Research Article
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Biophysical Soil and Water Conservation Structures: A Case Study of Offa Woreda, Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia
Table 10
Farmers’ acceptance and adoption of SWC structures.
| Indicators of acceptance and adoption | Percentage (%) | Yes (%) | No (%) |
| Indicators of acceptance | (a) Can the recently introduced SWC design effectively prevent 52.5 G and 5% soil erosion? | 52.5 | 47.5 | (b) Do you think the new SWC structure has the potential to increase land productivity? | 57.5 | 42.5 |
| Indicators of adoption | (a) Do you plan to keep the structure that has been built? | 68.7 | 31.3 | (b) Do you plan to introduce a new structure in an area that you have not dealt with currently? | 42.5 | 57.5 | (c) Do you think maintaining SWC is the responsibility of farmers? | 86.3 | 13.7 | (d) Should farmers pay to build and maintain SWCs on their farms? | 27.5 | 72.5 |
|
|