Research Article

Effect of Rising Temperature on Lyme Disease: Ixodes scapularis Population Dynamics and Borrelia burgdorferi Transmission and Prevalence

Table 1

Default parameters used in model.

ParameterMeaningValueSource

Increase in mean annual temperature relative to historical0- to 5-degree CelsiusArbitrary
bPer capita egg production per day300[5, 6]
deDaily death rate for eggs0.015[43]
d1Daily death rate of young hardening larvae0.01[44]
dn1, dA1Daily death rate of engorged larvae and engorged nymphs0.001[45]
d2, dn2, dA2Daily death rate of questing larvae, nymphs, and adults0.094[44]
d3a = dfna = dA3aDaily death rate of feeding larva, nymphs, and adults on host type a (IM)0.51[39]
d3b = dfnb = dA3bDaily death rate of feeding larva, nymphs, and adults on host type b (IS)0.89[39]
d3c = dfnc = dA3c = d3e = dfne = dA3eDaily death rate of feeding larva, nymphs, and adults on host types c and e (CUM, CIM)0.73[39]
d3d = dfnd = dA3d = d3f = dfnf = dA3fDaily death rate of feeding larva, nymphs, and adults on host types c and e (CUS, CIS)0.72[39]
dA4Daily death rate of engorged adults0.5[5, 6]
me(T)Egg to larvae maturation rate[6]
m1Young hardening larvae to questing larvae maturation rate0.033[43]
m2, mn2, mA2Questing tick to feeding tick maturation (all stages)0.5Estimated questing period of 5–6 days
m3, mfn, mA3Feeding tick maturation rate, all stages, all hosts0.5[46]
mn1(T)Engorged larvae maturation rate[6]
mA1(T)Engorged nymph maturation rate[6]
rA numerical feature to ensure you never divide by 00.001
Probability of larvae infection0.1Estimated
Probability of nymph infection0.1Estimated
CaPer host tick carrying capacity of host type a, incompetent mobile239[39]
CbPer host tick carrying capacity of incompetent stationary hosts176.75[39]
Cc = CePer host tick carrying capacity of CUM and CIM hosts11.4[39]
Cd = CfPer host tick carrying capacity of CUS and CIS hosts46.84[39]
bIMBirth rate of incompetent mobile hosts0.00261[39, 40, 47]
bISBirth rate of incompetent stationary hosts0.0102[39, 40, 47]
bCUMBirth rate of competent uninfected mobile hosts0.00753[39, 40, 48]
bCUSBirth rate of competent uninfected stationary host0.0176[39, 40, 47]
dIMDeath rate of IM hosts0.000609[39, 40, 47]
dISDeath rate of IS hosts0.00129[39, 40, 47]
dCUM = dCIMDeath rate of competent uninfected mobile hosts0.00157[39, 40, 48]
dCUS = dCISDeath rate of competent uninfected stationary hosts0.00345[39, 40, 47]
KIMCell carrying capacity of IM host25[39]
KISCell carrying capacity of IS hosts45[39]
KCMCell carrying capacity of CUM + CIS hosts3100[39]
KCSCell carrying capacity of CUS + CIS hosts9,335[39]
Probability of CUM host infection (per infective tick per day × number of hosts of that type)0.117[39]
Probability of competent uninfected stationary host infection (per infective tick per day × number of hosts of that type)0.6635[39]
E(0)Initial number of eggs10,000,000
NU1(0)Initial uninfected engorged larvae5,000,000
AU1(0)Initial uninfected engorged nymphs300,000
IM(0)Initial incompetent mobile hosts25
IS(0)Initial incompetent stationary hosts45
CUM(0)Initial competent mobile hosts3,100
CUS(0)Initial competent stationary hosts9,335
All other initial conditions0