C-Reactive Protein Levels in the Brugada Syndrome

Bonny, Aimé; Tonet, Joelci; Márquez, Manlio F.; De Sisti, Antonio; Temfemo, Abdou; Himbert, Caroline; Gueffaf, Fatima; Larrazet, Fabrice; Ditah, Ivo; Frank, Robert; Hidden-Lucet, Françoise; Fontaine, Guy

doi:https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/341521

Cardiology Research and Practice

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 341521 | https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/341521

C-Reactive Protein Levels in the Brugada Syndrome

Aimé Bonny,^1,2Joelci Tonet,²Manlio F. Márquez,³Antonio De Sisti,²Abdou Temfemo,⁴Caroline Himbert,²Fatima Gueffaf,⁵Fabrice Larrazet,¹Ivo Ditah,⁶Robert Frank,²Françoise Hidden-Lucet,²and Guy Fontaine²

Academic Editor: J. Brugada

Received30 Jul 2011

Revised12 Sept 2011

Accepted05 Oct 2011

Published29 Nov 2011

Abstract

Background. Inflammation in the Brugada syndrome (BrS) and its clinical implication have been little studied. Aims. To assess the level of inflammation in BrS patients. Methods. All studied BrS patients underwent blood samples drawn for C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at admission, prior to any invasive intervention. Patients with a previous ICD placement were controlled to exclude those with a recent (<14 days) shock. We divided subjects into symptomatic (syncope or aborted sudden death) and asymptomatic groups. In a multivariable analysis, we adjusted for significant variables (age, CRP ≥ 2 mg/L). Results. Fifty-four subjects were studied (mean age 45 ± 13 years, 49 (91%) male). Twenty (37%) were symptomatic. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Mean CRP level was 1,4 ± 0,9 mg/L in asymptomatic and 2,4 ± 1,4 mg/L in symptomatic groups (P = .003). In the multivariate model, CRP concentrations ≥ 2 mg/L remained an independent marker for being symptomatic (P = .018; 95% CI: 1.3 to 19.3). Conclusion. Inflammation seems to be more active in symptomatic BrS. C-reactive protein concentrations ≥ 2 mg/L might be associated with the previous symptoms in BrS. The value of inflammation as a risk factor of arrhythmic events in BrS needs to be studied.

1. Introduction

The Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac disorder occurring particularly in young, apparently healthy individuals and is associated with a variety of arrhythmias, mainly ventricular tachyarrhythmias that can induce syncope or sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) [1]. Patients with documented cardiac arrest should receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) [2]. In the remaining subjects, the best management is still a challenge. Long-term follow-up of this subgroup of patients has revealed a low accuracy of stratification based on only one risk factor [3]. A multiparametric approach, including more than one risk factor, may increase the likelihood to predict ventricular arrhythmias that can be prevented by an ICD.

Increased body of evidence links lethal ventricular arrhythmias with inflammatory states [4]. It is known that arrhythmic events in BrS are triggered by febrile states, independent of the etiology [5]. Amin et al. have proposed that “research is needed on the study of the in vivo effects of fever and its various aspects,” including “inflammatory cells and cytokines” [6]. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase reactant, whose levels rise in response to inflammation. Serum levels of CRP have been shown to be increased soon after the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in other arrhythmogenic diseases like arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) [7]. Serum levels of CRP in BrS and their possible clinical implications have not been studied before. We evaluated levels of CRP in a cohort of subjects with BrS.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

Patients of our BrS registry were carefully analyzed in terms of past medical history. They were referred for three main reasons: family screening of a BrS index case, unexplained syncope, or aborted SCA. At admission, a complete clinical history, including family antecedents with emphasis on SCA, was obtained. All patients underwent physical examination and cardiac work-up that included ECG, 2D echocardiography, signal averaged ECG (SAECG), ajmaline challenge (in the absence of spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern), and at least two of the following cardiac imaging studies: right ventricular angiography, cardiac MRI, or ventricular radionuclide imaging. The diagnosis of BrS was made if ECG displayed coved-type ST-segment elevation, either spontaneously or after a sodium channel blocker challenge, in at least one right precordial lead in conjunction with a documented ventricular fibrillation (VF), self-terminating polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), agonal nocturnal respiration, syncope, aborted SCA, or family history (<45 years) of SCA. Asymptomatic patients were compared with symptomatic (syncope and aborted SCA). Study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, and informed consent was obtained from each participant.

