The Cell Envelope Integrity Protein Homologue D0Y85_RS06240 of <i>Stenotrophomonas</i> Confers Multiantibiotic Resistance

Zhong, Chuanqing; Deng, Xiaoqiang; Jiang, Aihua; Liu, Yayu; Liu, Yuanyuan; Fu, Jiafang; Cao, Guangxiang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7547514

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Additional Points Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 7547514 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7547514

The Cell Envelope Integrity Protein Homologue D0Y85_RS06240 of Stenotrophomonas Confers Multiantibiotic Resistance

Chuanqing Zhong,¹Xiaoqiang Deng,¹Aihua Jiang,²Yayu Liu,³Yuanyuan Liu,¹Jiafang Fu,³and Guangxiang Cao³

Academic Editor: Keke Zhang

Received29 Aug 2023

Revised19 Dec 2023

Accepted13 Jan 2024

Published20 Jan 2024

Abstract

Background. The potential role of cell envelope integrity proteins in mediating antibiotic resistance is not well understood. In this study, we investigated whether the cell envelope integrity protein D0Y85_RS06240 from the multiantibiotic resistant strain Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 mediates antibiotic resistance. Methods. Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to identify proteins related to the D0Y85_RS06240 protein. The D0Y85_RS06240 gene was heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli, both antibiotic MICs and the effect of efflux pump inhibitors on antibiotic MICs were determined by the broth microdilution method. A combination of antibiotic and efflux pump inhibitor was used to investigate bacterial killing kinetics, and binding of D0Y85_RS06240 to antibiotic molecules was predicted by molecular docking analysis. Results. Sequence homology analysis revealed that D0Y85_RS06240 was related to cell envelope integrity proteins. The D0Y85_RS06240 heterologous expression strains were resistant to multiple antibiotics, including colistin, tetracycline, and cefixime. However, the efflux pump inhibitor N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) reduced the antibiotic MICs of the D0Y85_RS06240 heterologous expression strain, and bacterial killing kinetics revealed that NMP enhanced the bactericidal rate of tetracycline to the drug-resistant bacteria. Molecular docking analysis indicated that D0Y85_RS06240 could bind colistin, tetracycline, and cefixime. Conclusion. The cell envelope integrity protein D0Y85_RS06240 in Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 mediates multiantibiotic resistance. This study lays the foundation for an in-depth analysis of D0Y85_RS06240-mediated antibiotic resistance mechanisms and the use of D0Y85_RS06240 as a target for the treatment of multiantibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.

1. Introduction

The long-term overuse of antibiotics in the aquaculture and medical fields has led to increasing concentrations of antibiotics in the environment [1], and evolutionary pressure from antibiotic exposure can select for bacterial antibiotic resistance, reducing the therapeutic effect of antibiotics [2]. Bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics mainly through enzymatic degradation, efflux pumps, and target site modification, mechanisms that can enable resistance to one or more antibiotics [3]. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the corresponding antibiotic resistance genes are considered new environmental pollutants and pose great risks in the environment [4–6]. For example, sulfonamide- and tetracycline-resistant opportunistic bacteria (e.g., Acinetobacter spp.) and the corresponding antibiotic resistance genes (e.g., tetM, tetO, tetT, tetW, sul1, and sul2) were enriched in an aquaculture environment [7]. The increasing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria that pollute soil and water environments, and particularly the increasing number of “superbugs,” is a direct or indirect threat to human health [8].

Efflux pumps have been reported to mediate multiple antibiotic resistances in bacteria and are capable of transporting antibiotics out of the bacterial cell. Efflux pumps lower intracellular antibiotic concentrations, allowing bacteria to survive under greater concentrations of antibiotics [9]. Studies have shown that some membrane integrins also act as efflux pumps that mediate bacterial tolerance to various compounds including antibiotics. Mascio et al. found that the integral membrane protein ArsB is involved in bacterial arsenite and antimonate resistance [10], and members of the DedA family of membrane integrins, which are widespread in bacteria, are associated with resistance to multiple antibiotics [11]. However, the characteristics and specific functions of cell envelope integrity proteins need to be further studied.

