Methicillin-Resistant and Biofilm-Producing <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in Nasal Carriage among Health Care Workers and Medical Students

Saud, Bhuvan; Khatri, Gita; Amatya, Neetu; Paudel, Govinda; Shrestha, Vikram

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8424486

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 8424486 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8424486

Methicillin-Resistant and Biofilm-Producing Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Carriage among Health Care Workers and Medical Students

Bhuvan Saud,¹Gita Khatri,¹Neetu Amatya,¹Govinda Paudel,¹and Vikram Shrestha¹

Academic Editor: Gabriele Messina

Received05 Jul 2022

Revised29 Oct 2022

Accepted02 Nov 2022

Published04 Jan 2023

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat. It has been portrayed as a slow tsunami. Multidrug resistance and extensive drug resistance exacerbate the already-existing AMR problem. The aim of the study was to access the colonization of methicillin-resistant and biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers (HCWs) and medical students (MSs). A cross-sectional study was designed. A total of 352 participants (176 were HCWs and 176 were MSs) were enrolled from different hospitals and medical colleges in Kathmandu, Nepal. Nasal cavity swab samples were collected and inoculated on Mannitol salt agar at standard in-vitro environmental conditions. Isolates were identified based on colony characteristics, staining properties, and biochemical tests. Identified isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm production. Out of 352 participants, 65.3% were S. aureus carriers; among the carriers, 52.2% were HCWs and 47.8% were MSs. Of the total isolates, 47.4% isolates were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 73.9% isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Among MDR isolates, out of 109 MRSA isolates, 86.2% were MDR and out of 121 MSSA isolates, 62.8% were MDR where isolates were mainly resistant to erythromycin. In addition, 68.7% isolates were biofilm-forming; the results were similar in both MRSA and MSSA. Variables such as profession and educational level showed statistical significance ( < 0.05) with MRSA, MSSA, and biofilm producers. In conclusion, asymptomatic colonization of healthcare workers by drug-resistant S. aureus is increasing at alarming rates. This reflects the lack of proper hygiene practice as well as improper disinfection of workplace of study population.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a microbiota of human body; however, it can cause mild to fatal infections. Globally, around 30.0% and 50.0% of people carry S. aureus in their nasal cavities permanently [1, 2]. In the early 1960s, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was first reported in England [3], which is now ubiquitous all around the world. MRSA is a group of Gram-positive bacteria that genetically differ from other strains of S. aureus that cause an infection which does not respond to common antibiotics, including methicillin, amoxicillin, and penicillin [4]. Methicillin resistance is mediated by acquiring mecA gene on S. aureus chromosomal DNA which confers resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Worldwide, the prevalence of MRSA varies from 13.0% to 74.0% [5], while in the South-East Asian and Western Pacific areas, prevalence varied from 2.0% to 69.0% [6]. In Nepal, MRSA distribution ranges from 46.0% to 57.8% [7–10]. S. aureus has an ability to form biofilm, that acts in defense mechanism, enhances virulence properties, and is also associated with several infections such as bacteremia, sepsis, and endocarditis [11]. More than 14 adhesion genes are involved in bacterial cellular aggregation and accumulation [12]. It was reported that biofilm-forming Staphylococci can resist antibiotic concentration 10–10,000 times higher than the free-floating ones [13]. Also, studies in Nepal elucidated that prevalence of biofilm producing S. aureus range from 69.8% to 100.0% [8, 14].

Nasal cavity is one of the ecological niches for S. aureus. Host characteristics and environmental factors can predispose to colonization of bacteria, even though majority of hosts remain asymptomatic carriers. Hospital environment, gowns, patients’ care items, etc., contribute prominently to the pathogen transmission in healthcare setting. A study from England concluded that 58.0% healthcare workers (Healthcare worker: According to The Public Health Service Act 2018, a healthcare worker is defined as anyone who registered in the concerned council as a healthcare worker under the prevailing law of Nepal) (HCWs) detected S. aureus carrier in nasal cavity [15]. In a hospital setting, HCWs and medical students (Medical student: a medical student is a person who is enrolled in an educational institution to pursue a medical education degree). MSs act as an asymptomatic carrier of the pathogen and transmit infection in community and hospital settings. Regular screening of methicillin-resistant and biofilm-producing S. aureus in HCWs and MSs could minimize the potential outbreak of the pathogen. Hitherto, in case of Nepal, limited studies have been conducted to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant and biofilm-producing S. aureus among HCWs and MSs. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the asymptomatic colonization of methicillin-resistant and biofilm-producing S. aureus among HCWs and MSs in Kathmandu, Nepal.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Study Area, and Sampling

