Correlation between Preoperative Platelet Count/(Lymphocyte Count × Prealbumin Count) Ratio and the Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Radical Operation

Liu, Yi; Yang, Yanguang; Tai, Guomei; Ni, Feng; Yu, Cenming; Zhao, Wenjing; Wang, Ding

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8401579

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 8401579 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8401579

Correlation between Preoperative Platelet Count/(Lymphocyte Count × Prealbumin Count) Ratio and the Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Radical Operation

Yi Liu,¹Yanguang Yang,¹Guomei Tai,¹Feng Ni,¹Cenming Yu,¹Wenjing Zhao,²and Ding Wang³

Academic Editor: Amosy M'Koma

Received19 Dec 2022

Revised31 May 2023

Accepted02 Jul 2023

Published28 Jul 2023

Abstract

Objective. To clarify the relationship between preoperative platelet count/(lymphocyte count × prealbumin count) ratio (PLPR) and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer undergoing a radical operation, combined with Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging, a scoring system was established to guide clinical application. Methods. The clinical data of 238 patients receiving radical operations for gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed. According to the area under the Receiver operating characteristic curve, the predictive value of the preoperative PLPR for the 5-year overall survival (OS) of gastric cancer was determined, and the best cut-off value of the ratio was corresponding to the maximum value of Yoden index. Chi-squared test was applied to analyze the correlation between the ratio and clinicopathological features. Kaplan–Meier curve was applied to analyze the influence of this ratio on 5-year OS. The Cox regression model was applied to analyze the hazards affecting the long-term survival of patients. The nomogram model was used to predict the long-term survival rate. Results. The optimal cut-off point of preoperative PLPR ratio was 7.46, and the patients were segmented into two sets: one set of ratio <7.46 and another set of ratio ≥7.46. The ratio was correlated with the size of the tumor, T stage, N stage, total stage, vascular cancer thrombus, and nerve invasion. In stage I–III patients, the prognosis was better in the low-ratio set than in the high-ratio set (), subgroup analysis indicated the prognosis was obviously better in the low-ratio set than in the high-ratio set in stage II and III patients ( and ), but there was no difference in stage I patients (). Age, T stage, N stage, total TNM stage, tumor size, vascular tumor thrombus, nerve invasion, preoperative neutrophil count/lymphocyte count (NLR; reference value 3.68), preoperative PLPR (reference value 7.46), preoperative platelet count/lymphocyte count (PLR; reference value 159.56), and preoperative platelet count × NLR (SII; reference value 915.48) were related to patient prognosis (); meanwhile age, total TNM stage, preoperative PLPR (reference value 7.46), preoperative PLR (reference value 159.56), and preoperative SII (reference value 915.48) were independent hazards for prognosis (). Five independent risk factors were analyzed by nomogram model to predict the 5-year OS of patients who underwent a radical operation for carcinoma of the stomach. Conclusion. Preoperative PLPR ratio (reference value 7.46) is an independent risk factor for long-term prognosis in patients undergoing a radical operation for gastric cancer. The nomogram scoring system established by postoperative TNM staging combined with this ratio and age, PLR, and SII can better forecast the survival of patients who underwent radical operation for carcinoma of the stomach.

1. Introduction

The morbidity and mortality of gastric cancer locate fifth and fourth among malignant tumors, respectively [1]. Although there are many clinical treatment methods, the five-year overall survival (OS) rate of advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing radical surgery is still low. If we can find indicators to predict the long-term prognosis for clinical guidance, it will be of great significance. In 1863, the German pathologist Virchow found leukocytes in the tumor tissue and proposed that inflammation and the presence of the tumor were closely related [2]. In recent decades, tumor-related inflammation has been regarded as a key factor in cancer development, mediating tumor occurrence, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis through the release of a variety of inflammatory factors [3]. Changing neutrophil counts in the peripheral blood reflect the inflammatory state of the organism. The surveillance and clearance of tumors by the immune system mainly depend on the role of lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. If the number of lymphocytes is reduced, the immune response of tumors will be suppressed [4]. Platelets can surround tumor cells to protect them from natural killer (NK) cell killing and also can promote tumor growth, invasion, and angiogenesis [5]. Malnutrition is prevalent in cancer patients. It can destroy the body’s immune system and inhibit immune function. Prealbumin can be used as one of the indicators to judge nutritional status. Currently, individual indicators, such as inflammation, immunity, coagulation, and nutrition are associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer. In some gastric cancer studies, the prognosis of groups with high neutrophil count/lymphocyte count (NLR), high platelet count/lymphocyte count (PLR), and high SII (platelet count × NLR) is poor [6–8]. Some studies have found that low serum prealbumin level is associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients [9]. The relationship between preoperative platelet count/(lymphocyte count × prealbumin count) ratio (PLPR) as a combined predictor of immunity, coagulation, nutrition, and long-term survival in patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery has not been studied. Therefore, this study is worth exploring.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Retrospective Analysis

