Research Article

Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil Quality Indicators: The Case of Geshy Subcatchment, Gojeb River Catchment, Ethiopia

Table 7

Pearson’s correlation coefficient between soil quality indicators of SWC measures in Geshy subcatchment.

Soil quality indicatorsSand (%)Silt (%)Clay (%)SWC, %TP, %pH-H2OSOC (%)TN (%)C : N ratio

Sandr0.021
P0.88
Siltr−0.180.371
P0.200.006
Clayr0.150.64−0.941
P0.270.0000.000
SWCr−0.08−0.15−0.1250.141
P0.580.2890.3680.31
TPr1.00−0.010.186−0.160.071
P0.0000.920.1790.240.60
pHr−0.01−0.510.0670.120.030.001
P0.950.0000.6320.440.820.98
SOCr−0.040.124−0.400.270.260.040.0331
P0.780.3720.0030.050.060.790.812
TNr−0.150.084−0.2490.160.200.150.1600.741
P0.270.5460.0700.250.150.270.2490.000
C : N ratior0.140.046−0.2360.170.05−0.14−0.1920.37−0.341
P0.330.7410.0860.210.710.330.1650.0060.012
APr−0.13−0.071−0.0440.08−0.170.13−0.115−0.2490.012−0.35
P0.370.6100.7500.580.2240.370.4060.0700.9300.009

, soil bulk density; VSWC, volumetric soil water content; TP, total porosity; SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; C : N ratio, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio; Av. P, available phosphorus. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Values are Pearson correlation coefficient (r) n = 54.