Research Article
A Pulse Signal Preprocessing Method Based on the Chauvenet Criterion
Table 2
Comparisons of recognition rate and prediction rate among ORIP-Apnea, Denoising–Apnea, and PREP-Apnea.
| No. | ORIP-Apnea | Denoising-Apnea | PREP-Apnea | RR (%) | PR (%) | RR (%) | PR (%) | RR (%) | PR (%) |
| 1 | 78.41 | 78.02 | 79.12 | 79.04 | 81.74 | 80.92 | 2 | 78.64 | 78.80 | 78.68 | 79.09 | 82.51 | 81.51 | 3 | 77.13 | 77.04 | 78.76 | 79.02 | 82.37 | 81.07 | 4 | 78.16 | 78.55 | 79.84 | 79.44 | 80.82 | 80.91 | 5 | 77.28 | 76.11 | 79.64 | 79.12 | 81.67 | 80.87 | 6 | 77.62 | 78.42 | 78.58 | 78.86 | 82.02 | 81.33 | 7 | 79.33 | 76.16 | 79.23 | 79.17 | 81.33 | 81.58 | 8 | 78.50 | 78.22 | 78.65 | 78.83 | 82.56 | 80.04 | 9 | 77.82 | 77.92 | 79.26 | 79.01 | 83.55 | 82.02 | 10 | 78.21 | 76.83 | 79.43 | 79.06 | 81.03 | 80.37 | Average | 78.11 | 77.61 | 79.12 | 79.06 | 81.96 | 81.06 |
|
|