A cross-sectional study was conducted between January, 2022, and June, 2022, in Kathmandu. Samples were recruited by a stratified-random sampling technique. A total of 352 volunteer healthcare personnel (176 HCWs and 176 MSs) were enrolled. The sample size was calculated using the formula n = Z2α/2qN/e2 (N − 1) + Z2α/2q, where α/2 = level of significance at 95% confidence interval (or 5% level of significance) and Zα/2 = 1.96. = proportion/prevalence of S. aureus was 35.3% [16], thus = 0.5, q = 0.5, N = total population size of the study area, and e = maximum allowance error which is assumed at 0.05. Nasal swab samples were collected from participants and a face-to-face interview was performed for sociodemographic characterization. Samples were processed and examined in the Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Janamaitri Foundation Institute of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.

2.2. Bacterial Isolation and Characterization

Swab samples were inoculated onto Mannitol salt agar and Nutrient Agar incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. S. aureus colonies were identified based on their Gram’s staining properties, colony characteristics, and biochemical tests (catalase, coagulase, oxidase, and deoxyribonuclease tests).

2.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test

Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed in Muller–Hinton agar via the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method adopting Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [17]. Commercially available following antibiotic discs were used: amoxicillin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), cotrimoxazole (1.25 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), and tetracycline (30 μg). Cefoxitin (30 μg) inhibitory zone diameter ≤ 21 mm around the disc was interpreted as an MRSA strain. S. aureus ATCC 25923 control strain was used for quality control.

2.4. Screening of Biofilm Production

The tissue culture plate method was employed for detection of biofilm-producing S. aureus and a quantitative test was performed as published elsewhere [14, 18].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were entered and analyzed in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM Corp., USA) version 21. Chi-square test was performed for categorical data and value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics, Prevalence of S. aureus, and Association with MRSA and MSSA

An equal number of HCWs and MSs (176 in each) were engaged, where females (82.1%) were higher than the male (17.9%) participants and mean age was 27.6 years. The detailed demographic distributions and clinical traits are presented in Table 1. Out of 352 participants, 230 (65.3%) were positive for S. aureus carriage. In HCWs and MSs, S. aureus was isolated in 120 (52.2%) and 110 (47.8%) participants, respectively. The rate of nasal carriage was higher in female (83.0%) than the male (16.9%) participants. Out of 230 bacterial isolates, 109 (47.4%) were found to be MRSA while MSSA were 121 (52.6%). Furthermore, 38 (34.9%) MRSA and 38 (31.4%) MSSA isolates exhibited strong biofilm-forming potency whereas 17 (15.6%) of MRSA and 20 (16.5%) of MSSA showed a moderate level of biofilm production. All biofilm producers MRSA and MSSA were highly resistant to erythromycin whilst strong biofilm-forming MRSA was also equally resistant to amoxicillin. However, there was no significant relation with the level of biofilm producers MRSA and MSSA with antibiotic resistance.

3.2. Multidrug Resistance Pattern

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is defined as acquired nonsusceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [19]. A total of 230 S. aureus were isolated in which 170 (73.9%) isolates were MDR. Out of which, the maximum number of bacteria was resistant to two and three classes of antibiotics (n = 65 in both cases) while resistance to four drugs was seen in 24 isolates, resistance to five was seen in 14 isolates, and resistance to six was seen in 2 isolates. Likewise, among 121 MSSA isolated, 76 (62.8%) were MDR where 26 showed resistance to three different classes of antibiotics, 6 showed resistance to four classes of antibiotics, and 4 showed resistance to five drugs in varying patterns. Additionally, it was found that out of 109 MRSA, 94 (86.2%) were MDR of which 39 isolates displayed resistance to three classes of antibiotics, 18 displayed resistance to four classes of antibiotics, and 10 displayed resistance to five classes drugs and 2 to six classes.