The bacterial species Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause nosocomial infections, and its increasingly broad antibiotic resistance can seriously impact the health of patients [12]. Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 is a multiple antibiotic-resistant strain, which is phylogenetically distinct from S. maltophilia [13]. Genome annotation identified the Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 gene D0Y85_RS06240 as a cell envelope integrity protein, and our goals in this study were to investigate whether D0Y85_RS06240 might contribute to the antibiotic resistance of this strain. Two heterologous expression strains containing D0Y85_RS06240 were constructed to analyze the effect of D0Y85_RS06240 on antibiotic resistance and to gain further insights into the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Vectors

The Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 strain was isolated from sewage water by our research group and maintained in our laboratory [13]. Escherichia coli DH5α was purchased from Shanghai Angyu Biotechnology Co., and the pMD18-T vector was purchased from Beijing Takara Company. E. coli strain DR06240 and strain DP06240 were constructed in this study.

2.2. Primers

The primers used in this study were synthesized by Biological Bioengineering (Shanghai), and the primer sequences are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Construction of Strain DR06240 Expressing D0Y85_RS06240 from Its Native Promoter

Gene D0Y85_RS06240 along with its 148-bp native promoter was amplified by PCR with primer pair RS06240-F/RS06240-R (Table 1), using genomic DNA of Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 as a template. The PCR products were recovered and ligated with the vector pMD18-T to generate a recombinant vector pMD-RS06240, which was transformed into E. coli DH5α. Transformants were screened, and the selected transformant was named strain DR06240. The presence of pMD-RS06240 in DR06240 was confirmed by extraction of the recombinant vector followed by restriction enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing.

2.4. Construction of Strain DP06240 Expressing D0Y85_RS06240 from a Constitutive E. coli Promoter

The reading frame sequence of the D0Y85_RS06240 gene was amplified by PCR with primer pair P06240-F/P06240-R (Table 1) and G4 genomic DNA as a template. At the same time, a constitutive promoter DNA fragment of E. coli was amplified with a primer pair AP-F/AP-R (Table 1) and the pMD18-T vector as template. The above PCR products were then mixed to serve as PCR template, and PCR overlapping was used to amplify the fusion fragment of the E. coli promoter and the D0Y85_RS06240 gene with primer pair AP-F and P06240-R. Then, the PCR product was recovered, ligated with the pMD18-T vector to generate the recombinant vector pMD-P06240, and then pMD-P06240 was transferred into E. coli DH5α, followed by screening of transformants, with the selected transformant named DP06240. The presence of pMD-P06240 in DP06240 was confirmed by extraction of the recombinant vector followed by restriction enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing.

2.5. Measurement of Antibiotic MICs by the Broth Microdilution Method

The antibiotic MICs of strain DR06240 and DP06240 were determined using the broth microdilution method [14]. Cultures in the log phase of growth (OD₆₀₀ = 0.6) were diluted to 1 × 10⁶ to 2 × 10⁶ colony-forming units/mL (CFU/mL), and then 100 μL of LB liquid medium and 100 μL diluted were added per well in a 96-well plate with or without antibiotics. Then, the 96-well plate was placed in a 37°C incubator for 16–24 h. The OD₆₀₀ values were determined by microplate absorbance reader (HBS-1096C, Detie) using strain DH5α carrying the pMD18-T vector as control. Five replicates of each sample were set up for each treatment.

2.6. Analysis of the Effects of Efflux Pump Inhibitors on Antibiotic MICs

The effects of efflux pump inhibitors on the antibiotic MICs of the test strains were also analyzed using the broth microdilution method [14]. The selected efflux pump inhibitors were verapamil (VER), reserpine (RES), carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) [15]. First, the effects of different concentrations of VER, RES, CCCP, and NMP on the growth of the test strains were determined by the broth microdilution method in order to identify the maximum concentration that did not inhibit strain growth. Then, the antibiotic MICs were determined in the presence of the identified concentrations of the efflux pump inhibitors.

