Comparing the Air Abrasion Cutting Efficacy of Dentine Using a Fluoride-Containing Bioactive Glass versus an Alumina Abrasive: An<i> In Vitro</i> Study

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Na0SR composition</td><td align="center">% by molecular weight</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center">37%</td></tr><tr><td align="left">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center">6.1%</td></tr><tr><td align="left">SrO</td><td align="center">53.9%</td></tr><tr><td align="left">SrF<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center">3%</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="2"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Composition of Na0SR by molecular weight percentage.

International Journal of Dentistry

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: Comparing the Air Abrasion Cutting Efficacy of Dentine Using a Fluoride-Containing Bioactive Glass versus an Alumina Abrasive: An<i> In Vitro</i> Study 

Table 1 | Comparing the Air Abrasion Cutting Efficacy of Dentine Using a Fluoride-Containing Bioactive Glass versus an Alumina Abrasive: An In Vitro Study 