Research Article

Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil Quality Indicators: The Case of Geshy Subcatchment, Gojeb River Catchment, Ethiopia

Table 6

Results of the analysis of variance of soil quality indicators across the treatments, slope positions, and positions within the terraces in the Geshy subcatchment.

SQITreatmentSlope classesTerrace positionInteraction
T  ST  TePoS  TePoT  S  TePo
MSMSMSMSMSMSMS

0.000.810.060.420.030.210.030.210.020.370.010.600.000.97
Sand2.670.473.170.546.170.316.170.311.390.761.670.862.060.80
Silt2620.003.130.830.130.990.130.9943.60.0916.10.442.100.97
Clay2370.0110.70.714.570.864.570.8653.50.1920.30.624.910.96
SWC9260.0042.10.278670.001.540.9526.90.4375.50.0735.70.35
TP1.500.8121.10.4439.40.2239.40.2225.30.3716.50.623.320.97
pH0.330.000.030.250.010.570.110.890.030.270.010.720.010.58
SOC0.430.040.260.081.120.000.470.010.160.200.020.930.010.99
TN0.000.330.000.010.000.070.000.030.000.700.000.240.000.05
C : N2.770.031.050.144.840.000.250.621.280.103.860.004.260.00
AP7.950.088.940.037.760.053.080.291.810.480.310.974.660.13

SQI, soil quality indicators; , bulk density (gcm−3); SWC, volumetric soil water content (%); TP, total porosity (%); SOC, soil organic carbon (%); TN, total nitrogen (%); C : N, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio; AP, available phosphorus (ppm); MS, mean square error; P, value, T, treatments (i.e., with or without soil and water conservation measures); S, slope position; TePo, terrace positions. significantly different at .