2.7. Bacterial Killing Kinetics Assay

The bacterial killing kinetics assay was carried out as previously described with some modifications [16, 17]. Strain DP06240 was cultured in LB broth to exponential phase and diluted to 10⁶ CFU/mL with fresh LB broth. Then, 32 mg/L tetracycline (TET group), 8 mg/L NMP (NMP group), or 32 mg/L tetracycline and 8 mg/L NMP (COM group) were added to the bacterial suspensions followed by incubation at 37°C for 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min. Untreated bacteria were used as the control group. At each time point, 100 μL bacterial cultures were taken and diluted 1000-fold with fresh LB broth, and 100 μL of the dilution was spread on LB solid medium. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight, and the colonies were counted.

2.8. D0Y85_RS06240 Sequence Alignment Analysis

The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) program was used to obtain the functional information and amino acid sequence of the protein encoded by the D0Y85_RS06240 gene. Gene annotation was also performed using the RASTtk server [18]. The NCBI-BLASTp online program was applied to find homologous proteins of D0Y85_RS06240 (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), and the amino acid sequences of the homologous proteins were input into the CLUSTALW software for comparison. The ESPript3 program was used to view the alignment results [19].

2.9. Molecular Docking Analysis of the D0Y85_RS06240 Protein and Antibiotics

The homology modeling of D0Y85_RS06240 protein was performed using SWISS-MODEL online software (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) to predict the 3D model of D0Y85_RS06240 protein, and the small molecule ligand website (https://www.chemspider.com/) was used to find the molecular structures of the selected antibiotics for analysis. Then, the 3D model of protein D0Y85_RS06240 and the molecular structure of each antibiotic were imported into Discovery Studio 2.0 software, and the docking analysis was performed by applying the precise molecular docking technique (CDOCKER) [20].

3. Results

3.1. Amino Acid Sequence Analysis of D0Y85_RS06240 and Homologous Proteins

Genome annotation indicated that D0Y85_RS06240 encodes a cell envelope integrity protein in the Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 strain. Comparative analysis showed that the amino acid similarity of D0Y85_RS06240 with the CreD cell envelope integrity proteins from S. maltophilia KJ, Pseudoxanthomonas composti GSS15, and Pseudoxanthomonas aeruginosa PAO1 was 76.4%, 57.7%, and 42.5%, respectively (Figure 1). Notably, CreD in P. aeruginosa PAO1 was found to be associated with β-lactam antibiotic resistance [21].

3.2. Heterologous Expression of D0Y85_RS06240 in E. coli

In this study, we constructed E. coli strains DR06240 and DP06240, which contain gene D0Y85_RS06240 controlled by its native promoter or by a constitutive E. coli promoter, respectively. The presence of the recombinant vector pMD-RS06240 in strain DR06240 and pMD-P06240 in strain DP06240 was verified as shown in Figure 2 and were further confirmed by DNA sequencing. Hence, both the restriction enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing confirmed the successful construction of the recombinant strains DR06240 and DP06240.

(a)

(b)

3.3. Antibiotic MICs of the Recombinant Strains

The antibiotic MICs of the DR06240 and DP06240 strains were determined by the microdilution method, using the DH5α (18T) strain carrying the pMD18-T vector as a control (Table 2). Results showed that strain DR06240 had increased resistance to colistin and tetracycline, as the MIC values were 4 mg/L and 16 mg/L, respectively, which were higher than the MICs for the control strain DH5α (18T). However, the MICs of colistin, cefixime, and tetracycline for the strain DP06240 were ≥128 mg/L, 32 mg/L, and ≥128 mg/L, respectively, which were markedly higher than those of DH5α (18T) and DR06240.