3.3. Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in MRSA and MSSA

Most of the isolates were resistant to erythromycin in both MRSA (82.5%) and MSSA (68.6%). Meanwhile, second-highest resistance was seen for amoxicillin in MRSA (73.4%) isolates and cotrimoxazole in MSSA (45.5%) as shown in Table 2. However, the correlation was statistically insignificant ( value > 0.05).

3.4. Biofilm-ProducingS. aureus

Out of 230 isolates, 72 (31.3%) were nonbiofilm-producingS. aureus and 158 (68.7%) were biofilm-producingS. aureus. Out of total biofilm producers, MSSA (50.6%) produced biofilms almost equally to their MRSA (49.4%) counterpart. An equal number of isolates were strong biofilm producers in both MSSA and MRSA. In the moderate biofilm producer category, the number of MSSA isolates was higher than MRSA and in the weak biofilm producer group, MRSA isolates were higher than MSSA. There was, however, no significant relation ( = 0.794) observed. Details are shown in Table 3.

4. Discussion

The nasal carriage rate of S. aureus among the participants was 65.3%, which is higher than that reported in studies from elsewhere in Nepal; 14.7%–15.7% [20, 21]. Similarly, the prevalence of MRSA (47.4%) was higher than that in studies published from different settings of Nepal; 2.3%–41.3% [16, 22–25]. A meta-analysis study, between 2008 and 2020 in Nepal, noted that prevalence of MRSA ranged from 14.6% to 70.6% [26]. However, other studies from Nepal and Kenya have found a higher MRSA prevalence rate of 57.0% [11] and 53.4% [27] than ours. In this study, the high prevalence of MRSA could be because participants were healthcare personnel. Also, studies have found that Methicillin-resistantCoagulase Negative Staphylococci (MR-CoNS) acts a potential reservoir of mecA gene that facilitates MRSA colonization in human via horizontal crosspropagation of resistant genes when co-colonized resulting high prepondance of MRSA in nasal mucosa [28, 29]. In addition, sufficient practices related to infection control and preventive measures, extensive and excessive antibiotic usage, and low socioeconomic status increase the chance of MRSA carriage.

In this study, 73.9% isolates were MDR and mainly resistant to erythromycin followed by amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole. Out of 109 MRSA isolates, 94 (86.2%) were MDR. A similar study has noted that all the MRSA isolates were MDR [23]. Furthermore, biofilm producer S. aureus is two folds higher in number than the nonbiofilm producers. However, biofilm producers were nearly equal in numbers in both MRSA and MSSA. On the contrary, a report from Poland has found that MRSA isolates have a higher ability to produce biofilms than MSSA [30]. Biofilms provide a protective barrier against the host defense, disinfectants, and antibiotics. It has been noted that incidence of methicillin resistance was nearly two folds higher in biofilm producers than the nonproducers [20]. Several other human pathogenic bacteria such as S. epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Viridans streptococci, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa produce biofilms [31]. Biofilm-producing bacteria are accountable for increased pathogenicity, long hospital stay, treatment failure with current antibiotic drugs, economic crisis [32], and may even contribute cancer development [33]. In our study, biofilm-producingS. aureus was mainly resistance to erythromycin and amoxicillin. Other studies noted that S. aureus isolates were mostly resistant to penicillin and erythromycin [34].

HCWs and MSs frequently encounter potentially lethal microorganism from patients and hospital environments. Therefore, they may transmit the disease to another person in hospital and community. A study revealed that the prevalence of MRSA is higher mainly in doctors and nurses [16]. In our study, there was a significant relation to the education level and profession with MRSA colonization. A similar study evidenced that the education level was significantly associated with the colonization of MRSA [35]. A study from Ethiopia reported that nasal carriage of MRSA was significantly associated with exposure time in hospital, sharing of clothing and sports equipment, and nose picking habit [36]. However, no significant relation to risk factors such as gender, age, occupation, experience, nasal irritation, and history of upper respiratory tract infection with MRSA colonization was recorded from Nepal [16].

