Review Article
Efficacy of CAD/CAM Glass Fiber Posts for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth
Table 5
Results of the 7 included studies according to the groups studied and their comparative efficacy.
| | Study | Intraradicular posts | Studied properties | | Reference | Studied groups | Fracture resistance | Bond strength | Nanoleakage | Cement layer thickness |
| | Pang et al. [17] | GFP
GFP CAD/CAM
CP | -
=
= | ----- | ----- | ----- | | Tsintsadze et al. [18] | GFP
GFP CAD/CAM
CP | ----- | -
+
++ | ++
+
- | +
=
= | | Eid et al. [19] | GFP
GFP CAD/CAM | =
= | ----- | ----- | ----- | | da Costa et al. [20] | GFP
GFP CAD/CAM | =
= | ----- | ----- | +
- | | Passos et al. [21] | GFP
GFP CAD/CAM | =
= | ----- | ----- | ----- | | Eid et al. [22] | GFP
GFP CAD/CAM | ----- | -
+ | ----- | ----- | | Eid et al. [23] | GFP
GFP CAD/CAM | ----- | -
+ | ----- | ----- |
|
|
GFP: glass fiber posts. CP: cast posts. +: greater efficacy. –: less efficacy. =: equal efficacy. -----: property not evaluated.
|