3.4. Efflux Pump Inhibitor NMP Inhibits the Function of D0Y85_RS06240

Antibiotic MIC values indicated that the DP06240 strain was markedly resistant to colistin, tetracycline, and cefixime. To test whether the D0Y85_RS06240 protein acts as an efflux pump, we examined the effects of the known efflux pump inhibitors VER, RES, CCCP, and NMP on the antibiotic MICs of DP06240. For this assay, we selected concentrations of the inhibitors that had no significant effect on the growth of strain DP06240, specifically, 8 mg/L VER, 8 mg/L RES, 0.1 mg/L CCCP, and 8 mg/L NMP. Results showed that the proton-pump inhibitors VER, RES, and CCCP had no effect on the antibiotic MICs of strain DP06240 (Table 3). In contrast, the inhibitor NMP markedly reduced the colistin and tetracycline MICs of strain DP06240, lowering the colistin MIC value from ≥128 mg/L to 64 mg/L, the cefixime MIC value from 32 mg/L to 16 mg/L, and the tetracycline MIC value from ≥128 mg/L to 16 mg/L (Table 3).

3.5. Bactericidal Effect of Tetracycline Combined with NMP on Strain DP06240

To test the antimicrobial effect of tetracycline combined with NMP, a bacterial killing kinetics assay was performed using a colony-counting method. Results indicated that tetracycline combined with NMP showed rapid killing kinetics toward strain DP06240, with declines in CFU observable following 30 to 60 min of exposure when compared to tetracycline alone (Table 4). Even more notably, the CFU level dropped to zero when the incubation time was extended to 180 min, which implied that the antimicrobial effect of the tetracycline/NMP combination was bactericidal rather than bacteriostatic. In contrast, tetracycline alone could not completely eliminate E. coli DP06240.

3.6. Molecular Docking of the D0Y85_RS06240 Protein with Antibiotics

A homology model of D0Y85_RS06240 was constructed based on the crystal structure of 5khs s.1, an efflux transporter from Burkholderia multivorans. Molecular docking analysis showed that the pore structure formed by a D0Y85_RS06240 dimer could bind to colistin, cefixime, and tetracycline (Figure 3), but not bind to florfenicol, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, or kanamycin, which was consistent with the antibiotic MICs for the D0Y85_RS06240 recombinant strains. Binding site analysis showed that colistin binds to amino acid residues Thr390, Ala395, Tyr397, Gly398, and Leu399 of the D0Y85_RS06240 protein (Figure 3(a)); cefixime binds to amino acid residues Ala369, Leu383, Ala386, Thr390, and Val391 (Figure 3(b)); and tetracycline binds to amino acid residues Thr390, Val391, Gly394, and Ala395 (Figure 3(c)). In addition, molecular docking analysis showed that colistin, cefixime, and tetracycline all bind to the C-terminal amino acid residues of the dimeric D0Y85_RS06240 protein.

(a)

(b)

(c)

4. Discussion

Amino acid sequence analysis revealed that the cell envelope integrity protein D0Y85_RS06240 from Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 is highly homologous to the cell envelope integrity protein CreD from S. maltophilia, P. composti, and P. aeruginosa. CreD of P. aeruginosa PAO1 was reported to be associated with β-lactam antibiotic resistance [21], whereas CreD of S. maltophilia KJ was found not to be associated with β-lactam antibiotic resistance [22].