Retrospective analysis was performed on stage I–III patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric cancer in the department of gastrointestinal surgery, affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University from January 2014 to June 2016. Inclusion criteria: (1) gastric cancer was confirmed by pathology; (2) patients undergoing radical gastrectomy; (3) clinical data and follow-up data were intact. Exclusion criteria: (1) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery; (2) patients with distant metastasis before surgery; (3) patients with a serious infection, blood disease, other malignant tumors, and autoimmune diseases before surgery; (4) patients with hepatitis, cirrhosis, and other serious liver diseases before operation. Finally, a total of 238 patients with gastric cancer were included.

2.2. Method

In this study, we performed Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging in patients with gastric cancer in line with the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International for Cancer Control. Neutrophil counts, platelet counts, lymphocyte counts, and prealbumin levels were measured within three days before surgery. Evaluation criteria include NLR, PLR, SII, and PLPR were set. According to the optimal threshold of PLPR, the distribution and correlation of various clinical indicators were analyzed, and the influence of this ratio on the 5-year OS rate was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier (K–M) curve. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the risk factors affecting the long-term survival of patients. A nomogram model was used to predict long-term survival.

2.2.1. Follow-Up Methods

Enrolled patients were followed up every 3 months for the first 2 years after surgery and every 6 months thereafter until June 2021. In total, six patients were lost to follow-up. OS: the time from the date of surgery to the date of death or the date of the last follow-up.

2.3. Method of Statistics

SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical processing. Yoden index, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Chi-squared test, K–M survival curve, and Cox regression model were used for the study. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. ROC Curve of Preoperative Peripheral Blood Parameters NLR, PLR, SII, PLPR (Associated with 5-year Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Radical Gastric Cancer Surgery)

The preoperative peripheral blood parameters NLR, PLR, SII, and PLPR were considered for the test variables, and the 5-year OS rate was considered for the status variable. The optimum cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity were determined by the maximum Youden index. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PLPR was 0.711, and the optimal cut-off value corresponding to the maximum value of the Youden index was 7.46. We found that the AUC value of PLPR was significantly higher than that of the other three indexes, indicating that PLPR had better predictive efficacy than the other three indexes (see Table 1 and Figure 1 for details).

3.2. Clinicopathological Features of the Patients Were Included

A total of 238 patients with gastric cancer were covered in this research with an average age of 63.99 years. These included 171 males (71.85%) and 67 females (28.15%; see Table 2 for details).

3.3. Relationship between Preoperative PLPR and Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Patients Who Underwent Radical Operation for Carcinoma of the Stomach

The group in ratio ≥7.46 compared with the group in ratio <7.46. There was no remarkable discrepancy in gender, age, surgical method, tumor location, degree of differentiation, and pathological type (). There were prominent differences in tumor size, T stage, N stage, overall stage, vascular tumor thrombus, and nerve invasion (; see details in Table 3).

3.4. The Relationship between Preoperative PLPR and the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients Was Evaluated by K–M Survival Curve

In patients with stage I–III, the prognosis of the <7.46 group was significantly better than that of the prognosis of ≥7.46 group (), as shown in Figure 2. In patients with stage I, the prognosis of the <7.46 group compared with the ≥7.46 group was undifferentiated (), as shown in Figure 3. In patients with stage II, the prognosis of the <7.46 group was better than the prognosis of ≥7.46 group (), as shown in Figure 4. In patients with stage III, the prognosis of the <7.46 group was significantly better than the prognosis of ≥7.46 group (), as shown in Figure 5.

3.5. Cox Regression Model Was Applied to Analyze the Hazards Affecting the 5-year Overall Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer after Radical Operation

Univariate analysis indicated that age, T stage, N stage, TNM total stage, tumor size, vascular tumor thrombus, nerve invasion, preoperative NLR (reference value: 3.68), preoperative PLPR (reference value: 7.46), preoperative PLR (reference value: 159.56), and preoperative SII (reference value: 915.48) were associated with the 5-year OS of patients (). Multivariate analysis indicated that age, TNM total stage, preoperative PLPR (reference value: 7.46), preoperative PLR (reference value: 159.56), and preoperative SII (reference value: 915.48) were independent hazards for the 5-year OS of patients (; see details in Table 4).

