Effects of Process-Genre Approach on Students’ Writing Strategy Use in Paragraphs: Second-Year Wachemo University Students

Table 5

Paired sample t-test results of the CG in the before- and after-conventional treatment in the use of writing strategies.

Variables	Measurements	N	Mean	S.D	t-Value	DF	Sig	Effect size	Relative size	In (%)
Cognitive writing strategies	BT	56	2.59	1.141	−8.254	55	0.001	0.416	Medium	69
	AT	56	3.61	1.089
Meta-cognitive writing strategies	BT	56	2.55	0.965	−7.977	55	0.001	0.38	Medium	69
	AT	56	3.34	0.981
Compensation writing strategies	BT	56	2.66	1.186	−5.933	55	0.001	0.36	Medium	69
	AT	56	3.56	1.178
Social writing strategies	BT	56	2.98	1.071	−19.570	55	0.001	0.34	Medium	69
	AT	56	3.71	0.941
Affective writing strategies	BT	56	2.56	1.253	−4.906	55	0.001	0.33	Medium	69
	AT	56	3.43	1.228