Clinical Study

Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Table 3

Histomorphometric data expressed in percentage [%].

SamplesMissingMeanStd. dev.Std. errorCI of mean

Vital bone rate ABB2600,3850,1700,03330,0685
Vital bone rate NHA2600,3490,1550,03030,0625
Connective rate ABB2600,4350,2320,04560,0939
Connective rate NHA2600,4450,1810,03540,0729
Biomaterial rate ABB2600,2230,1280,02520,0518
Biomaterial rate NHA2600,2060,1350,02650,0546

RangeMax.Min.Median25%75%

Vital bone rate ABB0,8100,9240,1140,3790,2630,469
Vital bone rate NHA0,6610,6880,02700,3390,2790,465
Connective rate ABB0,9420,9900,04800,4620,2930,560
Connective rate NHA0,7090,7860,07700,4530,3080,562
Biomaterial rate ABB0,4420,4480,006000,2280,1380,310
Biomaterial rate NHA0,5240,5500,02600,1610,1300,309

SkewnessKurtosisK-S dist.K-S prob.SumSum of squares

Vital bone rate ABB1,2562,8460,1310,28810,0154,576
Vital bone rate NHA−0,143−0,05940,1260,3459,0793,768
Connective rate ABB0,3810,09770,09610,69811,3166,276
Connective rate NHA−0,132−0,3920,1020,62511,5705,964
Biomaterial rate ABB0,0123−0,7270,07580,8585,8001,706
Biomaterial rate NHA0,8400,2750,1520,1245,3501,558