Clinical Study
Impact of Resected Gastric Volume on Postoperative Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Table 3
Correlation between RGV, EWL%, and BMI at 1 year after surgery.
| | | EWL% 1 aa | Sex | Volume resected (mL) | BMI 1 aa |
| EWL% (1 year) | Pearson correlation | 1 | 0.149 | 0.167 | -0.872() | Sig. (2-tailed) | | 0.217 | 0.168 | 0.000 | | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
| Sex | Pearson correlation | 0.149 | 1 | 0.075 | 0.070 | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.217 | | 0.536 | 0.563 | | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
| Resected gastric volume (mL) | Pearson correlation | 0.167 | 0.075 | 1 | -0.172 | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.16S | 0.536 | | 0.156 | | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
| BMI (1 year) | Pearson correlation | -0.872() | 0.070 | -0.172 | 1 | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.563 | 0.156 | | | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
|
|
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). |