BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 196565 | 8 pages |

Improvement of Physicochemical Characteristics of Monoepoxide Linoleic Acid Ring Opening for Biolubricant Base Oil

Academic Editor: Rumiana Koynova
Received13 Jun 2011
Revised21 Jul 2011
Accepted21 Jul 2011
Published10 Nov 2011


For environmental reasons, a new class of environmentally acceptable and renewable biolubricant based on vegetable oils is available. In this study, oxirane ring opening reaction of monoepoxide linoleic acid (MEOA) was done by nucleophilic addition of oleic acid (OA) with using p-toluene sulfonic acid (PTSA) as a catalyst for synthesis of 9(12)-hydroxy-10(13)-oleoxy-12(9)-octadecanoic acid (HYOOA) and the physicochemical properties of the resulted HYOOA are reported to be used as biolubricant base oils. Optimum conditions of the experiment using D-optimal design to obtain high yield% of HYOOA and lowest OOC% were predicted at OA/MEOA ratio of 0.30 : 1 (w/w), PTSA/MEOA ratio of 0.50 : 1 (w/w), reaction temperature at 110, and reaction time at 4.5 h. The results showed that an increase in the chain length of the midchain ester resulted in the decrease of pour point (PP) , increase of viscosity index (VI) up to 153, and improvement in oxidative stability (OT) to 180.94.

1. Introduction

The use of renewable biolubricant derivatives from vegetable oils and its fatty acids, to obtain industrial products, is of increasing importance [1]. The development of new biolubricant and environmentally benign pathways, which can lead to new value-added products, has still a high potential [2].

Vegetable-oils-based materials have inferior oxidation stability and low-temperature operability when compared to petroleum products. Chemical modification of the unsaturation fatty acids can provide products with improved oxidation stability and low-temperature properties. Examples from the studies, though certainly not exhaustive, include acylation, metathesis, hydroxylation, oxidative cleavage, carboxylation, and epoxidation [3].

A variety of chemical modifications of vegetable oils and fatty acids are possible, and one of the most commonly used is the oxirane ring opening reaction [4]. The epoxide can react with different nucleophiles to produce alcohols, diols, alkoxyalcohols, hydroxy esters, N-hydroxyalkylamides, mercaptoalcohols, aminoalcohols, and so forth [2]. Amongst these classes of products, hydroxy esters find application as biolubricants, polyurethane foams, or casting resins. The physicochemical properties of biolubricants derived from hydroxy esters can be modified using different carboxylic acids [3]. The oxirane ring opening takes place through cleavage the carbon oxygen bonds. It can be initiated by either electrophiles or nucleophiles, or catalyzed by either acids or bases. The acid catalyzed of an epoxide is a useful procedure for preparing hydroxy ester compounds [5].

In this study, report the oxirane ring opening reaction of monoepoxide linoleic acid (MEOA) by the nucleophilic addition of oleic acid (OA) in the presence of solid acid catalyst such as p-toluene sulfonic acid (PTSA) to prepare 9,12-hydroxy-10,13-oleioxy-12-octadecanoic acid (HYOOA). The effects of different ratio of OA/MEOA, different ratio of PTSA/MEOA, different reaction temperature, and different reaction time are analyzed in using D-optimal design. The experimental conditions and catalysts used were different from those previously used, leading to better selectivity towards the hydroxyl ester under mild working conditions. Other important issues like the physicochemical properties of the products are also reported here.

