Efficacious Discriminant Analysis (Classifier) Measures for End Users

Table 6

(a) and (b) compare the summary likelihood ratios originally reported [13] (a) and the corresponding , , and (b). Both measure suites show that the anti-CCP test is better, as does the summary statistic .

(a)

Normalized odds ratio measures
Test
Anti-CCP	12.46 (9.72–15.98)	0.36 (0.31–0.42)
RF	4.86 (3.95–5.97)	0.38 (0.33–0.44)

(b)

Expected (annual economic) impact ($10^3)
Test
Anti-CCP	−0.55 (−0.56–−0.44)	−9.6 (−9.7–−9.5)	−5.1 (−5.1–−5.0)
RF	−1.4 (−1.6–−1.3)	−9.5 (−9.6–−9.4)	−5.5 (−5.5–−5.5)