2.2. Blood Testing

At admission, for work-up and before any cardiac intervention such as drug challenge, EP study, cardiac catheterization, or ICD implantation; as part of the routine blood sampling, CRP concentration was measured in each patient by immunoturbidimetric method (Integra 400 Roche, France). For characterization of inflammatory state, only CRP measurements were performed. Data were collected retrospectively, and we verify that no recent arrhythmic event had occurred prior to blood sample testing. In those patients with established diagnosis of BrS and carriers of an ICD, a device interrogation was performed to exclude recent (<14 days) shock discharge.

2.3. Study Covariates

Hypertension was defined as diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or a patient on antihypertensive medication. Diabetes mellitus was based on a fasting blood sugar ≥ 7 mmol/L and/or on insulin regimen or on any other antidiabetic treatment. Smoking was classified into ever and never smokers. Lipid lowering treatment was statin treatment with anti-inflammatory properties. Aspirin, even when a low dose is used, has the potential to influence CRP release [8]. Brugada-ECG pattern displayed coved-type ST-segment elevation in through . Wide QRS was duration of QRS > 120 ms. Other covariates of interest were age, atrial fibrillation (AF), drug challenge by ajmaline test, family history of SCD, and ICD placement for high-risk status or for secondary prevention.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as if they demonstrated a normal distribution and as median (range) otherwise. Means of continuous variables that showed normal distribution were compared with the Student’s t-test for independent samples. Continuous variables that did not show a normal distribution were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were summarized as proportions and compared using the or the Fischer exact test if cell counts were less than 5. For the multivariate model, only factors that attained statistical significance () in the univariate analysis were included. A 2-tailed value was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 11.0.1 software (SPSS Inc). Figure 2 was performed with Statistica v6.0 (StatSoft Inc).

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Baseline Population

The study sample consisted of 54 patients, with a mean age of years old and 49 (91%) being male. Twenty (37%) were symptomatic (17 syncope and 3 aborted SCA) (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups apart from the younger age of those in the asymptomatic group ( versus , Table 1). The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the whole cohort was 15% hypertension, 15% smokers, 17% hypercholesterolemia, and 2% diabetes with no differences among groups (Table 1). Fifteen (28%) patients had family history of SCA, and 33 (61%) had spontaneous, diagnostic, coved-type ECG.

3.2. Comparison between Patients with and without Symptoms

Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were comparable in gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and main ECG features (first-degree atrioventricular block, wide QRS, and coved type ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads). Mean age and CRP levels were the only parameters significantly different in univariate analysis between both groups. In Table 1 is also shown the multivariate analysis for predictors of being symptomatic. A significant value was still found for age and levels of CRP ≥ 2 mg/L (, CI 95% 1.56–22.08, and , CI 95% 1.32–19.31, resp.).

3.3. Clinical Features of Patients with ICD

Implantation of an ICD started in our centre before current recommendations [2]. Therefore, 10 asymptomatic patients (29%) were implanted for high-risk status (spontaneous coved-type ST-segment elevation in conjunction with either family history of SCA or positive EP study). None of these 10 patients have experienced ICD shock, and their electrogram memories did not show ventricular arrhythmias. In 16 (80%) symptomatic patients, an ICD was implanted either before hospitalization (>3 months) or after blood sampling was taken for CRP. Four out of 16 (25%) had appropriate ICD shock during follow-up.

3.4. Inflammatory Pattern and Its Relationship with Cardiac Arrhythmic Events

As previously mentioned, levels of CRP were significantly different in both groups, asymptomatic versus symptomatic subjects. The mean CRP levels (Figure 2) were 1,40,9 mg/L in asymptomatic and 2,41,4 mg/L in symptomatic group (). CRP concentration ≥ 2 mg/L was an independent marker for being symptomatic (; 95% CI: 1.3 to 19.3) (Table 2). A CRP concentration ≥ 2 mg/L was significantly associated with type 1 ECG pattern (), syncope (), syncope and/or aborted SCA (), and the decision to implant an ICD () in univariate analysis. After multivariate analysis, only overall symptoms (syncope and/or resuscitated SCA) remained significantly different (, 95% CI: 1.07–18,79) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to assess the inflammatory profile measured by CRP in individuals with BrS. The study also looked at the association between past history of arrhythmic events and CRP level.