In this study, we explored whether D0Y85_RS06240 from Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 mediates antibiotic resistance. Recombinant heterologous expression strains expressing D0Y85_RS06240 from either its native promoter (strain DR06240) or an E. coli promoter (strain DP06240) were constructed using E. coli. The MICs of colistin, tetracycline, and cefixime were higher in DR06240 and DP06240 than in the control strain DH5α (18T), while the florfenicol, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and kanamycin MICs were the same in DR06240, DP06240, and DH5α (18T), indicating that heterologous expression of D0Y85_RS06240 only mediated resistance to colistin, tetracycline, and cefixime. Moreover, the antibiotic MICs of DP06240 were notably higher than those of DR06240, indicating that the expression level of the D0Y85_RS06240 gene might be higher in DP06240 than in DR06240. The transcription of the D0Y85_RS06240 gene in DP06240 is controlled by a constitutive E. coli promoter, which may result in higher expression of D0Y85_RS06240 and therefore, higher resistance of DP06240 to antibiotics, suggesting that increased expression of D0Y85_RS06240 could enhance bacterial resistance to antibiotics. The differences in gene expression may be related to where genes are located in the microenvironment of the host bacteria, or to the promoter [23, 24], with the combination of the E. coli host promoter and an E. coli strain enabling enhanced expression of D0Y85_RS06240.

MIC data showed that the proton pump inhibitors VER, RES, and CCCP had no effect on the antibiotic MICs of strain DP06240, suggesting that D0Y85_RS06240 is not a proton-driven efflux pump. NMP, a known efflux pump inhibitor, has been shown to reverse multidrug resistance in E. coli overexpressing efflux pumps [25], and we found that NMP markedly reduced the MICs of colistin, cefixime, and tetracycline for E. coli DP06240, meanwhile the growth of strain DP06240 was not affected when the tested concentration of 8 mg/L NMP was added alone, indicating that NMP was able to inhibit the function of D0Y85_RS06240 and further suggesting that the cell envelope integrity protein D0Y85_RS06240 may function as an efflux pump. In addition, the more rapid bactericidal action of the tetracycline/NMP combination provides impetus for screening for novel D0Y85_RS06240 inhibitors and for using D0Y85_RS06240 as a target to treat antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

5. Conclusion

Gene annotation and homologous protein alignment identified D0Y85_RS06240 of the Stenotrophomonas sp. G4 strain as a cell envelope integrity protein. MIC assays showed that heterologous expression of D0Y85_RS06240 conferred host resistance to colistin, cefixime, and tetracycline, and that the efflux pump inhibitor NMP could reduce the antibiotic MICs of the host strains. Additionally, a bacterial killing kinetics assay revealed that NMP could enhance the bactericidal rate of tetracycline on drug-resistant bacteria, suggesting that inhibition of D0Y85_RS06240 can be enhanced with concomitant treatment of strain DP06240 by tetracycline and NMP. Molecular docking analysis further showed that D0Y85_RS06240 can bind to colistin, tetracycline, and cefixime, consistent with the ability of D0Y85_RS06240 to confer resistance to these three antibiotics. Our findings lay the foundation for the in-depth analysis of the resistance mechanism of the membrane integrin protein D0Y85_RS06240 and the potential for using D0Y85_RS06240 as a target for the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections.

Data Availability

No underlying data were collected or produced in this study.

Additional Points

Highlights. (1) Stenotrophomonas D0Y85_RS06240 is related to cell envelope integrity proteins. (2) D0Y85_RS06240 mediates multiantibiotic resistance. (3) D0Y85_RS06240 is inhibited by efflux pump inhibitor. (4) D0Y85_RS06240 binds to colistin, tetracycline, and cefixime.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Chuanqing Zhong conceptualized the study and wrote the original draft. Xiaoqiang Deng and Yayu Liu proposed the methodology and investigated the study. Aihua Jiang provided the resources. Jiafang Fu used the software and validated the study. Yuanyuan Liu curated the data. Guangxiang Cao reviewed and edited the article and supervised the study. All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (nos. ZR2021MD025 and ZR2022MH107). We thank Dr. Susan T. Howard for proofreading the manuscript and for fruitful discussions.

