International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

International Journal of Biomedical Imaging / 2006 / Article
Special Issue

Development of Computed Tomography Algorithms

View this Special Issue

Open Access

Volume 2006 |Article ID 80421 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/80421

Analysis of Cone-Beam Artifacts in off-Centered Circular CT for Four Reconstruction Methods

Received01 Dec 2005
Revised30 May 2006
Accepted31 May 2006
Published13 Aug 2006

Abstract

Cone-beam (CB) acquisition is increasingly used for truly three-dimensional X-ray computerized tomography (CT). However, tomographic reconstruction from data collected along a circular trajectory with the popular Feldkamp algorithm is known to produce the so-called CB artifacts. These artifacts result from the incompleteness of the source trajectory and the resulting missing data in the Radon space increasing with the distance to the plane containing the source orbit. In the context of the development of integrated PET/CT microscanners, we introduced a novel off-centered circular CT cone-beam geometry. We proposed a generalized Feldkamp formula (α-FDK) adapted to this geometry, but reconstructions suffer from increased CB artifacts. In this paper, we evaluate and compare four different reconstruction methods for correcting CB artifacts in off-centered geometry. We consider the α-FDK algorithm, the shift-variant FBP method derived from the T-FDK, an FBP method based on the Grangeat formula, and an iterative algebraic method (SART). The results show that the low contrast artifacts can be efficiently corrected by the shift-variant method and the SART method to achieve good quality images at the expense of increased computation time, but the geometrical deformations are still not compensated for by these techniques.

References

  1. G. T. Herman, Image Reconstruction from Projections, chapter 14, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  2. F. Natterer, “The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography,” John Wiley & sons, Chichester, NY, USA, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. Gordon, R. Bender, and G. T. Herman, “Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 471–481, 1970. View at: Google Scholar
  5. P. Gilbert, “Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 105–117, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. H. Andersen and A. C. Kak, “Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): a superior implementation of the art algorithm,” Ultrasonic Imaging, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  7. G. T. Herman, A. V. A. Lakshminarayanan, and A. Naparstek, “Convolution reconstruction techniques for divergent beams,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 259–271, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G. T. Gullberg, “The reconstruction of Fan Beam Data by filtering the back-projection,” Computer Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 30–47, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  9. C. Hamaker, K. T. Smith, D. C. Solmon, and S. L. Wagner, “The divergent beam X-ray transform,” Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10, pp. 253–283, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  10. F. Peyrin, “The generalized back-projection theorem for cone-beam projection data,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 32, pp. 1512–1219, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  11. B. D. Smith, “Cone-beam tomography. Recent advances and a tutorial review,” Optical Engineering, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 524–534, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  12. G. L. Zeng and G. T. Gullberg, “A cone-beam tomography algorithm for orthogonal circle-and-line orbit,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 563–577, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  13. H. Kudo and T. Saito, “Fast and stable cone-beam filtered backprojection method for non-planar orbits,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 747–760, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  14. G. Wang, T.-H. Lin, P. Cheng, and D. M. Shinozaki, “A general cone-beam reconstruction algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 486–496, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Katsevich, “Theoretically exact filtered backprojection-type inversion algorithm for spiral CT,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 2012–2026, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  16. H. Kudo, T. Rodet, F. Noo, and M. Defrise, “Exact and approximate algorithms for helical cone-beam CT,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 49, no. 13, pp. 2913–2931, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. A. Kirillov, “On a problem of IM Gel'fand,” Soviet Mathematics Doklady, vol. 2, pp. 268–269, 1961, English Translation. View at: Google Scholar
  18. H. K. Tuy, “An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematic, vol. 43, no. 3-4, pp. 546–552, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  19. B. D. Smith, “Cone-beam convolution formula,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 81–87, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, and J. W. Kress, “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 612–619, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. Grass, Th. Köhler, and R. Proksa, “3D cone-beam CT reconstruction for circular trajectories,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 329–347, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. Yu, X. Pan, and C. A. Pelizzari, “Image reconstruction with a shift-variant filtration in circular cone-beam CT,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 213–221, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  23. P. Grangeat, “Mathematical framework of cone-beam 3D reconstruction via the first derivative of the Radon transform,” in Mathematical Methods in Tomography, G. T. Herman, A. K. Louis, and F. Natterer, Eds., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 66–97, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. W. Lee, G. Cho, and G. Wang, “Artifacts associated with implementation of the Grangeat formula,” Medical Physics, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2871–2880, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  25. H. Hu, “An improved cone-beam reconstruction algorithm for the circular orbit,” Scanning, vol. 18, pp. 572–581, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  26. H. Yang, M. Li, K. Koizumi, and H. Kudo, “A FBP-type cone-beam reconstruction algorithm with Radon space interpolation ability for axially truncated data from a circular orbit,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fully 3D Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, pp. 401–404, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, July 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. Hsieh, “A practical cone-beam artifact correction algorithm,” in Poceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Rcord (NSS '00), vol. 2, pp. 15/71–15/74, Lyon, France, October 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  28. K. Zeng, Z. Chen, L. Zhang, and G. Wang, “A half-scan error reduction based algorithm for cone-beam CT,” Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 73–82, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  29. K. Zeng, Z. Chen, L. Zhang, and G. Wang, “An error-reduction-based algorithm for cone-beam computed tomography,” Medical Physics, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 3206–3212, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. Valton, F. Peyrin, and D. Sappey-Marinier, “Generalization of 3D tomographic reconstruction algorithm FDK for an off-centred geometry,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '05), vol. 3, pp. 620–623, Genova, Italy, September 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  31. P. Delpierre, S. Basolo, and J. F. Berar et al., “Pixscan: pixel detector CT-scanner for small animal imaging,” in Poceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Rcord (NSS '05), vol. 4, pp. 2381–2385, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA, October 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  32. C. Axelsson, Direct Fourier methods in 3D-reconstruction from cone-beam data, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1994, p. 123. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2006 S. Valton et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

0 Views | 0 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up

You are browsing a BETA version of Hindawi.com. Click here to switch back to the original design.