4.1. Major Findings

This study shows that patients with BrS syndrome and life-threatening symptoms such as syncope or sudden death have more active inflammation than those without symptoms. Moreover, a CRP level ≥ 2 mg/L is more frequent in the presence of previous cardiac arrhythmic events.

4.2. Inflammation and Cardiovascular Outcomes

CRP is a biomarker of inflammation, and high levels have been associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality [9]. It predicts cardiovascular events such as stroke, coronary heart disease, and peripheral vascular disease [10, 11]. Serum CRP levels greater than 3 mg/L have been shown to predict these cardiovascular events [12], and anti-inflammatory agents such as statins have demonstrated a reduction of cardiovascular mortality in patients with normal lipid profile [13]. It is well known that systemic inflammation is associated with arrhythmias. This association has been extensively studied in atrial fibrillation (AF) [14]. It has been shown that increased CRP levels are associated with greater risk of AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion [15]. Moreover, dilated cardiomyopathy patients with AF have higher inflammatory activation than those without AF [16]. Ventricular arrhythmia incidence is associated with significantly elevated proinflammatory markers such as IL-6 and high-sensitive CRP in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients with structural heart disease [4]. Enhanced inflammatory response is related to the development of ventricular arrhythmias after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. During acute myocardial ischemia, patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias experience higher systemic inflammation than those without them [17]. Consistent with the later, statins which have anti-inflammatory properties [18] are associated with decreased incidence of VT [19–22]. However, recent data has suggested that inflammatory biomarkers such as IL-6, TNF-alpha, hsCRP, fibrinogen, and BNP are not predictive of intermediate-term risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in stable chronic heart failure [23]. Regarding the value of inflammation in predicting SCA in apparently healthy populations, controversial issues have been reported. Empana et al. have not found any association between inflammatory biomarkers and SCA in middle-aged men whereas other data suggest that CRP levels may be useful in identifying apparently healthy men who are at an increased long-term risk of SCD [24, 25]. Whether inflammatory activation is the cause or the consequence of ventricular arrhythmias is unclear. We have reported high CRP concentration in ARVD/C soon after VT with a clear tendency to decrease its level after the event [7].

4.3. Inflammation and the Brugada Syndrome

We found that a single plasma value of CRP concentration is robustly associated with either syncope or SCA in BrS. Studies assessing inflammatory patterns in BrS have reported controversial findings. One did not detect inflammatory changes in cardiac biopsies [26]. Others found locally restricted inflammation due to parvovirus B19 [27, 28]. Frustaci et al. reported histological evidence of a prevalent or localized right ventricular myocarditis in 14 out of 18 BrS patients who underwent endomyocardial biopsy [29]. The range of CRP between 1 and 3 mg/L was considered intermediate risk. In the symptomatic group of patients, the median level of CRP was 2 mg/L, which is above the value known in the general population [9–12]. Therefore, we hypothesized that this value of CRP may discriminate between individuals with and without symptoms. This hypothesis was confirmed by the finding that symptoms were more frequent in the subgroup with CRP levels ≥ 2 mg/L (Table 2). Interestingly, when adjusted for age, CRP ≥ 2 mg/L remained an independent factor for being symptomatic (Table 1). The significant association of CRP concentration with symptoms suggests that inflammation might play a role in the pathophysiology of arrhythmias in BrS.

