Research Article

Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Project Risks in China: 2003–2019

Table 1

Risk index system of PPP project (positive and negative perspective).

The standard layerFirst-level elementsSecondary elementsIndicator formIndex unitIndicator attributeReference documentation

Driving forceEconomic riskLocal economic situationGDPBillions of dollarsForward direction[40]
Local fiscal situationFiscal and public budget revenueBillions of dollarsForward direction[41]
Driving forceFinancial riskGovernment debtBank loan balanceBillions of dollarsBackward direction[42]
Financing situationTotal investment of PPP projectBillions of dollarsOpposite direction[43]
PressureEcological riskEcological environment governanceTotal investment of pollution controlBillions of dollarsBackward direction[44]
PressureTechnical riskTechnological levelR&D funds10,000 dollarsForward direction[45]
PressureManagement riskManagement capabilityLevel of higher education receivedNumber of peopleForward direction[4648]
Efficiency of the administrative systemGovernment efficiency%Forward direction[49]
StateSocial riskPublic health emergency of international concernValue added of administrative review and administrative appeal casesNumber of packagesBackward direction[50]
StateNatural disaster riskLosses caused by events of force majeureDirect economic losses caused by natural disasters in that yearBillions of dollarsBackward direction[51]
ImpactPolitical riskCorruptionDuty crime + corruptionNumber of peopleBackward direction[52]
ImpactCredit riskGovernment creditStaffing changes for public officialsThousands of peopleBackward direction[53]
Social capital creditNumber of enterprises discreditedNumber of packagesBackward direction[54]
ResponseMarket riskPPP market competitionNumber of PPP projectsIndividualBackward direction[55]
Raw material price volatilityBuilding materials price index%Backward direction[50]