Application of Response Surface Methodology and Central Composite Inscribed Design for Modeling and Optimization of Marble Surface Quality

Table 6

Results of desirability function analysis.

Specimen	(m/min)	(bar)	(rpm)	Roughness (µm)	Glossiness (%)	Desirability
Adara	1.43	1.99	430.24	0.024353	98.5184	1
	1.42	1.91	456.94	0.026821	97.2577	1
	1.27	1.87	445.78	0.025516	97.6224	1
	1.14	1.91	472.54	0.026655	97.2	1
	1.51	1.99	452.32	0.02663	97.6163	1
	1.21	1.97	466.55	0.024925	98.0937	1
	1.01	1.96	468.01	0.026377	97.2929	1
	1.04	1.99	459.93	0.024636	98.1048	1
	1.02	1.96	422.37	0.023883	98.4338	1
	1.47	1.92	442.5	0.026544	97.4198	1
Emperador	1.47	1.92	442.5	0.026544	97.4198	1
	1.05	1.97	495.61	0.057958	88.4581	1
	0.87	1.89	490.91	0.054928	89.9367	1
	1.06	1.91	490.97	0.058389	88.1515	1
	0.88	1.78	466.37	0.055282	89.5013	1
	0.96	1.96	413.53	0.057281	89.0539	1
	0.93	1.92	488.02	0.05533	89.6604	1
	1.06	1.72	464.13	0.059584	87.2984	1
	0.99	1.79	480.66	0.058081	88.1641	1
	1.23	1.96	460.77	0.059729	87.3387	1
Crema Nera	1.23	1.96	460.77	0.059729	87.3387	1
	1.38	1.98	415.76	0.023521	98.9708	1
	1.58	1.96	411.99	0.0232711	99.8326	1
	1.35	1.93	421.76	0.0239895	98.7389	1
	0.80	0.64	527.22	0.0244613	99.4344	0.992986
	0.80	0.65	527.65	0.0244622	99.4177	0.992972
	0.80	0.69	522.79	0.0244713	99.3755	0.992833
	0.80	0.65	526.67	0.0244786	99.4078	0.992722
	0.80	0.77	514.46	0.0245365	99.2266	0.991838
	0.80	0.78	504.88	0.024713	99.2337	0.989137
Sand Wave	1.32	1.87	412.14	0.03903	95.0687	1
	0.82	1.03	421.2	0.039582	96.1216	1
	0.81	1.28	442.96	0.039169	95.3551	1
	0.81	1.33	451.25	0.040047	94.903	1
	0.88	1.9	445.67	0.028955	94.997	1
	1.31	1.95	413.04	0.036807	95.1173	1
	0.8	0.5	589.77	0.052103	94.5075	0.793667
	0.8	0.5	588.93	0.052274	94.4029	0.790065
	0.8	1.42	590	0.054404	93.43	0.74378