4. The nonholonomic deformation of the CH equation (3.13) admits a quadratic pseudopotential , defined by the equations where . Moreover, (3.13) possesses the parameter-dependent conservation law

As the conserved densities for the nonholonomic deformation are the same as for the original bi-Hamiltonian system, we make use of the pseudopotentials to obtain them for the CH equation. One possible expansion of is Substituting this into (3.24) yields In this way, we can obtain local functionals; see .

We finish this section with the geometric integrability of one of the most popular two-component generalization of CH equation and of KdV6 equation.

Another generalization of the Camassa-Holm equation is the following integrable two-component CH system : where . Introducing a new variable , the above system becomes The system (3.30) is geometrically integrable. The corresponding 1-forms, satisfying the structure equations (2.2), are the following: We could easily include two-component Hunter-Saxon system  into this picture (see also ).

Finally, we note that nonholonomic perturbation of KdV equation, known as KdV6 equation, is also of pseudospherical type, that is, KdV6 equation is geometrically integrable. We just give the corresponding 1-forms which coincide with those for KdV equation  when .

#### 4. Concluding Remarks

In this paper, we study the CH equation and some of its generalizations from the geometric point of view. We show that Kupershmidt deformations for CH and CH equations preserve integrability and derive some important objects like quadratic pseudopotentials which turn out to be useful for obtaining conservation laws and nonlocal symmetries. It is also shown that the KdV6 equation and two-component CH system are also geometrically integrable.

Having at hand these examples of geometrically integrable Kupershmidt deformations, it is natural to think that maybe there exists a general link in this sense: a Kupershmidt deformation of geometrically integrable system is again geometrically integrable. We have not succeeded in establishing such a link up to now, but we believe that this is true at least for the systems with local Hamiltonian pair of operators as in the above examples.

Let us return, however, to the CH equation (). It is obvious that pseudopotentials for the CH equation (1.8) and parameter-dependent conservation law are obtained from Equation (4.1) is an analogue of the Miura transformation of KdV theory. We can repeat, purely formally, the procedure for obtaining the “modified” CH (mCH) equation  in this case. However, it is clear that since CH contains nonlocal term, one can expect that the “modified” equation also will have nonlocal terms.

Denote by the operator . The operators and commute and .

We have in which is determined by (4.1). Then, the second equation (4.2) takes the form or Formally, this equation can be named as a “modified” CH equation. One can simplify further this equation using (4.1) or even to present it as a system as in , it remains nonlocal and, hence, it is of no immediate advantage.

#### Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by Grant no. 169/2010 of Sofia University and by Grant no. DD VU 02/90 with NSF of Bulgaria.

1. C. Gardner, J. Green, M. Kruskal, and R. Miura, “Method for solving the Korteweg-de Vriez equation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1095–1097, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
2. R. Sasaki, “Soliton equations and pseudospherical surfaces,” Nuclear Physics. B, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 343–357, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
3. S. S. Chern and K. Tenenblat, “Pseudospherical surfaces and evolution equations,” Studies in Applied Mathematics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 55–83, 1986. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH
4. Q. Ding and K. Tenenblat, “On differential systems describing surfaces of constant curvature,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 185–214, 2002.
5. P. Górka and E. G. Reyes, “The modified Camassa-Holm equation,” IMRN, vol. 2011, no. 12, pp. 2617–2649, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
6. E. Reyes, “Geometric integrability of the Camassa-Holm equation,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 117–131, 2002.
7. E. Reyes, “Pseudo-potentials, nonlocal symmetries and integrability of some shallow water equations,” Selecta Mathematica. New Series, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 241–270, 2006.
8. A. S. Fokas and B. Fuchssteiner, “Symplectic structures, their Bäcklund transformations and hereditary symmetries,” Physica D. Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–66, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
9. R. Camassa and D. Holm, “An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1661–1664, 1993.
10. A. Constantin, “On the inverse spectral problem for the Camassa-Holm equation,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 352–363, 1998.
11. A. Constantin and H. McKean, “A shallow water equation on the circle,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 949–982, 1999.
12. A. Constantin and R. Ivanov, “Poisson structure and action-angle variables for the Camassa-Holm equation,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 93–108, 2006.
13. B. Khesin, J. Lenells, and G. Misiołek, “Generalized Hunter-Saxton equation and the geometry of the group of circle diffeomorphisms,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 342, no. 3, pp. 617–656, 2008.
14. J. Lenells, G. Misiołek, and F. Tiğlay, “Integrable evolution equations on spaces of tensor densities and their peakon solutions,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 129–161, 2010.
15. F. Ying, L. Yue, and O. Chougzheng, “On the blow-up structure for the generalized periodic Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations,” arXiv: 1009.2466v2. View at: Google Scholar
16. A. Karasu-Kalkanlı, A. Karasu, A. Sakovich, S. Sakovich, and R. Turhan, “A new integrable generalization of the Korteweg-de Vries equation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 49, no. 7, article 073516, 2008.
17. B. Kupershmidt, “KdV6: an integrable system,” Physics Letters. A, vol. 372, no. 15, pp. 2634–2639, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
18. P. Kersten, I. Krasil'shchik, A. Verbovetsky, and R. Vitolo, “Integrability of Kupershmidt deformations,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2010.
19. A. Constantin and R. Ivanov, “On an integrable two-component Camassa-Holm shallow water system,” Physics Letters. A, vol. 372, no. 48, pp. 7129–7132, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
20. Y. Yao and Y. Zeng, “The generalized Kupershmidt deformation for constructing new integrable systems from integrable bi-Hamiltonian systems,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 51, no. 6, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
21. A. Kundu, R. Sahadevan, and R. Nalinidevi, “Nonholonomic deformation of KdV and mKdV equations and their symmetries, hierarchies and integrability,” Journal of Physics. A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 42, no. 11, article 115213, 2009.
22. P. Guha, “Nonholonomic deformation of generalized KdV-type equations,” Journal of Physics. A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 42, no. 34, article 345201, 2009. Download other formatsMore  Order printed copiesOrder  Sign up for content alertsSign up

You are browsing a BETA version of Hindawi.com. Click here to switch back to the original design.