Resilience Significantly Contributes to Exceptional Longevity

Table 4

Estimates of odds ratios of higher simplified resilience scores (SRS) based on logistic regression.

Dependent variable: higher resilience score	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4	Model 5
	Total sample	Total sample	Total sample	Men	Women
Age group
Age 80–89; (ages 65–79)	0.597^∗∗∗  [0.027]	0.740^∗∗∗  [0.036]	0.941  [0.047]	0.837^∗∗  [0.059]	1.047  [0.076]
Age 90–99; (ages 65–79)	0.443^∗∗∗  [0.020]	0.633^∗∗∗  [0.032]	1.109^∗  [0.062]	0.932  [0.076]	1.276^∗∗∗  [0.099]
Age 100+; (ages 65–79)	0.303^∗∗∗  [0.015]	0.526^∗∗∗  [0.030]	1.261^∗∗∗  [0.083]	1.412^∗∗∗  [0.162]	1.294^∗∗∗  [0.110]
Demographic; characteristics
Male (Female)		1.341^∗∗∗  [0.053]	1.248^∗∗∗  [0.051]
Han (Minority)		0.957  [0.073]	0.985  [0.077]	1.15  [0.139]	0.894  [0.091]
Urban (Rural)		1.142^∗∗∗  [0.044]	1.176^∗∗∗  [0.046]	1.241^∗∗∗  [0.078]	1.118^∗∗  [0.057]
Married (Notmarried including widowed, divorced, and single)		1.523^∗∗∗  [0.066]	1.451^∗∗∗  [0.065]	1.480^∗∗∗  [0.088]	1.400^∗∗∗  [0.096]
Literate (Illiterate)		1.322^∗∗∗  [0.055]	1.206^∗∗∗  [0.052]	1.215^∗∗∗  [0.071]	1.215^∗∗∗  [0.079]
With pension (No pension)		1.529^∗∗∗  [0.080]	1.464^∗∗∗  [0.080]	1.649^∗∗∗  [0.120]	1.255^∗∗∗  [0.110]
Health status
ADL independent (Impaired)			2.145^∗∗∗  [0.106]	2.309^∗∗∗  [0.192]	2.100^∗∗∗  [0.131]
Normal cognition (Impaired)			2.584^∗∗∗  [0.108]	2.344^∗∗∗  [0.153]	2.792^∗∗∗  [0.153]
Whether the province dummy is controlled for	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Observations	16,428	16,428	16,428	6,941	9,487

Notes: (1) the categories in the parenthesis are reference groups. (2) Standard errors are indicated in the brackets ([]). (3) ^∗𝑃<.1; ^∗∗𝑃<.05; ^∗∗∗𝑃<.01.