Review Article

Current Role of Minimally Invasive Radical Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Cancer

Table 4

MiRC for GbC: intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and pathologic findings.

Author, year of publicationMean blood loss, mL (range)Mean operation duration, min (range)MorbidityMortalityMean LOS, days (range)Mean f-up duration, monthsDFS at last f-up, rateRecurrence locationT0-T1a/T1b/T2/T3Mean number of resected nodes, (range)NX/N0/N+

Cho et al., 2008 [16]Minor102
(89–146)
005
(4–7)
15100%1/0/2/04
(4-5)
0/3/0
de Aretxabala et al., 2010 [17]NSNS003
NS
2280%Peritoneum (case 1)3/13/5/26
(3–12)
8/14/1
Gumbs and Hoffman, 2010 [18]117
(50–200)
227
(120–360)
004
(3–5)
NSNSNS0/1/0/03
(1–6)
0/1/0
Gumbs and Hoffman, 2010 [19]137
(50–300)
204
(95–360)
004
(3-4)
NSNSNS0/0/0/13
(1–6)
0/0/1
Belli et al., 2011 [25]8516200533100%NoNANANA
Shen et al., 2012 [20]210
(50–400)
200
(120–360)
0071180%NS0/0/2/39
(3–11)
0/2/3
Gumbs et al., 2013 [21]160
(0–400)
220
(120–480)
004
(2–8)
2387%Hep pedicle (case 1)
Liver (case 2)
0/8/4/34
(1–11)
0/12/3
Machado et al., 2015 [15]24030000412100%0/1/0/090/1/0
Yoon et al., 2015 [22]100
(10–1500)
205
(90–360)
6/3204
(2–13)
6095%Liver (case 1)
Lung (case 2)
Liver + lung (case 3)
Colon (case 4)
0/7/25/07
(1–15)
0/27/5
Shirobe and Maruyama, 2015 [23]92
(10–643)
196
(150–490)
1/1106
(4–19)
8482%Hep pedicle + pleural (case 1)
Hep pedicle (case 2)
0/3/8/013
(9–18)
0/11/0
Agarwal et al., 2015 [26]200
(100–850)
270
(180–340)
3/2405
(3–16)
1896%Hep pedicle (case 1)4/1/11/810
(4–31)
0/19/5
Itano et al., 2015 [27]152
(±90)
368
(±73)
1/1609
(±1.6)
37100%1/2/13/013
(±3.1)
0/16/0
Palanisamy et al., 2016 [24]196
(±73)
212
(±26)
4/1405
(±0.9)
5175%NS0/0/11/18
(4–14)
0/9/3

MiRC: minimally invasive radical cholecystectomy, GbC: gallbladder cancer, f-up: follow-up, DFS: disease-free survival, NS: not specified, and LOS: length of hospital stay.
Pathologic findings available for only one patient.
Multicenter retrospective study.
Data regarding 23 patients affected by GbC initially included in the study (including 5 patients who underwent only laparoscopic exploration, without attempt for MiRC).
The absence of postoperative bile leak, abdominal collection, and need for reoperation.
Blood loss, operation duration, LOS, and resected nodes # are expressed in median (range).
Blood loss, operation duration, LOS, and resected nodes # are expressed in mean (±standard deviation). Only 12 patients affected by GbC were included in pathological and survival analysis.