2. Methodology

2.1. Experimental Procedure

The oxirane ring opening reaction was carried out using oleic acid (OA) and -toluene sulfonic acid (PTSA) as catalyst to prepare 9,12-hydroxy-10,13-oleioxy-12-octadecanoic acid (HYOOA) [6]. Table 1 shows the different OA/MEOA ratio, different PTSA/MEOA ratio, different reaction temperature, and different reaction time using D-Optimal design. Factors (variables) such as ratio OA/MEOA (g/g, ), PTSA/MEOA (g/g, ), reaction temperature (°C, ), and reaction time (h) were performed under the same experimental conditions. MEOA (1.55 g) and ratio PTSA/MEOA (0.2 : 1–0.5 : 1 w/w) were dissolved in toluene (10 mL) in a 250-mL three-neck flask equipped with a cooler, dropping funnel, and thermometer. The mixture was kept at 50°C. OA/MEOA ratio (0.30 : 1–0.60 : 1 w/w) was added during 1.5 h in order to keep the reaction mixture temperature under 70–80°C. The reaction mixture was subsequently heated to different temperatures 90–110°C and refluxed at different times 3–6 h at this temperature range. After reaction termination, the heating was stopped and the mixture was left to stand overnight at ambient temperature. The mixture was washed with the water, the organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, and the solvent was removed using the vacuum evaporator. The oxirane ring content (OOC%), yield%, and iodine value (IV mg/g) were measured. The FTIR and 13C, 1H NMR were analysed, and the physicochemical properties of the product were studied.

Independent variablesVariable levels

(1) OA/MEOA (w/w) 0.300.450.60
(2) PTSA/MEOA (w/w) 0.20.350.5
(3) Temperature (°C) 90100110
(4) Time (h) 34.56

2.2. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis

To explore the effect of the operation variables on the response in the region of investigation, a D-optimal design was performed. Ratio of OA/MEOA (g/g, ), ratio of PTSA/MEOA (g/g, ), reaction temperature (°C, ), and reaction time (h) were selected as independent variables. The range of values and coded levels of the variables are given in Table 1. A polynomial equation was used to predict the response as a function of independent variables and their interactions. In this work, the number of independent variables is four, and, therefore, the response for the quadratic polynomials becomes where , and are constant, linear, square, and interaction regression coefficient terms, respectively, and and are independent variables. The Minitab software version 14 (Minitab Inc., USA) was used for multiple regression analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and analysis of ridge maximum of data in the response surface regression (RSREG) procedure. The goodness of fit of the model was evaluated by the coefficient of determination and its statistical significance that was checked by the F-test.

2.3. Physicochemical Characteristics

(a) FTIR
FTIR spectra were recorded neat on a Thermo Nicolet Nexus 470 FTIR system (Madison, Wis) with a Smart ARK accessory containing a 45 Ze Se trough in a scanning range of 650–4000 cm−1 for 32 scans at a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 [6].

(b) 13C and 1H NMR
13C and 1H NMR spectra were recorded using a JEOL JNM-ECP 400 spectrometer operating at a frequency of 400.13 and 100.77 MHz, respectively, using a 5-mm broadband inverse Z-gradient probe in DMSO-d6 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Andover, Mass) as solvent. Each spectrum was Fourier-transformed, phase-corrected, and integrated using MestRe-C 2.3a (Magnetic Resonance Companion, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) software [6].

(c) Pour Point
Pour point (PP) value was measured according to the ASTM D5949 method [6] using a phase Technology Analyzer, Model PSA-70S (Hammersmith Gate, Richmond, BC, Canada). For a greater degree of accuracy, PP measurements were done with a resolution of 1°C instead of the specified 3°C increment.

(d) Flash Point
Flash point (FP) determination was run according to the American National Standard Method using a Tag Closed Tester (ASTM D 56-79) [6].

(e) Viscosity Index
Viscosity index (VI) is an arbitrary measure for the change of kinematic viscosity with temperature. Automated multirange viscometer tubes HV M472 obtained from Walter Herzog (Germany) were used to measure viscosity. Measurements were run in a Temp-Trol (Precision Scientific, Chicago, Ill, USA) viscometer bath set at 40.0 and 100.0°C. The viscosity and viscosity index were calculated using ASTM method ASTM D 2270-93 [6].