Colonization of methicillin-resistant and biofilm-producing S. aureus could cause fatal infection in immunosuppressive clinical conditions. Asymptomatic colonization of the bacteria in HCWs and MSs could transmit the infection to hospitalized patients. S. aureus easily spreads through touching with contaminated hands. Periodic screening, decolonization, and adequate awareness among health professionals about the nasal carriages could minimize the risk of spread. Screening is also important in area where there is lack of sophisticated healthcare system, poor hygiene practice, and inadequate awareness.

Some constraints of this study are that the targeted population were all health professional which might have caused selection bias for high prevalence of MRSA. Also, this study has not examined co-colonization of MR-CoNS and MRSA as some studies have suggested that MR-CoNS are the repository for mecA gene and enhances MRSA colonization [28, 29]. Furthermore, the identification of MRSA and biofilm detection were performed using conventional methods due to the lack of molecular laboratory.

5. Conclusion

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant, biofilm-producing, and multidrug-resistant S. aureus high among HCWs and MSs. Both the methicillin-resistant and biofilm producers are resistant to multiple antibiotics than nonmethicillin-resistant and nonbiofilm producers. Hygiene among healthcare professionals should be highly emphasized in infection control and prevention strategies. The high prevalence of MRSA underscores the necessity for an effective surveillance system in Nepal.

Abbreviation

S. aureus:	Staphylococcus aureus
HCWs:	Healthcare workers
MSs:	Medical students
MDR:	Multidrug-resistant
MRSA:	Methicillin-resistantS. aureus
MSSA:	Methicillin-sensitiveS. aureus
MR-CoNS:	Methicillin-resistant coagulase negative S. aureus
N:	Number.

Data Availability

The data used to support the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request to authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Bhuvan Saud designed the study. Gita Khatri, Bhuvan Saud, and Neetu Amatya carried out data collection, laboratory work, and data analysis. Bhuvan Saud and Neetu Amatya prepared the manuscript and carried out statistical analysis. Govinda Paudel and Vikram Shrestha made critical comment on the manuscript. All the authors finalized and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks Saroj Adhikari, Senior Med. Laboratory Technologist, ILO Fellow, for his invaluable support.

