Research Article
Mindfulness Trait Predicts Neurophysiological Reactivity Associated with Negativity Bias: An ERP Study
Table 5
Results for multiple regression analysis of ERP Data (only those with significant correlations with age/CAMS-R are shown).
| | | | | | |
| | Frontal P2 (Pos-Neu) | | Model 1 | 27.01% | 7.403 | | | | Age | | | .520 | | | CAMR-S | | | — | — | | Model 2 | 35.91% | 5.323 | | | | Age | | | .488 | | | CAMR-S | | | .300 | .121 | | Model 3 | 35.95% | 3.367 | | | | Age | | | .488 | | | CAMR-S | | | .296 | .143 | | CAS-PA | | | .020 | .918 | | CAS-NA | | | — | — |
| | Frontocentral P2 (Pos-Neg) | | Model 1 | 27.87% | 7.726 | | | | Age | | | — | — | | CAMR-S | | | .528 | | | Model 2 | 28.23% | 3.736 | | | | Age | | | −.060 | .761 | | CAMR-S | | | .534 | | | Model 3 | 39.04% | 2.722 | | .064 | | Age | | | −.024 | .903 | | CAMR-S | | | .726 | | | CAS-PA | | | −.054 | .783 | | CAS-NA | | | .380 | .101 |
| | Frontocentral LPP (Neg-Neu) | | Model 1 | 28.75% | 8.069 | | | | Age | | | .536 | | | CAMR-S | | | — | — | | Model 2 | 29.03% | 3.886 | | | | Age | | | .536 | | | CAMR-S | | | .054 | .786 | | Model 3 | 29.32% | 2.478 | | .094 | | Age | | | .525 | | | CAMR-S | | | .029 | .900 | | CAS-NA | | | −.051 | .825 |
|
|
Note. Pos = positive; Neg = negative; Neu = neutral; Pos-Neu = positive-negative; Neg-Neu = negative-neutral; Pos-Neg = positive-negative; CAMS-R = Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale Revised; CAS = Chinese Affect Scale; PA = Positive Affect; NA = Negative affect.
and (uncorrected); rows highlighted denote the final selected models.
|
