A Pulse Signal Preprocessing Method Based on the Chauvenet Criterion

Table 2

Comparisons of recognition rate and prediction rate among ORIP-Apnea, Denoising–Apnea, and PREP-Apnea.

No.	ORIP-Apnea		Denoising-Apnea		PREP-Apnea
	RR (%)	PR (%)	RR (%)	PR (%)	RR (%)	PR (%)
1	78.41	78.02	79.12	79.04	81.74	80.92
2	78.64	78.80	78.68	79.09	82.51	81.51
3	77.13	77.04	78.76	79.02	82.37	81.07
4	78.16	78.55	79.84	79.44	80.82	80.91
5	77.28	76.11	79.64	79.12	81.67	80.87
6	77.62	78.42	78.58	78.86	82.02	81.33
7	79.33	76.16	79.23	79.17	81.33	81.58
8	78.50	78.22	78.65	78.83	82.56	80.04
9	77.82	77.92	79.26	79.01	83.55	82.02
10	78.21	76.83	79.43	79.06	81.03	80.37
Average	78.11	77.61	79.12	79.06	81.96	81.06