(f) Oxidative Stability
Pressurized DSC (PDSC) experiments were accomplished using a DSC 2910 thermal analyzer from TA Instruments (Newcastle, Del) [6]. Typically, a 2-lL sample, resulting in a film thickness of <1 mm, was placed in an aluminum pan hermetically sealed with a pinhole lid and oxidized in the presence of dry air (Gateway Airgas, St. Louis, Mo), which was pressurized in the module at a constant pressure of 1378.95 kPa (200 psi). A 10°C min−1 heating rate from 50 to 350°C was used during each experiment. The oxidation onset (OT, °C) was calculated from a plot of heat flow (W/g) versus temperature for each experiment.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Process Parameters and Statistical Analysis

Many nucleophilic reagents are known to add to an oxirane ring, resulting in ring opening [6]. These ring opening reactions could result in branching at the oxirane ring opening (earlier sites of unsaturation in LA). The appropriate branching groups would interfere with the formation of macrocrystalline structures during low-temperature applications and would provide enhanced fluidity to vegetable oils. TAGs that are hydrogenated to eliminate polyunsaturation such as LA will solidify at room temperature. For this reason, it is important that there should be at least one unsaturation site available for a functionalization that will generate two branching points on the chain. The ester branching groups produce from oxirane ring opening base esterification reaction are effective for attaining the desired molecular spacing. A chain length ester (saturated and unsaturated) has been observed to deliver the most desired physicochemical properties for some oils [7]. These modified vegetable oils with chain branching are reported to have superior performance of the physicochemical properties and are promising as biolubricant [8].

The nucleophilic attack by fatty acid molecules such as oleic acid (OA) on the oxirane ring of MEOA in the presence of PTSA resulted in the ring-opened products 9,12-hydroxy-10,13-oleioxy-12-octadecanoic acid (HYOOA), as shown in Figure 1. In the first pathway mechanism, the acid reacts with the epoxide group to produce a protonated epoxide and finally alcohol compound form by nucleophilic substitution reaction. OA acts like nucleophiles during the acid-catalyzed epoxy ring opening reaction. This modification proposes that for one oxirane ring present in the MEOA, one ester and one hydroxyl functional groups will generate in the molecule.

Optimisation study of the oxirane ring-opening-based esterification reaction using D-optimal design took place in the presence of OA with using PTSA as a catalyst. The design is used to obtain 25 design points within the whole range of four factors for experiments. The designs and the response OOC% (Y) are given in Table 2 with measuring the yield% and IV mg/g for the lowest OOC% product. To see the impact on the oxirane ring opening by OA reaction, different ratio of OA/MEOA (g/g, ), different ratio of PTSA/MEOA (g/g, ), different reaction temperature (°C, ), and different reaction time (h) were evaluated Table 2.

RunCoded independent variable levelsResponse
NumberOAa/MEOAb (w/w, )PTSAc/MEOA (w/w, )Temperature (°C, )Time
( )
(%, )


Notes: oleic acid (a); 9(12)-10(13)-monoepoxy 12(9)-octadecanoic acid (b); p-toluene sulfonic acid (c); oxirane oxygen content (d).

Table 2 illustrates the OOC% effect related to the OA, PTSA, reaction temperature, and reaction time. As expected, at high temperature, 110°C, the OOC% shows a great reduction 0.05% compared with temperatures of 90 and 100°C. This abrupt reduction on OOC% percent by high temperature (110°C) shows a high increment on yield 84.61% and iodine value 134.82 mg/g compared with initial iodine value (IV°) 66.65 mg/g. In light of these changes, other experiments optimisations were discontinued. As described in the mechanism, most of the oxirane ring groups are opened and consequently were converted into ester bonds in the molecule with hydroxyl group. At lower temperatures, fairly low oxirane ring reduction (3.80%) was observed at 90°C for 4.5 h of reaction compared with 110°C for 4.5 h. At 100°C, the OOC% shows a smooth reduction during the reaction Table 2.

The quadratic regression coefficients obtained by employing a least squares method technique to predict quadratic polynomial models for the OOC% () of HYOOA are given in Table 3. The OOC% response of HYOOA () shows that the linear term of PTSA/MEOA ratio () and quadratic terms of PTSA/MEOA ratio () were significant (). The intercept of the reaction was highly significant ().

VariablesCoefficients ( ), OOC% (Y)TPNotability

Intercept1.635.190.0064 ***
−0.555.730.0378 **
−0.064 0.9325
Quadratic **
−0.017 0.9289

Notes: = OA/MEOA ratio; = PTSA/MEOA ratio; = reaction temperature; = reaction time, ** ; *** . T : F-test value. See Table 2 for a description of the abbreviations.