3.6. Nomogram Analysis

Based on the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis, a nomogram including age, total TNM stage, preoperative PLPR (reference value: 7.46), and preoperative PLR (reference value: 159.56), and preoperative SII (reference value: 915.48) were constructed. The total score of these five independent risk factors was calculated, according to the total score, we can estimate the 5-year survival rate of patients who underwent a radical operation for carcinoma of the stomach (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Gastric cancer patients are not easy to be found in the early stage, often diagnosed as locally advanced, and the long-term survival rate is low. TNM staging system, which is mainly based on postoperative pathological results, is the most commonly used indicator to forecast the prognosis of patients who had gastric carcinoma in clinical practice [10]. However, we still encounter patients whose prognosis is different from the prediction based on pathological TNM staging, emphasizing the need to combine more indicators to better predict the prognosis, which is of great significance for clinical practice to develop personalized treatment plans. There is increasing evidence that there are specific links between coagulation, immunity, nutrition, and cancer. Preoperative biomarkers in peripheral blood reflect the baseline status of patients to a certain extent and are highly accessible in clinical practice, which is taken for latent markers for forecasting prognosis [11–13]. We collected preoperative peripheral blood indexes of patients with radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, including platelet count, lymphocyte count, and prealbumin count, and integrated these indexes to explore their relationship with the long-term prognosis of gastric cancer.

Tumor cells are removed from the primary tumor tissue and enter the bloodstream. Platelets promote the enhancement of tumor-associated coagulation, covering tumor cells by aggregating platelets and protecting them from immune attack. At the same time, platelets secrete growth factors and chemokines, inhibit the immune environment, promote tumor neovascularization, and lead to tumor proliferation and metastasis [14].

Lymphocytes are the key components of anti-tumor immunity, among which T lymphocytes are specific immune cells and play a specific anti-tumor role. B lymphocytes are effector cells of humoral immunity, which can stimulate antitumor immunity through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [15, 16]. In the process of tumor development, lymphocytes in peripheral blood can migrate to the tumor microenvironment to form TILS, which plays an important role in anti-tumor immunity. Lymphopenia leads to a reduced immune response to malignant tumors and ultimately to a poorly controlled inhibitory effect on tumor proliferation [17, 18].

Inflammation promotes carcinogenesis by destroying tissues, and neutrophils play an important role in this process. Neutrophils are divided into N1 type and N2 type under the action of transforming growth factor. N1 type neutrophils increase cytotoxicity by stimulating the adaptive immune system, whereas N2 type neutrophils mainly inhibit immune responses by releasing extracellular traps, and promote tumor proliferation, metastasis, and invasion by producing cytokines and proteases [19]. In addition, a variety of enzymes and cytokines secreted by neutrophils also promote tumor development.

Malnutrition is common in patients with gastrointestinal malignant tumors, which can damage the human immune system, inhibit immune function, and lead to tumor progression. Prealbumin is synthesized by the liver and has the properties of a thymic hormone, which enhances the body’s immune response by promoting the maturation of lymphocytes [20, 21]. Compared with albumin, prealbumin is more susceptible to nutritional status and its detection is more accurate. Currently, several studies have shown that decreased prealbumin is detrimental to the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors [22, 23].

In this study, we analyzed the predictive value of preoperative peripheral blood parameters NLR, PLR, SII, and PLPR for 5-year OS in patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical surgery by the area under the ROC curve, and found that the predictive value of PLPR was significantly better than the other three indicators. According to the preoperative PLPR reference value of 7.46, patients were divided into PLPR high ratio group (≥7.46) and PLPR low ratio group (<7.46). Through K–M survival curve analysis, the prognosis of patients with stage I–III gastric cancer in the low ratio group was better than that in the high ratio group. Subgroup analyses showed similar results in patients with stage II and III gastric cancer. By Cox survival analysis, we found that age, T stage, N stage, total TNM stage, tumor size, vascular tumor thrombus, nerve invasion, preoperative NLR (reference value 3.68), preoperative PLPR (reference value 7.46), preoperative PLR (reference value 159.56), and preoperative SII (reference value 915.48) were related to the 5-year OS of patients with gastric cancer after radical surgery. Age, TNM total stage, preoperative PLPR, preoperative PLR, and preoperative SII are independent risk factors for the 5-year OS of patients with gastric cancer after radical surgery. Therefore, preoperative PLPR (reference value 7.46) has good predictive power for the long-term prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after radical surgery. Compared with the patients in the low ratio group, the patients in the high ratio group had larger tumor volume, later stage, and were more likely to have vascular tumor thrombus and nerve invasion. We integrated five variables: age, total TNM stage, preoperative PLPR (reference value: 7.46), preoperative PLR (reference value: 159.56), and preoperative SII (reference value: 915.48) to construct a nomogram and establish a prognostic scoring system. Based on the TNM staging system, we further improved the prognostic scoring system, to better guide clinical practice.

