Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored by Various Direct Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study

Table 4

Summary of other studies testing the mechanical resistance on premolars.

Author (reference)	UP	UF	MOD	CC	CO	AMG
Javaheri et al. [16]	1139		919			705
Atiyah and Baban [17]	1123	545	687		672 SI
Lia Mondelli et al. [6]	1514		605	1419		BX
Moosavi et al. [18]			803		754 BF	BX
Ragauska et al. [19]	1218		941		1407 IY	BX
Santos and Bezerra [20]	1138	490	1054
Shafiei et al. [21]	1101	228		699		772 AC
Kikuti et al. [22]	940	460	780		520 SI
Torabzadeh et al. [12]	1051		791	1148	800 OY
Xie et al. [13]	1131		904	1085
Yamada et al. [9]	825		700
Shivanna and Gopeshetti [10]	1098	171	440		524 FRC
Fahad and Majeed [23]	1182	556	879		855 BF
Panahandeh and Johar [14]			873	1499	750 1CC	BX
Sharma et al. [24]	1193	248	867			501
Sarabi et al. [25]	1196			962
Pradeep et al. [11]	1139	565	778			818
Joshi et al. [26]	1005	221	720		841 FRC	BX

Unprepared tooth (UP), unfilled cavity (UF), cusp coverage (CC), one cusp coverage (1CC), composite other (CO), bulk-fill (BF), Siloran (SI), inlay (IY), onlay (OY), box preparation (BX), fibre-reinforced composite (FRC), amalgam capping (AC).