The lack of fit -value for all the responses showed that the lack of fit is not significant () relative to the pure error. This indicates that all the models predicted for the responses were adequate. Regression models for data on responses were significant () with satisfactory . However for was (0.87), although the model was significant. Table 4 summarizes the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of all the responses of this study.

SourceDfSum of squaresMean squareF valueP

Pure error25122.904.92

From the experimental design in Table 1, experimental results in Table 2 and (2) developed a second-order polynomial equation (in coded units) that could relate OOC% of HYOOA to the parameters study. The following quadratic model was explained in (2):

Significant interaction variables in the fitted models (Table 3) were chosen as the axes (OA/MEOA ratio; , PTSA/MEOA ratio; , reaction temperature; and reaction time; ) for the response surface plots. The relationships between independent and dependent variables are shown in the three-dimensional representation as response surfaces. In a contour plot, curves of equal response values are drawn on a plane whose coordinates represent the levels of the independent factors. Each contour represents a specific value for the height of the surface above the plane defined for combination of the levels of the factors. Therefore, different surface height values enable one to focus attention on the levels of the factors at which changes in the surface height occur [9].

Figure 2 are the Design-Expert plots for the response (). In the oxirane ring opening reaction of HYOOA, performing the technique using high ratio of PTSA/MEOA would give the desired OOC% of HYOOA. The relationships between the parameters and oxirane ring opening of HYOOA were linear or almost linear. Lowest OOC% could be obtained by using high ratio of PTSA/MEOA at high reaction temperature, otherwise; other literatures have used lower PTSA such as [6]. Experimental variables should be carefully controlled in order to reduce the OOC% of interest with reasonable yield%.

Optimum conditions of the experiment to obtain high yield% of HYOOA and lowest OOC% were predicted at ratio of OA/MEOA of 0.30 : 1 (w/w), ratio of PTSA/MEOA of 0.50 : 1 (w/w), reaction temperature 110°C, and 4.5 h of reaction time. At this condition, the OOC of HYOOA was 0.05%, yield was 84.61%, and IV was 134.82 mg/g. The observed value was reasonably close to the predicted value as shown in Figure 3.

3.2. FTIR Analysis of HYOOA

The spectrum from the FTIR analysis displays several absorption peaks as shown in Figure 4. The main peaks and their assignment to functional groups are given in Table 5. FTIR peaks of HYOOA indicated disappearance of absorption band at 820 cm−1 which belong to the oxirane ring, hence, appear in MEOA. For the ester carbonyl functional groups C=O of HYOOA at 1741 cm−1 and the carboxylic carbonyl vibration functional group at 1711 cm−1 which showed the same absorption band in MEOA at 1711 cm−1. FTIR peaks at 2925 to 2855 cm−1 indicated the CH2 and CH3 scissoring of MEOA and HYOOA.

Wavelength of MEOAaWavelength of HYOOAbFunctional group

3003OH stretching (alcohol)
30093003C=C bending vibration (aliphatic)
2927, 28562925, 2855C–H stretching vibration (aliphatic)
1737C=O stretching vibration (ester)
17111711C=O stretching vibration (carboxylic acid)
1461C–H scissoring and bending for methylene group
1176, 1117C–O stretching vibration (ester)
1279, 12621279C–O stretching asymmetric (carboxylic acid)
934934C–O bending vibration (carboxylic acid)
967967C–H bending vibration (alkene)
820C–O–C oxirane ring
723723C–H group vibration (aliphatic)

Notes: Monoepoxide linoleic acid (a); 9,12-Hydroxy-10,13-oleioxy-12,9-octadecanoic acid (b).

The FTIR spectroscopy analysis of MEOA and HYOOA indicated the presence of peak at 3003–3008 cm−1 which belongs to the double bond C=C (stretching aliphatic) while at 3413 cm−1 belong to OH stretching of HYOOA. The peaks at 1176 and 1117 cm−1 of HYOOA are referred to as (C–O) stretching ester. FTIR spectrum also showed absorption bands at 723 cm−1 for (C–H) group vibration. A similar observation has been reported for the FTIR spectrum of oxirane ring opening of epoxide oleic acid [6].