We consider this finding relevant for risk stratification in BrS. With an increasing number of patients being diagnosed with BrS, our knowledge has also grown in every single aspect of this disease. However, estimation of the likelihood to die suddenly remains difficult in the absence of resuscitated SCA [30]. For example, although all registries agree on the fact that patients with syncope have a poor prognosis, it has been documented that some syncope episodes in BrS patients are in fact due to a vasovagal mechanism [31, 32]. Thus, the decision to implant an ICD in syncope-related BrS patients, even in the setting of EP-induced VF, is challenging when taking into account the incidence of ICD-related complications, which is up to 28%, and death-related ICD malfunction [33, 34]. Therefore, a multiparametric approach consisting in considering diagnostic type 1 ECG pattern in conjunction with syncope and at least one other risk factor has been suggested [3]. To summarize, the risk/benefit ratio of ICD placement in this young population is difficult to estimate [35]. Therefore, there is dire need for de novo risk markers for arrhythmic events. These data show a sharp departure from the current view that BrS has a polyfactorial pathogenesis which may include inflammatory pathway. Indeed, knowledge regarding the clinical spectrum of patients with a Brugada ECG is important to implement effective risk stratification and management [36, 37]. The results presented herein may be useful to identify high-risk patients in need of primary or secondary prevention by an ICD and during the follow-up of implanted patients to detect those at risk to present ventricular arrhythmias. However, larger clinical trials are needed to confirm the increase of inflammatory activity in symptomatic Brugada syndrome.

Study Limitations
The strength of the study is that it is the first to our knowledge to evaluate CRP as a marker of inflammation in BrS. This may help provide a better understanding of the large spectrum of the disease. However, there are some potential limitations which merit consideration. First, we did not use the nephelometric technique assessing high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) which is about a 10-fold more sensitive than the immunoturbidimetric assay used in this study. Secondly, few patients in our series (11 out of 54 (20%)) have been genotyped and only one displayed a mutation in SCN5A gene. Therefore, a correlation between genotype and inflammation could not be established. This is a very pertinent lack of information as there is a bunch of literature showing that loss-of-function SCN5A mutations lead to fibrosis and structural heart disease [38, 39], emphasizing that CRP might rise via this pathway.

5. Conclusion

CRP levels are increased in symptomatic patients with BrS. The causative role of inflammation in occurrence of arrhythmic events in this disease needs to be further studied.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

The authors present this work on behalf of the Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification for Sudden Death in patients with Inflammation pattern (CARISDI) study group.

