No. Author/year Formula Drug application Study design Ulcer classification Control group Random/blinding Effect/control, case number 4.1
Xu and Han2006 [28 ] Evodiae fr. Acupoint application Case study No No No/No 92% improved/no control
4.2 Loo et al. 2010 [31 ] Rhodiola algida Oral administration Randomized group comparison WHO scale Basic treatment Yes *5/No Improved (ulcer size and number)
4.3 Shi and Shan 2009 [34 ] Catechu Topical application Randomized group comparison Clinical judgement Topic norfloxacin powder Yes *5/No 100%/73.3% improved
4.4 Wang et al. 2010 [37 ] Periplaneta americana Gargle solution Randomized group comparison WHO scale Saline gargle Yes *5/No 64%/16% improved
5.1a Ma and Song 2005 [44 ] Lonicerae fl. Glycyrrhiza r. Oral administr. + gargle solution Randomized group comparison WHO scale Boxax gargle Yes *5/No 80.6%/14.8% improved
5.1b Zeng 2005 [45 ] Lonicerae fl, Glycyrrhiza r. Gargle solution Randomized group comparison Clinical judgement Peroxide gargle Random number table/No 95.3%/76.7% improved
5.2 Bao et al. 2008 [47 ] Lonicerae fl. Ophiopogonis r. Astragali memb. r. Gargle solution Randomized group comparison WHO scale Dobell’s solution gargle Yes *5/No 30%/5% improved for ulcer grading, no effect on healing time
5.3 Chen et al. 2005 [48 ] Lonicerae fl. Ophiopogonis r. Platycodonis r. Oral administration Randomized group comparison Ulcer size Furacilin gargle oral vit B1 + C metronidazol infusion Yes *5/No 93%/73.8% improved
5.4 Wu Zhu YF et al. 2009 [49 ] Lonicera fl. Glycyrrhiza r. Menthae hapl. h. Chrysanthemi fl. Ganoderma luc. Topical ice cube application Randomized group comparison WHO scale Dobell’s solution gargle Yes *5/No 86.9%/60.9% improved
5.5 Wang et al. 2006 [50 ] Sheng Mai San *1 Intravenous injection Randomized group comparison Clinical judgement Dexamethasone MCP ondansetr. injection Yes *5/No 94.5%/71.5% improved
5.6 Jin et al. 2009 [51 ] Bubali cornu, Callicarpae mac. fol. Oral administer. + gargle solution Randomized group comparison WHO scale VAS QOL Saline, gentamycin, tetrahydrofolate gargle/oral oryzanol Yes *5/No 93.3%/93.3%/7.8% improved
5.7 Hou et al. 2001 [52 ] Phellodendri c. Forsythiae fr. Galla chin. Verbenae h. Catechu Borneolum + salineGargle solution Randomized group comparison Clinical judgement No Yes *5/No 96.2%/76.1% improved
5.8/5.9 Zhu and Zhang 1993 [53 ] Yu Nu San
*2/Qing Wei San *3Oral administr. Case study, clinical allocation to group 1 or 2 Clinical judgement No No/No 83.9 improved/no control
5.10/5.11 Zhou et al. 2005 [54 ] Chrysanthemi fl. Gardeniae fr Hypericum perf. Scrophulariae r. Sophora tonk. r./Borax, Borneolum, Indigo naturalis Oral administration + gargle solution Randomized group comparison Ulcer size, quantity Vit B12, gentamicin and sodium bicarbonate gargle Yes *5/No 96.7% improved, shorter healing period/86.7% improved
5.12 Chen and Zheng 2005 [55 ] Codonopsitis r. Atractylodis mac. rh. Agastachis h. Glycyrrhiza r. Dioscoreae rh Astragali memb. r. Angelica sin. r. Alismatis rh. Lopatheri h. Rehmannia vir. r. + Centrum Wyeth Oral administr. + gargle solution Randomized group comparison WHO scale Vit B2 Envelope lottery/No 78.8%/33.3% improved
5.13 Sun 2007 [56 ] Modified Xie Huang San *4 + added modules Oral administr. Randomized group comparison WHO scale Vit B2 and Vit C Yes *5/No 98%/72% improved