A Pulse Signal Preprocessing Method Based on the Chauvenet Criterion
Table 3
Comparisons of the execution time between the proposed Chauvenet-based method and the Romanovsky-based method.
No.
CET (s)
RET (s)
CET (s)
RET (s)
CET (s)
RET (s)
1
1.54
12.73
1.56
111.98
1.75
1040.93
2
1.55
12.56
1.56
113.40
1.75
1041.74
3
1.54
12.59
1.56
112.80
1.73
1022.54
4
1.56
12.54
1.56
109.51
1.79
1033.36
5
1.54
12.60
1.56
113.33
1.75
1023.35
6
1.55
12.58
1.56
112.52
1.75
1035.48
7
1.54
12.60
1.56
111.50
1.73
1029.24
8
1.54
12.55
1.57
111.98
1.74
1034.65
9
1.54
12.58
1.56
112.08
1.76
1037.84
10
1.55
12.66
1.57
112.13
1.74
1025.65
Average
1.54
12.60
1.56
112.12
1.75
1032.48
Note. N stands for the segments of pulse signals processed by the two methods and CET and RET represent the execution time using the proposed Chauvenet-based method and the Romanovsky-based method, respectively.