3.3. 13C and 1H NMR Analysis of HYOOA

(a) 13C NMR Analysis
Figures 5(a) and 5(b) indicate the 13C NMR spectrum of MEOA and HYOOA, respectively. The 13C spectroscopy shows the main signals assignment of MEOA and HYOOA as shown in Table 6. The signals at 179.32 and 178.11 ppm refer to the carbon atom of the carbonyl group (carboxylic acid) for MEOA and HYOOA, respectively, while 174.1 ppm has appeared in HYOOA which refers to ester group.
The signals at 127.90 to 130.57 ppm refer to the unsaturated carbon atoms (olefin carbons) for both MEOA and HYOOA. Figure 5(b) can be confirmed disappearance of oxirane ring which has appeared in MEOA at 54.59–57.29 and appearance OH alcohol in HYOOA at about 64.41 ppm. The other distinctive signals were aliphatic carbons HYOOA at about 25.76–34.38 ppm and are common for these types of compounds which belong to the methylene carbon atoms of MEOA and HYOOA [6].

δ (ppm) of MEOAaδ (ppm) of HYOOAbAssignment

22.69–34.1525.76–34.38Aliphatic carbons
54.59–57.29(1) Epoxide groups
64.41–OH alcohol
124.02–132.89127.90–130.57–CH=CH– olefinic carbons
174.01C=O ester
179.32178.11C=O carboxylic acid

Notes: monoepoxide linoleic acid (a); 9,12-Hydroxy-10,13-oleioxy-12,9-octadecanoic acid (b).

(b) 1H NMR Analysis
1H NMR spectroscopy shows the main signals assignments of MEOA and HYOOA as shown in Table 7. The 1H NMR spectra for the products HYOOA showed disappearance of the ring opening (–CH–O–CH–) in range of 2.92–3.12 ppm which referred to the MEOA Figure 6. The distinguishable peaks appeared in HYOOA–CH–OH at 3.62 ppm while –CHOCOR at 4.06 ppm which did not appeared in MEOA (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)).
The signals at 0.82–0.84 ppm referred to the methylene group (–CH3) of HYOOA which also appear in MEOA next to the terminal methyl (–CH2) at 1.23–2.06 ppm of HYOOA. The other distinctive signals were methine at about 2.26–2.33 ppm, which are common for these types of compounds [10]. However, the methane proton signals (–CH=CH–) was shifted upfield at about 5.31–5.40 ppm of HYOOA.

δ (ppm) of MEOAaδ (ppm) of HYOOAbAssignment


Notes: monoepoxide linoleic acid (a); 9,12-Hydroxy-10,13-oleioxy-12,9-octadecanoic acid (b).
3.4. Physicochemical Properties

Physicochemical properties of HYOOA compound are summarized in Table 8, an effective way to introduce branching on the fatty acid (FA) chain. The branched products have significantly improved the pour point (PP), flash point (FP), viscosity index (VI), and higher oxidative stability (OT) comparing with MEOA and another study such as [6].


Pour point (°C) −41 −51 −43
Flash point (°C)128251232
Viscosity index 130.8 153123
Oxidative stability, OT (°C)168180.9465

Notes: Monoepoxide linoleic acid (a); 9(12)-hydroxy-10(13)-oleioxy-12(9)-octadecanoic acid (b); 9-hydroxy-10-behenoxyoctadecanoic acid [6] (c).

This step of reaction is used to improve the low-temperature behavior (PP) of fatty acids by opening the oxirane ring by using OA. Oxirane ring opening of HYOOA improves the PP at −51°C significantly comparing with MEOA at −41°C and HYBODA at −43°C [6]. Attachment of OA to produce HYOOA was the most effective way to decrease the PP to −51 (Table 8). It can be assumed that the presence of a large branching point on the fatty acid ester creates a steric barrier around the individual molecules and inhibits crystallization, resulting in lower PP [11]. Table 8 has also shown the improvement in FP of HYOOA which increased to 251°C comparing with 128°C of MEOA and 232°C of HYBODA [6], in which the result agrees with the various international standards.

