TLC-Based Metabolite Profiling and Bioactivity-Based Scientific Validation for Use of Water Extracts in AYUSH Formulations
Table 1
Percentage yield of different extracts of plant materials.
S. no.
Plant sample
Percentage yield (mean ± SD)
WE
EE
HEE
1
Phyllanthus emblica
51.42 ± 2.51
44.81 ± 3.45ns
41.51 ± 2.54
2
Piper nigrum
9.60 ± 1.08
8.21 ± 1.24ns
10.83 ± 1.56ns
3
Withania somnifera
16.44 ± 1.28
11.22 ± 0.47
13.62 ± 1.25
4
Tinospora cordifolia
12.61 ± 1.09
4.54 ± 0.48
7.42 ± 0.08
5
Curcuma longa
13.84 ± 1.04
9.84 ± 1.11
11.04 ± 2.12ns
6
Ocimum sanctum
8.44 ± 0.87
11.81 ± 0.65
15.63 ± 1.07
7
Azadirachta indica
20.22 ± 1.54
8.12 ± 0.07
14.04 ± 0.12
8
Achillea millefolium
10.41 ± 0.89
7.23 ± 0.21
12.51 ± 0.47
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Compared to WE (water extract): ,,; ns . WE = water extract; EE = ethanolic extract; HEE = hydroethanolic extract.