Interdental Papilla Length and the Perception of Aesthetics in Asymmetric Situations

Table 1

Rating of altered papilla by different specialties.

	0 mm				1 mm				2 mm				3 mm
	Prs	Per	Gen	All	Prs	Per	Gen	All	Prs	Per	Gen	All	Prs	Per	Gen	All
I	20	20	25	65	2	2	9	13	0	1	3	4	0	0	1	1
II					18	17	16	51	11	12	16	39	3	6	12	21
III					0	1	0	1	9	7	6	22	14	11	8	33
IV					0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3	3	4	10
% of acceptance as attractive					100	95	100	98	55	65	76	66	15	30	52	33
% of acceptance as unattractive					0	5	0	1	45	35	24	33	85	70	48	66

Prs: prosthodontist, Per: periodontist, Gen: general dentist, I: very attractive, II: attractive, III: unattractive, and IV: very unattractive.