References

S. C. Davies, T. Fowler, J. Watson, D. M. Livermore, and D. Walker, “Annual report of the chief medical officer: infection and the rise of antimicrobial resistance,” The Lancet, vol. 381, no. 9878, pp. 1606–1609, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Morrison and T. R. Zembower, “Antimicrobial resistance,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 619–635, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Munita and C. A. Arias, Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance, Microbiol Spectr, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2016.
S. B. Lassen, M. E. Ahsan, S. R. Islam et al., “Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in Pangasianodon hypophthalmus and Oreochromis niloticus aquaculture production systems in Bangladesh,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 813, Article ID 151915, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Bloomer and M. McKee, “Policy options for reducing antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant genes in the environment,” Journal of Public Health Policy, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 389–406, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dong, Y. Chen, J. Wang et al., “Interactions of microplastics and antibiotic resistance genes and their effects on the aquaculture environments,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 403, Article ID 123961, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gao, D. Mao, Y. Luo, L. Wang, B. Xu, and L. Xu, “Occurrence of sulfonamide and tetracycline-resistant bacteria and resistance genes in aquaculture environment,” Water Research, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2355–2364, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Wuethrich, B. W Pelzer, Y. Khodamoradi, and M. J. G. T. Vehreschild, “The role of the human gut microbiota in colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria,” Gut Microbes, vol. 13, pp. 1–13, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Blair, G. E. Richmond, and L. J. Piddock, “Multidrug efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria and their role in antibiotic resistance,” Future Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1165–1177, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Mascio, D. J. White, and L. S. Tisa, “Construction and purification of His-tagged staphylococcal ArsB protein, an integral membrane protein that is involved in arsenical salt resistance,” Indian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 212–218, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Scarsbrook, R. Urban, B. R. Streather, A. Moores, and C. Mulligan, “Topological analysis of a bacterial DedA protein associated with alkaline tolerance and antimicrobial resistance,” Microbiology (Reading), vol. 167, no. 12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Brooke, “Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 2–41, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Li, S. Liu, J. Fu et al., “Co-occurrence of colistin and meropenem resistance determinants in a Stenotrophomonas strain isolated from sewage water,” Microbial Drug Resistance, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 317–325, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Clsi, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, CLSI, Dubai, UAE, 27th edition, 2017.
A. Lamut, L. Peterlin Masic, D. Kikelj, and T. Tomasic, “Efflux pump inhibitors of clinically relevant multidrug resistant bacteria,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 2460–2504, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, J. Hong, X. Liu et al., “Snake cathelicidin from Bungarus fasciatus is a potent peptide antibiotics,” PLoS One, vol. 3, no. 9, Article ID 3217, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wei, J. Gao, S. Zhang et al., “Identification and characterization of the first cathelicidin from sea snakes with potent antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity and special mechanism,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 27, pp. 16633–16652, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Brettin, J. J. Davis, T. Disz et al., “RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 8365, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Hung and Z. Weng, “Sequence alignment and homology search with BLAST and ClustalW,” Cold Spring Harbour Protocols, vol. 2016, no. 11, Article ID 93088, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Biovia, Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, Dassault Systemes, San Diego, CA, USA, 2017.
B. Moya, A. Dotsch, C. Juan et al., “β-Lactam resistance response triggered by inactivation of a nonessential penicillin-binding protein,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 3, Article ID 1000353, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Huang, Y. T. Lin, W. C. Chen, Y. W. Huang, S. J. Chen, and T. C. Yang, “Expression and functions of CreD, an inner membrane protein in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 12, Article ID 145009, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Y. Hong and B. A. Cohen, “Genomic environments scale the activities of diverse core promoters,” Genome Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 85–96, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Fan, W. Song, Z. Guan, W. Zhang, and X. Lu, “Some novel features of strong promoters discovered in Cytophaga hutchinsonii,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 2529–2540, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. V. Kern, P. Steinke, A. Schumacher, S. Schuster, H. V. Baum, and J. A. Bohnert, “Effect of 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine, a novel putative efflux pump inhibitor, on antimicrobial drug susceptibility in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 339–343, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Chuanqing Zhong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

114

Downloads

150

Citations