This study is the first to comprehensively consider the relationship between tumor stage, pathological characteristics, coagulation, immune, nutritional status, and long-term prognosis of patients who underwent a radical operation for carcinoma of the stomach and establish a scoring system, which can guide clinical practice. However, it has certain limitations. First, it is a single-center retrospective study, the number of cases is small and there is selection bias. Second, some indicators that may be related to the research are not included, for instance, Helicobacter pylori and Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The main reason is that these indicators are not routinely detected before surgery, resulting in the absence of some indicators. The effect of these factors needs to be further studied. Finally, we used OS as an assessment of prognosis and did not proceed with further investigation of progression-free survival(, which could also be explored in more depth.

5. Conclusions

The nomogram scoring system established by preoperative PLPR (reference value 7.46) combined with postoperative TNM stage, age, PLR, and SII can better forecast the prognosis of patients who underwent a radical operation for carcinoma of the stomach and guide clinical practice.

Data Availability

Data supporting this research article are available from the corresponding author or first author upon reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Nantong Tumor Hospital. The study/research was performed by the Declaration of Helsinki, and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The author(s) declare(s) that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

YL, DW, and YY wrote the paper. YL, GT, and WZ conceived the experiments. FN, DW, and CY analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. YL and YY are co-first authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the patients and their families and all the investigators. This study was supported by the doctoral research start-up fund of Nantong Tumor Hospital (BS202113).

References

H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Balkwill and A. Mantovani, “Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?” Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9255, pp. 539–545, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Colotta, P. Allavena, A. Sica, C. Garlanda, and A. Mantovani, “Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1073–1081, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Whiteside, “Immune modulation of T-cell and NK (natural killer) cell activities by TEXs (tumour-derived exosomes),” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 245–251, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jain, J. Harris, and J. Ware, “Platelets: linking hemostasis and cancer,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2362–2367, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, J. J. Lu, Y. P. Du, C. X. Feng, L. Q. Wang, and M. B. Chen, “Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 97, no. 12, p. e0144, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Szor, A. Roncon Dias, M. A. Pereira et al., “Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in patients who underwent potentially curative resection for gastric cancer,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 851–857, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang and D. Zhu, “The prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients after radical operation for carcinoma of stomach in gastric cancer,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 965–978, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, N. Hiki, S. Mine et al., “Role of prealbumin as a powerful and simple index for predicting postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 510–517, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ji, Z. D. Bu, Y. Yan et al., “The 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system for gastric cancer is superior to the 7th edition: results from a Chinese mono-institutional study of 1663 patients,” Gastric Cancer, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 643–652, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Jomrich, M. Paireder, I. Kristo et al., “High systemic immune-inflammation index is an adverse prognostic factor for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 273, no. 3, pp. 532–541, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Diem, S. Schmid, M. Krapf et al., “Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab,” Lung Cancer, vol. 111, pp. 176–181, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hirahara, Y. Tajima, Y. Fujii et al., “A novel prognostic scoring system using inflammatory response biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 172–184, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Bambace and C. E. Holmes, “The platelet contribution to cancer progression,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 237–249, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Quigley and V. Kristensen, “Predicting prognosis and therapeutic response from interactions between lymphocytes and tumor cells,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2054–2062, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. K. Hoffmann, G. Dworacki, T. Tsukihiro et al., “Spontaneous apoptosis of circulating T lymphocytes in patients with head and neck cancer and its clinical importance,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2553–2562, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Ray-Coquard, C. Cropet, M. Van Glabbeke et al., “Lymphopenia as a prognostic factor for overall survival in advanced carcinomas, sarcomas, and lymphomas,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 13, pp. 5383–5391, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Chua, K. A. Charles, V. E. Baracos, and S. J. Clarke, “Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 1288–1295, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Coffelt, M. D. Wellenstein, and K. E. de Visser, “Neutrophils in cancer: neutral no more,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 431–446, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Lee, E. S. Oh, R. W. Lee, and T. E. Finucane, “Serum albumin and prealbumin in calorically restricted, nondiseased individuals: a systematic review,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 128, no. 9, pp. 1023.e1–1023.e22, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Gao, M. Kong, J. Yao et al., “Changes in prealbumin and body mass index associated with T lymphocyte subsets and nutritional status in chronic hepatitis B and HBV-cirrhosis patients,” Clinical Laboratory, vol. 64, no. 11+12/2018, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Unal, O. Orhan, C. Eroglu, and B. Kaplan, “Prealbumin is a more sensitive marker than albumin to assess the nutritional status in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer,” Contemporary Oncology, vol. 3, pp. 276–280, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. X. Han, Z. M. Chen, Z. J. Wei, and A. M. Xu, “Preoperative pre-albumin predicts prognosis of patients after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 279, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Yi Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

196

Downloads

267

Citations