References

Staphylococcus aureus in Healthcare Settings, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. USA, 2022.
S. González-García, A. Hamdan-Partida, A. Bustos-Hamdan, and J. Bustos-Martínez, “Factors of Nasopharynx that Favor the Colonization and Persistence of Staphylococcus aureus,” Pharynx-Diagnosis and Treatment, IntechOpen, London, UK, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
MP. Jevons, “Celbenin” -resistant staphylococci,” Br Med J, vol. 1, pp. 124–5, 1961.
View at: Google Scholar
NIH, “National Cancer Institute, MRSA,” 2022, https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/mrsa.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Fishovitz, J. A. Hermoso, M. Chang, and S. Mobashery, “Penicillin-binding protein 2a of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus,” IUBMB Life, vol. 66, no. 8, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Köck, K. Becker, B. Cookson et al., “Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA): burden of disease and control challenges in Europe,” Euro Surveillance, vol. 15, no. 41, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Hassoun, P. K. Linden, and B. Friedman, “Incidence, prevalence, and management of MRSA bacteremia across patient populations-a review of recent developments in MRSA management and treatment,” Critical Care, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Kandel, N. Adhikari, B. Dhungel et al., “Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical specimens in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal,” Microbiology Insights, vol. 13, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Gaire, U. T. Shrestha, S. Adhikari et al., “Antibiotic susceptibility, biofilm production, and detection of mecA gene among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different clinical specimens,” Diseases, vol. 9, no. 4, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Adhikari, B. Kshetri, K. N. Sharma et al., “Prevalence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples at narayani samudayik hospital, chitwan, Nepal,” Tribhuvan Univ J Microbiol, vol. 7, pp. 37–42, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Pradhan, P. Rajbhandari, S. B. Nagaraja et al., “Prevalence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in a tertiary hospital in Nepal,” Public Health In Action, vol. 11, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Idrees, S. Sawant, N. Karodia, and A. Rahman, “Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: morphology, genetics, pathogenesis and treatment strategies,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 14, p. 7602, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Tang, J. Chen, H. Li, P. Zeng, and J. Li, “Characterization of adhesin genes, staphylococcal nuclease, hemolysis, and biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different sources,” Foodbourne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 757–763, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. A. Halim, N. N. Kassem, and B. S. Mahmoud, “Detection of biofilm producing staphylococci among different clinical isolates and its relation to methicillin susceptibility. Open,” Access Maced J Med Sci, vol. 6, no. 8, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Neopane, H. P. Nepal, R. Shrestha, O. Uehara, and Y. Abiko, “In vitro biofilm formation by <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> isolated from wounds of hospital-admitted patients and their association with antimicrobial resistance,” International Journal of General Medicine, vol. 11, pp. 25–32, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Price, K. Cole, A. Bexley et al., “Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus between health-care workers, the environment, and patients in an intensive care unit: a longitudinal cohort study based on whole-genome sequencing,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 207, 2017 Feb 1.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Giri, S. Maharjan, T. B. Thapa et al., “Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal,” The Internet Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2021, Article ID 8825746, 8 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Dolinsky, R. K. Ohiro, W. Fan, C. Xiao, and F. Wu, “Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Document M100–S10,” Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 19, no. 24, p. 18, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. P. Magiorakos, A. Srinivasan, R. B. Carey et al., “Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance,” Clinical Microbiology and Infections, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 268–281, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. P. Rijal, N. Giri, S. Maharjan, O. Shrestha, T. B. Thapa, and N. Shrestha, “Nasal carriage of biofilm producing methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 101, p. 279, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Khanal, P. Sah, P. Lamichhane, A. Lamsal, S. Upadhaya, and V. K. Pahwa, “Nasal carriage of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among health care workers at a tertiary care hospital in Western Nepal,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 39, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Khatri, N. D. Pant, R. Bhandari et al., “Nasal carriage rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among health care workers at a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu,” Nepal. J Nepal Health Res Counc, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–30, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Shah, B. Dhungel, A. Bastola, M. Raj Banjara, K. Raj Rijal, and P. Ghimire, “Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in health care workers of a tertiary care infectious disease hospital in Nepal,” Tribhuvan Univ J Microbiol, vol. 7, pp. 19–30, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Shrestha, B. M. Pokhrel, and T. M. Mohapatra, “Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among health care workers in a Nepal hospital,” Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 310–315, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Rai, R. Amatya, and S. K. Rai, “Hand and nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and its rate of recolonization among healthcare workers of a tertiary care hospital in Nepal,” JAC-Antimicrobial Resist, vol. 4, no. 3, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khanal, G. C. S, A. Gaire et al., “Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in Nepal: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 103, pp. 48–55, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. K. Wangai, M. M. Masika, M. C. Maritim, and R. A. Seaton, “Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in east africa: red alert or red herring?” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 19, pp. 1–10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Lin, L. Li et al., “Methicillin-resistantcoagulase-negative staphylococci carriage is a protective factor of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in HIV-infected patients: a cross-sectional study,” The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, vol. 2021, Article ID 5717413, 8 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Khanal, P. R. Joshi, S. Paudel et al., “Methicillin-resistant coagulase negative staphylococci and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern from healthy dogs and their owners from Kathmandu valley,” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 194, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Piechota, B. Kot, A. Frankowska-Maciejewska, A. Gruzewska, and A. Woźniak-Kosek, “Biofilm Formation by methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitiveStaphylococcus aureus strains from hospitalized patients in Poland,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 4657396, 7 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Khatoon, C. D. McTiernan, E. J. Suuronen, T. F. Mah, and E. I. Alarcon, “Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention,” Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Rather, K. Gupta, P. Bardhan et al., “Microbial biofilm: a matter of grave concern for human health and food industry,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 380–395, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
L. K. Vestby, T. Grønseth, R. Simm, and L. L. Nesse, “Bacterial biofilm and its role in the pathogenesis of disease,” Antibiotics, vol. 9, no. 2, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Belbase, N. D. Pant, K. Nepal et al., “Antibiotic resistance and biofilm production among the strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 15, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Maroof, R. Nasir, N. Bali, A. Farhana, M. Amin, and F. Kanth, “Staphylococcus aureus: nasal-carriage in health care workers and in-patients with special reference to MRSA,” British Microbiology Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Mekuriya, A. Manilal, A. Aklilu, M. Woldemariam, T. Hailu, and B. Wasihun, “Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus colonization among medicine and health science students, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Bhuvan Saud et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

962

Downloads

625

Citations