Research Article

Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Measures and Slope Position on Selected Soil Attributes at a Watershed Scale

Table 3

Effects of SWC measures and slope gradient on selected soil physicochemical properties in the study watershed.

Slope classesConservation measuresParameters
Clay (%)Silt (%)Sand (%)BD(g·cm−3)MC (%)PD(g·cm−3)TP (%)pH (H2O)OC (%)CEC(cmol (+) kg−1)TN (%)Ava.P (ppm)Ava.K(cmol (+) kg−1)

Upper (30–60%)C34.00c30.00de36.00a1.635.621.745.906.03e1.02e29.650.121.50e0.33
SFSB43.33b31.33cde25.33de1.399.291.9829.486.12de1.90c36.200.142.48de0.38
SFSBG37.33bc36.67abc26.00cde1.2814.232.1038.846.17d1.91c37.730.143.21cde0.53
SB35.33c33.33bcde31.33ab1.3112.931.9432.516.08de2.48ab37.090.144.01 cd0.58

Middle (15–30%)C37.33bc32.00bcde30.67abc1.4811.631.9222.916.15d1.35de36.900.123.84 cd0.43
SFSB34.00c38.00ab28.00bcd1.2116.302.3047.616.43b1.53 cd44.170.154.41 cd0.44
SFSBG37.33bc36.00abcd26.67bcde1.0719.712.4455.226.48b2.53ab46.540.174.75c0.59
SB35.33c41.33a23.33def1.1219.282.3552.026.33c2.02bc44.780.177.90b0.61

Lower (10–15%)C42.00b35.33abcd22.67ef1.3315.782.0233.856.43b1.71 cd44.480.133.76 cd0.49
SFSB34.67c34.67bcd30.67abc1.1317.862.6356.906.70a2.75a50.650.197.38b0.44
SFSBG34.67c38.00ab27.33bcde1.0524.722.7561.726.75a2.89a50.720.199.30b0.69
SB53.33a28.00e18.67f1.0620.882.7654.946.70a2.75a49.740.1911.59a0.48

LSD (0.05)6.916.294.984.98NsNsNsNs0.090.51NsNs2.07Ns

CV (%)9.9510.7510.8210.8212.9717.1016.7111.468.6014.6112.6419.5922.9219.59

BD = Bulk density, MC = moisture content, PD = particle density, TP = total porosity, CEC = cation exchange capacity, TN = total nitrogen, Ava.P = available phosphorus, Ava.K = available potassium, OC = organic carbon, C = nonconserved, SFSB = stone-faced soil bund, SFSBG = stone-faced soil bund stabilized with kidan grass, SB = soil bund, LSD = least significant difference, and CV = coefficient of variation.