References

P. Brugada and J. Brugada, “Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1391–1396, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Antzelevich, P. Brugada, M. Borggrefe et al., “Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference,” Heart Rhythm, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 429–440, 2005, Erratum in: Heart Rhythm, vol. 2, pp. 905.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Delise, G. Allocca, E. Marras et al., “Risk stratification in individuals with the Brugada type 1 ECG pattern without previous cardiac arrest: usefulness of a combined clinical and electrophysiologic approach,” European Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 169–176, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Streitner, J. Kuschyk, C. Veltmann et al., “Role of proinflammatory markers and NT-proBNP in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and an electrical storm,” Cytokine, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 166–172, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Pasquié, “May fever trigger ventricular fibrillation?” Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
A. S. Amin, C. A. Klemens, A. O. Verkerk et al., “Fever-triggered ventricular arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome and type 2 long-QT syndrome,” Netherlands Heart Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 165–169, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Bonny, N. Lellouche, I. Ditah et al., “C-reactive protein in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/ cardiomyopathy and relationship with ventricular tachycardia,” Cardiology Research and Practice, vol. 1, no. 1, Article ID 919783, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Prasad, “C-reactive protein (CRP)-lowering agents,” Cardiovascular Drug Reviews, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zacho, A. Tybjærg-Hansen, and B. G. Nordestgaard, “C-reactive protein and all-cause mortality-the copenhagen city heart study,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 13, pp. 1624–1632, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. K. Pai, T. Pischon, J. Ma et al., “Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 25, pp. 2599–2610, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Ridker, C. H. Hennekens, J. E. Buring, and N. Rifai, “C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342, no. 12, pp. 836–843, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Pearson, S. N. Blair, S. R. Daniels et al., “AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 Update: consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 388–391, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Ridker, E. Danielson, F. A. H. Fonseca et al., “Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 21, pp. 2195–2207, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Conen, P. M. Ridker, B. M. Everett et al., “A multimarker approach to assess the influence of inflammation on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in women,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 1730–1736, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. A. Henningsen, S. K. Therkelsen, H. Bruunsgaard, K. S. Krabbe, B. K. Pedersen, and J. H. Svendsen, “Prognostic impact of hs-CRP and IL-6 in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation treated with electrical cardioversion,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 425–432, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dai, S. Zhang, H. G. Ying, J. Chu, W. Hua, and Z. W. Fang, “C-reactive protein and atrial fibrillation in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. E45–E50, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kaneko, T. Anzai, K. Naito et al., “Role of ischemic preconditioning and inflammatory response in the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias after reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction,” Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 775–781, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Charles-Schoeman, D. Khanna, D. E. Furst et al., “Effects of high-dose atorvastatin on antiinflammatory properties of high density lipoprotein in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1459–1464, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
J. H. Chiu, R. H. Abdelhadi, M. K. Chung et al., “Effect of statin therapy on risk of ventricular arrhythmia among patients with coronary artery disease and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 490–491, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. De Sutter, R. Tavernier, M. De Buyzere, L. Jordaens, and G. De Backer, “Lipid lowering drugs and recurrences of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in high-risk patients,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 766–772, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. B. Mitchell, J. L. Powell, A. M. Gillis, V. Kehl, and A. P. Hallstrom, “Are lipid-lowering drugs also antiarrhythmic drugs? An analysis of the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Vyas, H. Guo, A. J. Moss et al., “Reduction in ventricular tachyarrhythmias with statins in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial (MADIT)-II,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 769–773, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Konstantino, J. Kusniec, R. Tamar et al., “Inflammatory biomarkers are not predictive of intermediate-term risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in stable CHF patients,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 408–413, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Empana, X. Jouven, F. Canouï-Poitrine et al., “C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, fibrinogen and risk of sudden death in European middle-aged men: the PRIME study,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2047–2052, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Albert, J. Ma, N. Rifai, M. J. Stampfer, and P. M. Ridker, “Prospective study of C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and plasma lipid levels as predictors of sudden cardiac death,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 22, pp. 2595–2599, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zumhagen, T. Spieker, J. Rolinck et al., “Absence of pathognomonic or inflammatory patterns in cardiac biopsies from patients with brugada syndrome,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chimenti, F. Calabrese, G. Thiene, M. Pieroni, A. Maseri, and A. Frustaci, “Inflammatory left ventricular microaneurysms as a cause of apparently idiopathic ventricular tachyarrhythmias,” Circulation, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 168–173, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Buob, S. Siaplaouras, I. Janzen et al., “Focal parvovirus B19 myocarditis in a patient with Brugada syndrome,” Cardiology in Review, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Frustaci, S. G. Priori, M. Pieroni et al., “Cardiac histological substrate in patients with clinical phenotype of Brugada syndrome,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 24, pp. 3680–3687, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Probst, C. Veltmann, L. Eckardt et al., “Long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with brugada syndrome: results from the finger brugada syndrome registry,” Circulation, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 635–643, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yokokawa, H. Okamura, T. Noda et al., “Neurally mediated syncope as a cause of syncope in patients with brugada electrocardiogram,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 186–192, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kostopoulou, M. Koutelou, G. Theodorakis et al., “Disorders of the autonomic nervous system in patients with Brugada syndrome: a pilot study,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 773–780, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sacher, V. Probst, Y. Iesaka et al., “Outcome after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome: a multicenter study,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 22, pp. 2317–2324, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Rosso, A. Glick, M. Glikson et al., “Outcome after implantation of cardioverter defribrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome: a multicenter Israeli Study (ISRABRU),” Israel Medical Association Journal, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 435–439, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Brugada, J. Brugada, and R. Brugada, “When our best is not enough: the death of a teenager with Brugada syndrome,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 108–109, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Brugada, “Commentary on the Brugada ECG pattern a marker of channelopathy, structural heart disease, or neither? Toward a unifying mechanism of the Brugada syndrome,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 280–282, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Fowler and S. G. Priori, “Clinical spectrum of patients with a Brugada ECG,” Current Opinion in Cardiology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 74–81, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Probst, F. Kyndt, F. Potet et al., “Haploinsufficiency in combination with aging causes SCN5A-linked hereditary lenègre disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 643–652, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Royer, T. A. B. Van Veen, S. Le Bouter et al., “Mouse model of SCN5A-linked hereditary Lenègre's: disease age-related conduction slowing and myocardial fibrosis,” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 14, pp. 1738–1746, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Aimé Bonny et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1268

Downloads

1037

Citations