Research Article
Fama–French Three-Factor Versus Daniel-Titman Characteristics Model: A Comparative Study of Asset Pricing Models from India
Table 5
Fama–French regression results for the portfolios constructed on size, B/M equity, and HML loadings.
| | A | β | s | H | Adj. R2 |
| S-L-l | −0.002 (−0.711) | 0.994 (19.746) | 0.797 (7.042) | −0.168 (−2.360) | 0.728 | S-L-h | −0.010 (−3.581) | 1.005 (14.081) | 0.784 (7.075) | 0.033 (0.487) | 0.758 | B-L-l | −0.001 (−0.692) | 0.921 (22.341) | 0.194 (2.309) | −0.169 (−3.366) | 0.789 | B-L-h | −0.005 (−1.875) | 0.967 (11.425) | 0.078 (0.864) | 0.057 (1.042) | 0.726 | S-M-l | −0.002 (−0.488) | 0.914 (17.157) | 0.977 (9.957) | 0.086 (1.068) | 0.716 | S-M-h | −0.005 (−1.391) | 1.019 (15.447) | 1.211 (10.012) | 0.243 (2.532) | 0.777 | B-M-l | −0.004 (−1.421) | 0.982 (26.659) | 0.198 (2.639) | 0.282 (6.654) | 0.809 | B-M-h | −0.007 (−2.320) | 1.117 (14.299) | 0.289 (2.736) | 0.533 (6.767) | 0.812 | S-H-l | −0.003 (−1.052) | 0.909 (17.246) | 1.422 (11.950) | 0.601 (6.379) | 0.824 | S-H-h | −0.002 (−0.746) | 1.018 (18.793) | 1.470 (10.820) | 0.768 (12.241) | 0.842 | B-H-l | −0.008 (−3.315) | 0.971 (15.607) | 0.488 (4.083) | 0.661 (8.510) | 0.810 | B-H-h | 0.001 (0.117) | 0.944 (8.970) | −0.007 (−0.025) | 1.375 (5.650) | 0.771 |
|
|