Research Article
Effects of Process-Genre Approach on Students’ Writing Strategy Use in Paragraphs: Second-Year Wachemo University Students
Table 3
Descriptive statistics of the overall mean of students’ use of writing strategies after the intervention.
| | Category | Group | N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. deviation |
| | Cognitive writing strategies | EG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.18 | 0.688 | | CG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.61 | 1.089 |
| | Metacognitive writing strategies | EG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.22 | 0.689 | | CG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.34 | 0.981 |
| | Compensation writing strategies | EG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.24 | 0.665 | | CG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.56 | 1.178 |
| | Social writing strategies | EG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.45 | 0.563 | | CG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.71 | 0.941 |
| | Affective writing strategies | EG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.16 | 0.689 | | CG | 56 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.43 | 1.228 |
|
|
