Adaptive Countering Technique for Angle Deception Based on Dual Polarization Radar Seeker

Table 1

Comparison of the proposed technique with the conventional monopulse method.

		Target only	Target with corner reflector	Target with active jamming	Target with combined jamming
Conventional monopulse method	mean	−0.502°	0.967°	1.115°	1.297°
	standard deviation	0.066°	0.095°	0.098°	0.135°
The proposed technique	mean	/	−0.412°	−0.485°	−0.458°
	standard deviation	/	0.094°	0.068°	0.090°