Research Article
Breast Cancer Detection with Reduced Feature Set
Table 7
Comparison of the methods and accuracy of previous studies and this study.
| Author | Method | Feature number | Accuracy | Sensitivity |
|
Krishnan et al. [36] | 40% test data, SVM (poly.) | 30 | 92.62% | 92.69% | 40% test data, SVM (RBF) | 93.72% | 94.50% |
|
Bagui et al. [37] | 64% test data, -RNN | 30 | 96.00% | 95.09% | 64% test data, -RNN | Best 3 | 98.10% | 98.05% |
|
Sweilam et al. [38] | PSO + SVM | 30 | 93.52% | 91.52% | QPSO + SVM | 93.06% | 90.00% |
| Mangasarian et al. [39] | 10-CV, MSM-T | Best 3 | 97.50% | ā |
|
Mert et al. [40] | 10-CV, PNN | 3 (2IC + DWT) | 96.31% | 98.88% | LOO, PNN | 97.01% | 97.78% |
| Zheng et al. [41] | -SVM | 6 | 97.38% | ā |
| This study | 10-CV, -NN | 1 feature reduced by ICA | 91.03% | 94.67% | 40% test, -NN | 92.56% | 94.02% | 10-CV, ANN | 90.50% | 96.91% | 40% test, ANN | 90.89% | 97.00% | 10-CV, RBFNN | 90.49% | 96.63% | 40% test, RBFNN | 89.98% | 96.01% | 10-CV, SVM (linear) | 90.33% | 96.35% | 40% test, SVM (linear) | 90.01% | 95.00% | 10-CV, SVM (quadratic) | 89.98% | 95.24% | 40% test, SVM (quadratic) | 91.01% | 96.42% | 10-CV, SVM (RBF) | 90.86% | 97.47% | 40% test, SVM (RBF) | 91.03% | 97.56% |
|
|