The best oils (with the highest VI) will not vary much in viscosity over such a temperature range and therefore will perform well throughout. In oxirane ring opening, increased viscosity index (VI) up to 153 of HYOOA larger than MEOA at 130.8 and HYBODA at 123 (Table 8), which, its result of their higher molar weight, and especially the altered structure of their molecules [11].

The OT is the temperature at which a rapid increase in the rate of oxidation is observed at a constant, high pressure (200 psi). A high OT would suggest high oxidation stability of the material. OT was calculated from a plot of heat flow (W/g) versus temperature that was generated by the sample upon degradation and by definition. In this study, using OA for oxirane ring opening of HYOOA significantly improves the oxidation stability of OT for HYOOA at 180.94°C (Figure 7) among others studies such as the OT 65°C for the HYBODA [6] (Table 8). The results agree with other studies on synthetic esters, and the OT increased with increasing acyl chain length of the esterified FA [12]. High OT would suggest a high oxidation stability of HYOOA.

4. Conclusion

The oxirane ring opening of monoepoxide linoleic acid was done by nucleophilic addition of OA. PTSA shows a high catalytic reactivity that promotes the ring opening reaction and yields a minimum oxirane oxygen content (OOC%). Overall, physical properties of HYOOA have shown potential in formulation of industrial fluids for different temperature applications.


The authors thank UKM and the Ministry of Science and Technology for research Grant UKM-GUP-NBT-08-27-113 and UKM-OUP-NBT-29-150/2011.


  1. K. Hill, “Fats and oils as oleochemical raw materials,” Journal of Oleo Science, vol. 50, pp. 433–444, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. Baumann, M. Büehler, H. Fochem, F. Hirsinger, H. Zoebelein, and J. Falbe, “Natural fats and oils—renewable raw materials for the chemical industry,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41–62, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  3. H. Schuster, L. A. Rios, P. P. Weckes, and W. F. Hoelderich, “Heterogeneous catalysts for the production of new lubricants with unique properties,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 348, no. 2, pp. 266–270, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. Lozada, G. J. Suppes, Y.-C. Tu, and F.-H. Hsieh, “Soy-based polyols from oxirane ring opening by alcoholysis reaction,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 2552–2560, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. Von, Heterogeneously catalyzed reactions with vegetable oils: epoxidation and nucleophilic epoxide ring-opening with alcohols, M.Sc-Chemisch Ingenieur, Universidad de Antioquia, Aus Medellín, Colombia, 2002.
  6. J. Salimon, N. Salih, and E. Yousif, “Chemically modified biolubricant basestocks from epoxidized oleic acid: Improved low temperature properties and oxidative stability,” Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, vol. 15, pp. 195–201, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Wu, H. Ding, S. Wang, and S. H. Xu, “Optimization conditions for the purification of linoleic acid from sunflower oil by urea complex fractionation,” Journal of the American Oil Chemist’ Society, vol. 85, pp. 677–684, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. K. Sharma, A. Adhvaryu, Z. Liu, and S. Z. Erhan, “Chemical modification of vegetable oils for lubricants applications,” Journal of the American Oil Chemist’ Society, vol. 83, pp. 129–136, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  9. H. S. Hwang and S. Z. Erhan, “Modification of epoxidized soybean oil for lubricant formulations with improved oxidative stability and low pour point,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 1179–1184, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. M. Doll, B. K. Sharma, and S. Z. Erhan, “Synthesis of branched methyl hydroxy stearates including an ester from bio-based levulinic acid,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 3513–3519, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. K. Sharma, K. M. Doll, and S. Z. Erhan, “Ester hydroxy derivatives of methyl oleate: tribological, oxidation and low temperature properties,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 15, pp. 7333–7340, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Kubouchi, H. Kai, K. Miyashita, and K. Matsuda, “Effects of emulsifiers on the oxidative stability of soybean oil TAG in emulsions,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 567–570, 2002. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Jumat Salimon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1260 Views | 595 Downloads | 10 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up

You are browsing a BETA version of Click here to switch back to the original design.